Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Usefulness of Intravenous Anesthesia Using a Target-controlled Infusion System with Local Anesthesia in Submuscular Breast Augmentation Surgery

  • Chung, Kyu-Jin (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cha, Kyu-Ho (Logos Aesthetic Surgery Clinic) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Ho (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yong-Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Tae-Gon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Il-Guk (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2012.05.31
  • Accepted : 2012.08.14
  • Published : 2012.09.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background Patients have anxiety and fear of complications due to general anesthesia. Through new instruments and local anesthetic drugs, a variety of anesthetic methods have been introduced. These methods keep hospital costs down and save time for patients. In particular, the target-controlled infusion (TCI) system maintains a relatively accurate level of plasma concentration, so the depth of anesthesia can be adjusted more easily. We conducted this study to examine whether intravenous anesthesia using the TCI system with propofol and remifentanil would be an effective method of anesthesia in breast augmentation. Methods This study recruited 100 patients who underwent breast augmentation surgery from February to August 2011. Intravenous anesthesia was performed with 10 mg/mL propofol and 50 ${\mu}g/mL$ remifentanil simultaneously administered using two separate modules of a continuous computer-assisted TCI system. The average target concentration was set at 2 ${\mu}g/mL$ and 2 ng/mL for propofol and remifentanil, respectively, and titrated against clinical effect and vital signs. Oxygen saturation, electrocardiography, and respiratory status were continuously measured during surgery. Blood pressure was measured at 5-minute intervals. Information collected includes total duration of surgery, dose of drugs administered during surgery, memory about surgery, and side effects. Results Intraoperatively, there was transient hypotension in two cases and hypoxia in three cases. However, there were no serious complications due to anesthesia such as respiratory difficulty, deep vein thrombosis, or malignant hypertension, for which an endotracheal intubation or reversal agent would have been needed. All the patients were discharged on the day of surgery and able to ambulate normally. Conclusions Our results indicate that anesthetic methods, where the TCI of propofol and remifentanil is used, might replace general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation in breast augmentation surgery.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Yeungnam University

References

  1. Bitar G, Mullis W, Jacobs W, et al. Safety and efficacy of office-based surgery with monitored anesthesia care/sedation in 4778 consecutive plastic surgery procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:150-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200301000-00025
  2. Yeganeh N, Roshani B, Yari M, et al. Target-controlled infusion anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil compared with manually controlled infusion anesthesia in mastoidectomy surgeries. Middle East J Anesthesiol 2010;20:785-93.
  3. Spear SL, Bulan EJ. The medial periareolar approach to submuscular augmentation mammaplasty under local anesthesia: a 10-Year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:771-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200109010-00029
  4. Tahiri Y, Tran de QH, Bouteaud J, et al. General anaesthesia versus thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery: a metaanalysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011;64:1261-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2011.03.025
  5. Eldor L, Weissman A, Fodor L, et al. Breast augmentation under general anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care: a retrospective comparative study. Ann Plast Surg 2008;61: 243-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e31815bfe98
  6. Song IS, Yoo YC, Yang WY, et al. Effective intravenous conscious sedation using MAC (Monitored Anesthesia Care) and BIS (Bispectral Index) in plastic surgery field. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg 2005;11:40-4.
  7. Horton JB, Reece EM, Broughton G 2nd, et al. Patient safety in the office-based setting. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:61e-80e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000204796.65812.68
  8. Byrd HS, Barton FE, Orenstein HH, et al. Safety and efficacy in an accredited outpatient plastic surgery facility: areview of 5316 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112:636-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000070976.80666.50
  9. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL, et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1502-16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199906000-00003
  10. Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology 1997;86:10-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199701000-00004
  11. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1004-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200204000-00031
  12. Eikaas H, Raeder J. Total intravenous anaesthesia techniques for ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009;22: 725-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e3283310f6b
  13. Cillo JE Jr. Propofol anesthesia for outpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:530-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70129-0
  14. Jost U, Dorsing C, Jahr C, et al. Propofol and postoperative nausea and/or vomiting. Anaesthesist 1997;46:776-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001010050468
  15. Gupta A, Stierer T, Zuckerman R, et al. Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: a systematic review. Anesth Analg 2004;98:632-41.
  16. Burkle H, Dunbar S, Van Aken H. Remifentanil: a novel, short-acting, mu-opioid. Anesth Analg 1996;83:646-51. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199609000-00038
  17. Melloni C, Antolini F, Di Mauro L, et al. Propofol and remifentanil in day surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2000;66:671-84.
  18. Twersky RS, Jamerson B, Warner DS, et al. Hemodynamics and emergence profile of remifentanil versus fentanyl prospectively compared in a large population of surgical patients. J Clin Anesth 2001;13:407-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(01)00292-6
  19. Schwilden H, Schuttler J. The determination of an effective therapeutic infusion rate for intravenous anesthetics using feedback-controlled dosages. Anaesthesist 1990;39:603-6.
  20. De Castro V, Godet G, Mencia G, et al. Target-controlled infusion for remifentanil in vascular patients improves hemodynamics and decreases remifentanil requirement. Anesth Analg 2003;96:33-8.
  21. Suttner S, Boldt J, Schmidt C, et al. Cost analysis of targetcontrolled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens. Anesth Analg 1999;88:77-82.
  22. Fombeur PO, Tilleul PR, Beaussier MJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2002;59:1344-50.