DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

어류군집 특성과 하안형태복잡도와의 관계

Relationship between fish assemblages community and Streamline complexity

  • Kim, Jin-Ah (Dept. of Environmental Science, Graduate School, Konkuk University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Woo (Dept. of Environmental Science, Konkuk University) ;
  • Hwang, Gil-Son (Halla Engineering & Construction) ;
  • Kim, Chulgoo (Center for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.01.02
  • 심사 : 2012.03.12
  • 발행 : 2012.04.30

초록

Numerous studies suggested that fish assemblage structure reflects the status of stream ecosystems. The status of streams integrity, including various trophic levels, water quality and habitat degradation, can be assessed by fish assemblages. In this study, we investigated the relationships between fish assemblages and streamline geometry of streams. Previous studies suggested that geomorphologic parameter can be a critical factor of permeability between adjacent two systems. From a landscape ecological perspective, edges may partially control the flow rate of energy between two adjacent systems. Thus, the Streamline geometry can be a geomorphologic parameter that exhibits the integrity of stream. We selected the Nakdong river for study areas, which is one of major rivers and the longest (525 km) River in South Korea. We used the revised IBI representing overall ecological characteristics of Korean fish assemblages and eight sub-assessment criteria of IBI, collected from 82 sampling sites in the Nakdong River. For calculating the Streamline geometry, we measured fractal dimension index that generally used in biology, ecology and landscape ecology. We used the digital land-use/land-cover map and generated a 1-km buffer for each sampling site and refined the shape of the Streamlines. Pearson correlation analyses were performed between Streamline geometry and IBI and sub-assessment criteria of IBI. The results show that IBI and eight sub-assessments of fish are significantly correlated with geometry of Streamline. The fractal dimension of Streamline geometry were related with IBI (r = 0.48) and six sub-assessments of IBI, including total number of native fish and native species, the number of riffle benthic species, sensitive species, tolerant species and native insectivore. Especially, the number of tolerant species(r = -0.52) and native insectivore(r = 0.52) show strong correlation with geometry of Streamline. These results indicate that lower Streamline geometry can result in poor fish assemblages, while higher geometry of Streamline can enhance fish assemblages by potentially supplying insects and better habitat conditions. We expect the results of our study to be useful for stream restoration and management. However, we see the necessity of study investigating the mechanisms how Streamline geometry affect fish assemblages.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국립환경과학원.한강물환경연구소. 2009. 수변환경의 경관 및 사회, 경제가치 평가 : 2008년(1년차) 보고서
  2. 농림부. 2000. 농업용수 수질개선 시험사업 보고서(IV). 농업기반공사.
  3. 이도원.장현정.강신규. 2000. 생태학적.육수학적 현상들에 대한 프랙탈의 적용. 한국육수학회지 33(2) : 69-79.
  4. 최지용.정유진. 2000. 수질개선을 위한 수변녹지의 조성 및 관리방안 연구. 한국환경정책.평가연구원 연구보고서.
  5. 환경부. 2006. 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구 보고서.
  6. 환경부. 2007. 수생태 건강성 회복을 위한 하천복원 모델과 기준. 조사계획 수립 연구 최종보고서 3 : 수생태 건강성 조사계획 수립 및 지침.
  7. 환경부.국립환경과학원. 2009. 수생태계 건강성 조사 및 평가 최종보고서. 1-19.
  8. Barling, R. D., and Moore, I. D. 1994. Role of buffer strips in management of waterway pollution : A review, Environ Manage 18(4) : 543-558. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02400858
  9. Cadenasso, M. L., and S. T. A. Pickett. 2000. Linking forest edge structure to edge function : mediation of herbivore damage. Journal of Ecology 88 : 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00423.x
  10. Forman, R. T. T. 1995. Land Mosaics : the Ecology of Landscape and Regions, New York : Cambridge University Press.
  11. Garcia, F., Carrere, P., Soussana, J. F., and Baumont, R. 2005. Characterisation by fractal analysis of foraging paths of ewes grazing heterogeneous swards, Appl Anim Behav Sci. 93(1-2) : 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.01.001
  12. Karr. JR. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries Science 6 : 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  13. Lee, S. W., Hwang, S. J., Lee, J. K., Jung, D. I., Park, Y. J., and Kim, J. T., 2011. Overview and application of the National Aquatic Ecological Monitoring Program(NAEMP) in Korea, International Journal of Limnology 47 : S3-S14. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2011016
  14. McGarigal, K., and Marks, B. J. 1995. FRAGSTATS : spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report - US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service(PNW-GTR-351).
  15. Park, S.S., and Lee, Y.S. 2002. A water quality modeling study of the Nakdong River, Korea. Ecological Modelling 152(1) : 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00489-6
  16. Park, S.Y., Choi, J.H., Wang, S.K., and Park, S.S., 2006. Design of a water quality monitoring network in a large river system using the genetic algorithm. Ecological Modelling 199(3) : 289-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.06.002
  17. USEPA, 2002. Biological assessments and criteria : crucial components of water quality programs. EPA 822-F-02-006., Washington D.C. USA.
  18. Weaver, M. J., Magnuson, J. J., and Clayton, M. K., 1997. Distribution of littoral fishes in structurally complex macrophytes, Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 54(10) : 2277-2289.
  19. Wiens, J. A. 1992. Ecological flows across landscape boundaries : a conceptual overview. In A. J. Hansen and F. di Castri, eds. Landscape Boundaries : Consequences for Biotic Diversity and Ecological Flows, New York : Springer-Verlag. 217-235.
  20. Yoder CO., and MA Smith. 1999. Using fish assemblages in a state biological assessment and criteria program : Essential concepts and considerations. In Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities(TP Simon ed). CRC Press LLC. 17-56.