Archives of Plastic Surgery

Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한성형외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap

  • Lee, Min Jae (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yun, In Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Rah, Dong Kyun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Won Jai (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2012.04.12
  • Accepted : 2012.06.19
  • Published : 2012.07.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap has become a popular option for treating soft tissue defects of lower extremity reconstruction and can be combined with a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle. We present a comparison of the use of the ALT fasciocutaneous (ALT-FC) and myocutaneous flaps. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients in whom free-tissue transfer was performed between 2005 and 2011 for the reconstruction of lower extremity soft-tissue defects. Twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: reconstruction using an ALT-FC flap (12 cases) and reconstruction using a vastus lateralis myocutaneous (VL-MC) flap (12 cases). Postoperative complications, functional results, cosmetic results, and donor-site morbidities were studied. Results Complete flap survival was 100% in both groups. A flap complication was noted in one case (marginal dehiscence) of the ALT-FC group, and no complications were noted in the VL-MC group. In both groups, one case of partial skin graft loss occurred at the donor site, and debulking surgeries were needed for two cases. There were no significant differences in the mean scores for either functional or cosmetic outcomes in either group. Conclusions The VL-MC flap is able to fill occasional dead space and has comparable survival rates to ALT-FC with minimal donor-site morbidity. Additionally, the VL-MC flap is easily elevated without myocutaneous perforator injury.

Keywords

References

  1. Coessens BC, Van Geertruyden JP, Vico PG. Free TRAM flap for lower-extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 1994;10:305-11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1006599
  2. Kaplan I, Ada S, Ozerkan F, et al. Reconstruction of soft tissue and bone defects in lower extremity with free flaps. Microsurgery 1998;18:176-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2752(1998)18:3<176::AID-MICR10>3.0.CO;2-V
  3. Gonzalez MH, Tarandy DI, Troy D, et al. Free tissue coverage of chronic traumatic wounds of the lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:592-600. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200202000-00028
  4. Pu LL, Medalie DA, Lawrence SJ, et al. Reconstruction of through-and-through gunshot wounds to the feet with free gracilis muscle flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:286-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000046785.28027.64
  5. Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984;37:149-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(84)90002-X
  6. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, et al. Have we found an ideal softtissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2219-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200206000-00007
  7. Kimura N, Satoh K, Hasumi T, et al. Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:1197-208. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200110000-00015
  8. Rajacic N, Gang RK, Krishnan J, et al. Thin anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg 2002;48:252-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-200203000-00004
  9. Reddy V, Stevenson TR. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:1-7.
  10. Ozkan O, Coskunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE. The use of free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstructing soft tissue defects of the lower extremities. Ann Plast Surg 2004;53:455-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000137135.15728.94
  11. Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S, et al. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:1517-23. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199810000-00026
  12. Choi SW, Park JY, Hur MS, et al. An anatomic assessment on perforators of the lateral circumflex femoral artery for anterolateral thigh flap. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:866-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e3180a03304
  13. Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Kuo MH, et al. Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity reconstruction: clinical experience and functional assessment of donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1766-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200106000-00019
  14. Tayfur V, Magden O, Edizer M, et al. Anatomy of vastus lateralis muscle flap. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1951-3. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f4ee7f
  15. Nelson JA, Serletti JM, Wu LC. The vastus lateralis muscle flap in head and neck reconstruction: an alternative flap for soft tissue defects. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:28-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181a20cf1
  16. Yildirim S, Gideroglu K, Akoz T. Anterolateral thigh flap: ideal free flap choice for lower extremity soft-tissue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003;19:225-33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-40578

Cited by

  1. Versatility of the lateral circumflex femoral arterial (LCFA) system flaps for lower extremity soft tissue reconstruction vol.36, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0847-y
  2. Flap reconstruction of the knee: A review of current concepts and a proposed algorithm vol.5, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.603
  3. The localization of the distal perforators of posterior tibial artery: a cadaveric study for the correct planning of medial adipofascial flaps vol.37, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1275-9
  4. Perforator Flap versus Conventional Flap vol.30, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2015.30.5.514
  5. The vastus lateralis free flap for lower extremity gustilo grade III reconstruction vol.37, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22526
  6. Free versus perforator‐pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: What is the safest coverage? A meta‐analysis vol.38, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30047
  7. Tear drop‐free anterolateral thigh flap, a versatile design for lower limb reconstruction after trauma vol.38, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30235
  8. Limb Salvage Using Combined Linking Perforator Free Flaps vol.19, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734619864240
  9. The Vastus Lateralis Free Flap and Donor-Site Morbidity. A Systematic Review vol.6, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/24727512211033134
  10. Deep Inferior Epigastric Flap Combined Bilateral-Anterolateral Thigh Flap for the Coverage of Both Lower Extremity Soft-Tissue Defect: A Case Report and a Literature Review vol.14, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2147/ccid.s292053
  11. Sensory assessment of meshed skin grafts over free gracilis muscle flaps without nerve coaptation for lower extremity reconstruction vol.48, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00584
  12. Reconstruction of burn scar contracture deformity of the extremities using thin thoracodorsal artery perforator free flaps vol.91, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.16640
  13. Assessment of post‐surgical donor‐site morbidity in vastus lateralis free flap for head and neck reconstructive surgery: an observational study vol.91, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17187