DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Community Characteristics of Benthic Macroinvertebrates according to Growth Environment at Rural Palustrine Wetland

농촌지역 소택형습지의 생육환경에 따른 저서성대형무척추동물 군집 특성

  • Son, Jin-Kwan (Relationship of Dankook University & Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Choon (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Dankook Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Heui (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kang, Banghun (National Academy of Agricultural Science, RDA)
  • 손진관 (단국대학교-농촌진흥청 학연협동과정) ;
  • 김남춘 (단국대학교 녹지조경학과) ;
  • 김미희 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 강방훈 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원)
  • Received : 2012.08.13
  • Accepted : 2012.10.24
  • Published : 2012.10.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to understand the community characteristics of benthic macroinvertebrates according to Growth Environment at 6 Palustrine Wetlands in a rural area. As growth environment factors, size, water depth, water inlet and water outlet, land-use and water environment was analyzed. Two years' quantitative collection of benthic macroinvertebrate was carried out, and it executed community analysis and ESB index calculation and also carried out twinspan, MDS and correlation analysis. As a result, the collected benthic macroinvertebrate was 1254 individuals with 3 Phylums, 6 Classes, 14 Orders, 35 Families, 52 Genera and 61 Species. Odonata and Coenagreionidae had the highest species and individuals. Dominance Index was 0.252~0.698, Diversity Index was 1.661~2.902, Evenness Index was 0.414~0.724, and Species Richness Index was 1.990~6.224. As a result of community analysis, when correlation analysis was executed, Dominance Index had the opposite tendency with Diversity Index and Evenness Index, which had the same tendency with the previous studies. When ESB Index was calculated, Grade 2 (polluted) had the highest species with 48 species (78.7%). It is determined from the Environmental quality evaluation and saprobity evaluation result according to ESB index that there is a need to revise environmental evaluation system more specifically. As a result of MDS analysis, the subject spots A and D had the highest similarity, and the subject spot E and D had a relatively high similarity. The life environment that is the closest related with species diversity is estimated by the land-use. As for number of Individual, it seems to have the closest relation with inlet, which is to be determined as a characteristics of Palustrine Wetland. Through such investigation, this study is expected to be utilized for various types of habitats including ecological pond and to be utilized for the increase of species diversity in rural areas.

Keywords

References

  1. 강방훈․손진관. 2011. 농촌지역 소하천의 환경성 평가 연구 : 홍성군 홍동천을 사례로. 한국환경복원기술학회지 14(5) : 81-101.
  2. 김귀곤. 2003. 자연과 인간이 만드는 습지 : 습지와 환경. 아카데미서적.
  3. 김명현․한민수․최철만․방혜선․정명표․나영은․강기경. 2010. 꼬마잠자리 서식지의 실물상과 생활형. 한국환경농학회지 29(2) : 206-213.
  4. 농업과학기술원. 2006. 논 생태계 수서무척추 동물도감.
  5. 박정호․임환철․라혜강. 2007. 팔당호 저서성 대형무척추동물 군집의 생태학적 연구. 환경연구논문집 4 : 52-72.
  6. 손진관․강방훈․김남춘. 2010. 농지연못습지의 수질 및 토양환경 분석. 한국환경복원기술학회지 3(3) : 46-62.
  7. 윤일병․공동수․유재근. 1992. 저서성 대형무척추동물에 의한 생물학적 수질평가 연구(1) : 오탁계급치 및 지표가중치 산정을 중심으로. 환경생물 10(1) : 24-39.
  8. 이동준․윤춘식․이준철․성성훈․박다라․정선우. 2009. 우포늪 저서성 대형무척추동물군집의 장기생태모니터링을 위한 기반조사. 한국환경과학회지 18(12) : 1399-1410.
  9. 이동한․황종우․성성훈․윤춘식․정선우. 2009. 신불산 고산습지의 저서성 대형무척추동물군집구조의 특성. 한국환경과학회지 18(5) : 561-567.
  10. 이영상. 2007. 새뱅이(토하)를 이용한 환경친화적 벼 복합영농기술 개발.
  11. 이은희․장하경․박민영․윤지현․김재근․배연재. 2008. 꼬마잠자리 서식처 복원을 위한 기초 연구. 한국환경생태학회지 22(1) : 35-42.
  12. 이종욱․최진경․오승호․최강원. 2010. 운문산 자연휴식년제 지역 내 저서성 대형무척추동물상 및 생물학적 수질평가. 한국환경생태학회지 24(1) : 001-013.
  13. 이황구․정상우․최준길. 2012. 횡성호 일대 저서성 대형무척추동물 군집구조의 생태적 특성 분석. 한국환경생태학회지 26(1) : 45-56.
  14. 조동길. 2004. 소택형습지의 복원 및 창출을 위한 생태적 식재 설계 모델 : 생물다양성을 중심으로. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  15. 최아름․박선진․김진영․송미영․공동수. 2012. 진위천의 수질과 저서성 대형무척추동물 군집지수의 상관관계. 한국하천호수학회 45(1) : 1-10.
  16. 한국동물분류학회. 1997. 한국동물명집.
  17. 환경부. 2001. 내륙습지의 유형별 평가기법 및 관리방안에 관한 연구.
  18. 환경부. 2012. 환경적책기본법 시행령 별표 1.
  19. 환경부. UNDP, GEF, UNDP/GEF 국가습지보전 사업관리단. 2006. 제2차 전국내륙습지 조사지침.
  20. Allan, D. J., 1995, Stream Ecology : Structure and function of running waters, Champman & Hall, London.
  21. James, H., Thorp, P., Alan, P. C., 2001, Ecology and Classification of North American Freshwater Invertebrates, 2nd ed., Academic Press.
  22. Margalef, R., 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst., 3 : 36-71.
  23. Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg, eds. 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. 4th Ed., Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa.
  24. McNaughton, S.J., 1967. Relationship among functional properties of California Glassland. Nature. 216 : 168-144.
  25. Mitsch, W. j., and Gosselink, J. G. 1993. Wetland (Second Edition), John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  26. Pielou, 1969. Shannon's formula as a measure of specific diversity : its use and misuse. Amer. Nat., 100 : 463-465.
  27. Pielou, E.C. 1975. Ecological diversity. New York, John Wiley.
  28. Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2006. Ramsar Convention Manual, 4th edition.
  29. Tilton, D. L., Karen Shaw, Brian Ballard and William Thomas. 2001. A Wetland Protection Plan for the Lower One Subwatershed of the Rouge River. Aquatic Botany, 28 : 227-242.
  30. Waters, T.F. 1995. Sediment in streams : sources, biological effects and control, American Fisheries Society.
  31. Ward, J. V., 1992, Aquatic Insect Ecology, John Wiley & Sons, 438.

Cited by

  1. The assessment of conservation value for agricultural pond wetland using the weighted function of modified RAM vol.20, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.4.013
  2. The Development of a Sampling Instrument for Aquatic Organisms in Rice Paddy Fields: Submerged Funnel Traps with Attractants vol.35, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2017.35.4.640
  3. Regional and Temporal Characteristics of Aquatic Organism Communities in Rice Paddy Fields, using Submerged Funnel Trap vol.36, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2018.36.2.099
  4. 서부 민간인출입통제구역 일대 둠벙의 저서성대형무척추동물 종 다양성 및 군집 특성 vol.53, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.11614/ksl.2020.53.2.173