Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Augmentation Mammaplasty Using Implants: A Review

  • Received : 2012.03.15
  • Accepted : 2012.04.02
  • Published : 2012.09.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

One of the techniques for augmentation mammaplasty is the procedure using implants. Even though this technique has been used for many years, there are still several controversial issues to be discussed and overcome for patient safety. In this review article, capsular contracture, leak or rupture of the implants, possible systemic disease, relation with breast cancer, and recent problems with Poly Implant Prothese implants are described and discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Dunn KW, Hall PN, Khoo CT. Breast implant materials: sense and safety. Br J Plast Surg 1992;45:315-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90060-B
  2. Hoopes JE, Edgerton MT Jr, Shelley W. Organic synthetics for augmentation mammaplasty: their relation to breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967;39:263-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196703000-00005
  3. Lilla JA, Vistnes LM. Long-term study of reactions to various silicone breast implants in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 57:637-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197605000-00012
  4. May DS, Stroup NE. The incidence of sarcomas of the breast among women in the United States, 1973-1986. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:193-4.
  5. De Cholnoky T. Augmentation mammaplasty. Survey of complications in 10,941 patients by 265 surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1970;45:573-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197006000-00007
  6. Harris HI. Survey of breast implants from the point of view of carcinogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull 1961; 28:81-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196107000-00007
  7. Deapen DM, Pike MC, Casagrande JT, et al. The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77: 361-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198603000-00001
  8. Deapen DM, Brody GS. Augmentation mammaplasty and breast cancer: a 5-year update of the Los Angeles study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:660-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199204000-00010
  9. Duvic M, Moore D, Menter A, et al. Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in association with silicone breast implants. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995;32:939-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0190-9622(95)91328-9
  10. Keech JA Jr, Creech BJ. Anaplastic T-cell lymphoma in proximity to a saline-filled breast implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:554-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199708000-00064
  11. Gaudet G, Friedberg JW, Weng A, et al. Breast lymphoma associated with breast implants: two case-reports and a review of the literature. Leuk Lymphoma 2002;43:115-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428190210189
  12. de Jong D, Vasmel WL, de Boer JP, et al. Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma in women with breast implants. JAMA 2008;300: 2030-5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2008.585
  13. Baldwin CM Jr, Kaplan EN. Silicone-induced human adjuvant disease? Ann Plast Surg 1983;10:270-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198304000-00002
  14. Andersen B, Hawtof D, Alani H, et al. The diagnosis of ruptured breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:903-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198912000-00006
  15. Shons AR, Schubert W. Silicone breast implants and immune disease. Ann Plast Surg 1992;28:491-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199205000-00017
  16. Brody GS, Conway DP, Deapen DM, et al. Consensus statement on the relationship of breast implants to connectivetissue disorders. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;90:1102-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199212000-00029
  17. Backovic A, Huang HL, Del Frari B, et al. Identification anddynamics of proteins adhering to the surface of medical silicones in vivo and in vitro. J Proteome Res 2007;6:376-81. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr0603755
  18. Backovic A, Wolfram D, Del-Frari B, et al. Simultaneous analysis of multiple serum proteins adhering to the surface of medical grade polydimethylsiloxane elastomers. J Immunol Methods 2007;328:118-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2007.08.016
  19. Bassetto F, Vindigni V, Scarpa C, et al. Breast prostheses and connective tissue disease (CTD): myth or reality? Aesthetic Plast Surg 2010;34:257-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-009-9422-0
  20. Asplund O. Capsular contracture in silicone gel and salinefilled breast implants after reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;73:270-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198402000-00022
  21. Capozzi A. Clinical experience with Heyer-Schulte inflatable implants in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:772-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198605000-00014
  22. Chang L, Caldwell E, Reading G, et al. A comparison of conventional and low-bleed implants in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:79-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199289010-00015
  23. Schuster DI, Lavine DM. Nine-year experience with subpectoral breast reconstruction after subcutaneous mastectomy in 98 patients utilizing saline-inflatable prostheses. Ann Plast Surg 1988;21:444-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198811000-00009
  24. Takayanagi S. A general overview with regard to the use of synthetic implants for breast reconstruction. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;37:729-36.
  25. Coleman DJ, Foo IT, Sharpe DT. Textured or smooth implants for breast augmentation? A prospective controlled trial. Br J Plast Surg 1991;44:444-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(91)90204-W
  26. Ersek RA. Rate and incidence of capsular contracture: a comparison of smooth and textured silicone double-lumen breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:879-84. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199105000-00012
  27. Hakelius L, Ohlsen L. A clinical comparison of the tendency to capsular contracture between smooth and textured gelfilled silicone mammary implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90:247-54. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199290020-00012
  28. Hall-Findlay EJ. Breast implant complication review: double capsules and late seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;127: 56-66.
  29. de Camara DL, Sheridan JM, Kammer BA. Rupture and aging of silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;91:828-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199304001-00012
  30. Erdmann MW, Asplund O, Bahnasy N. Transcutaneous extravasation of silicone following breast augmentation. Br J Plast Surg 1992;45:479-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90214-I
  31. Nelson GD. Complications of closed compression after augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66:71-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198007000-00014
  32. Sanger JR, Matloub HS, Yousif NJ, et al. Silicone gel infiltration of a peripheral nerve and constrictive neuropathy following rupture of a breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;89:949-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199205000-00029
  33. Rolland C, Guidoin R, Marceau D, et al. Nondestructive investigations on ninety-seven surgically excised mammary prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res 1989;23:285-98.
  34. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, et al. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151: 469-73. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.3.469
  35. Mitnick JS, Harris MN, Roses DF. Mammographic detection of carcinoma of the breast in patients with augmentation prostheses. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;168:30-2.
  36. Hayes H Jr, Vandergrift J, Diner WC. Mammography and breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;82:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198882010-00001

Cited by

  1. An Innovative Procedure for the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Capsular Contracture (CC) Following Breast Augmentation vol.33, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x13502035
  2. The Effect of Montelukast and Antiadhesion Barrier Solution on the Capsule Formation after Insertion of Silicone Implants in a White Rat Model vol.51, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1159/000356443
  3. In Vivo Effects of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Inducing Neuronal Regeneration in Sprague-Dawley Rats Undergoing Nerve Defect Bridged with Polycaprolactone Nanotubes vol.29, pp.suppl3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2014.29.s3.s183
  4. Silicone breast implants and echocardiographic interactions: A brand new study vol.49, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.197233
  5. Round versus Anatomical Implants in Primary Cosmetic Breast Augmentation : A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review vol.143, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005371
  6. Current status of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in South Korea vol.64, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.1.5