DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

사용자 만족도 조사를 통한 국토환경성평가지도 발전방안 연구

Development Strategy for Utilization of ECVAM using the User Survey

  • 송원경 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) ;
  • 김은영 (한국환경정책.평가연구원) ;
  • 전성우 (한국환경정책.평가연구원)
  • 투고 : 2012.05.24
  • 심사 : 2012.08.21
  • 발행 : 2012.08.31

초록

The purpose of this study is to work out strategy for utilization of Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map (ECVAM) using the user survey. It surveyed system users of ECVAM about its recognition and satisfaction. The results of the survey, the ECVAM became more popular and were highly satisfied with updated data. Especially, the study found a relationship between the satisfaction of ECVAM and accuracy, utilization, and convenience of the system. However, the satisfaction has a difference between user groups, a government official and a agent for EIA including researchers. The satisfaction of the agent group was affected by the convenience, the accuracy, and the utilization in order. In the other hand, the satisfaction of the government official group was affected by the utilization, the convenience, the accuracy, and recognition in order. Therefore, we need to adopt different strategies for educations of ECVAM and publicity activities depending on user groups. To increase the satisfaction of ECVAM, we should research not only to attain pinpoint accuracy, but also to suggest the guideline to utilize the map for a government official.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박성복. 2011. 노인의 주거관련 요인과 삶의 만족도. 한국행정논집 23(3):731-758.
  2. 이종진, 이현택, 조현주. 2012. 자연휴양림의 서비스 품질이 이용자 만족도 및 재방문의도에 미치는 영향 분석 -경북지역 5개 자연휴양림을 중심으로-. 한국조경학회지 40(2):64-73.
  3. 환경부. 2003. 국토환경보전계획 수립 연구.
  4. 환경부. 2008. 국토환경평가지도 백서(2001년-2008년).
  5. 환경부. 2010. 2010년 국토환경평가지도 유지관리.
  6. 환경부. 2011. 2011년 국토환경성평가지도 유지․관리사업.
  7. Gontier, M., U. Mortberg, and B. Balfors. 2010. Comparing GIS-based habitat models for applications in EIA and SEA. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30(1):8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.003
  8. Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory(2nd ed.). New York, McGraw-Hill.
  9. Richard, M.A. 2000. A discrepancy model for measuring customer satisfaction with rehabilitation services. Journal of Rehabilitation 34(3):37-42.
  10. The R Development Core Team. 2012. R:A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Reference Index.
  11. Westbrook, R.A. and M.D. Reilly. 1983. Value percept disparity:An alternative to the disconfirmation of expectations theory of consumer satisfaction, advances in consumer research. Association for Consumer Research 22:256-261.