Archives of Plastic Surgery

  • 제39권4호
  • /
  • Pages.309-316
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 2234-6163(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6171(eISSN)
대한성형외과학회 (Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of Virtual Surgical Planning with Computer Assisted Design and Manufacturing Technology to Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

  • Zhao, Linping (The Craniofacial Center, University of Illinois Medical Center) ;
  • Patel, Pravin K. (The Craniofacial Center, University of Illinois Medical Center) ;
  • Cohen, Mimis (The Craniofacial Center, University of Illinois Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2012.03.11
  • 심사 : 2012.03.28
  • 발행 : 2012.07.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Computer aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology today is the standard in manufacturing industry. The application of the CAD/CAM technology, together with the emerging 3D medical images based virtual surgical planning (VSP) technology, to craniomaxillofacial reconstruction has been gaining increasing attention to reconstructive surgeons. This article illustrates the components, system and clinical management of the VSP and CAD/CAM technology including: data acquisition, virtual surgical and treatment planning, individual implant design and fabrication, and outcome assessment. It focuses primarily on the technical aspects of the VSP and CAD/CAM system to improve the predictability of the planning and outcome.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1016-22. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1016
  2. Ambrose J. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography).2. Clinical application. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1023-47. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1023
  3. Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Harders A, et al. Prefabricated prostheses for the reconstruction of skull defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:104-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80870-7
  4. Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schwarz U, et al. Manufacturing splints for orthognathic surgery using a three-dimensional printer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(08)00167-4
  5. Vannier MW, Marsh JL, Warren JO. Three dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. Radiology 1984;150:179-84. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.150.1.6689758
  6. Toth BA, Ellis DS, Stewart WB. Computer-designed prostheses for orbitocranial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:315-24. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198803000-00001
  7. Robb RA. Biomedical imaging, visualization, and analysis. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2000.
  8. Woolson ST, Dev P, Fellingham LL, et al. Three-dimensional imaging of bone from computerized tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(202):239-48.
  9. Solar P, Ulm C, Lill W, et al. Precision of three-dimensional CT-assisted model production in the maxillofacial area. Eur Radiol 1992;2:473-7.
  10. Eufinger H, Wehmoller M, Machtens E, et al. Reconstruction of craniofacial bone defects with individual alloplastic implants based on CAD/CAM-manipulated CT-data. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1995;23:175-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80007-1
  11. Wehmoller M, Eufinger H, Kruse D, et al. CAD by processing of computed tomography data and CAM of individually designed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;24:90-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80868-9
  12. Klein HM, Schneider W, Alzen G, et al. Pediatric craniofacial surgery: comparison of milling and stereolithography for 3D model manufacturing. Pediatr Radiol 1992;22:458-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013512
  13. Housholder R. Molding process. US Patent 4,247,508. Filed December 3, 1979. Published January 27, 1981.
  14. Hull CW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US Patent 4,575,330. Filed Aug 8, 1984. Published March 11, 1986.
  15. Deckard C. Method and apparatus for producing parts by selective sintering. U.S. Patent 4,863,538, Filed October 17, 1986. Published September 5, 1989.
  16. McGurk M, Amis AA, Potamianos P, et al. Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1997;79:169-74.
  17. Sailer HF, Haers PE, Zollikofer CP, et al. The value of stereolithographic models for preoperative diagnosis of craniofacial deformities and planning of surgical corrections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;27:327-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(98)80059-3
  18. Santler G, Karcher H, Ruda C. Indications and limitations of three-dimensional models in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26:11-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80029-2
  19. Joffe JM, McDermott PJ, Linney AD, et al. Computer-generated titanium cranioplasty: report of a new technique for repairing skull defects. Br J Neurosurg 1992;6:343-50. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688699209023793
  20. Binder WJ, Kaye A. Reconstruction of posttraumatic and congenital facial deformities with three-dimensional computer- assisted custom-designed implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;94:775-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199411000-00004
  21. Tanaka Y, Matsumoto K, Song S, et al. Reconstruction of a cranial bone defect with hydroxyapatite and free flap transfer. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8:141-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199703000-00015
  22. Fukuta F, Jackson IT, McEwan CM, et al. Three- dimensional imaging in craniofacial surgery: a review of the role mirror image production. Eur J Plast Surg 1990;13:209-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00634571
  23. Altobelli DE, Kikinis R, Mulliken JB, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993;92:576-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199309001-00003
  24. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW. Three-dimensional measurement accuracy of skull surface landmarks. Am J Phys Anthropol 1988;76:497-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330760409
  25. Hildebolt CF, Vannier MW, Knapp RH. Validation study of skull three-dimensional computerized tomography measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 1990;82:283-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330820307
  26. Lo LJ, Marsh JL, Vannier MW, et al. Craniofacial computerassisted surgical planning and simulation. Clin Plast Surg 1994;21:501-16.
  27. Cavalcanti MG, Vannier MW. Quantitative analysis of spiral computed tomography for craniofacial clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:344-50. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600389
  28. Lo LJ, Lin WY, Wong HF, et al. Quantitative measurement on three-dimensional computed tomography: an experimental validation using phantom objects. Chang Gung Med J 2000;23:354-9.
  29. Cavalcanti MG, Rocha SS, Vannier MW. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33: 170-6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/13603271
  30. Lopes PM, Moreira CR, Perrella A, et al. 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:224-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.08.036
  31. Moreira CR, Sales MA, Lopes PM, et al. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional conebeam computed tomographic images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108:430-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.01.032
  32. Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, et al. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from conebeam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:17.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(09)01169-X
  33. Fleming PS, Marinho V, Johal A. Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res 2011;14:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01503.x
  34. Cynthia DB, Steven S, Anil M, et al. A survey of interactive mesh-cutting techniques and a new method for implementing generalized interactive mesh cutting using virtual tools. J Visual Comput Animat 2002;13:21-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/vis.275
  35. Zachow S, Gladilina E, Saderb R, et al. Draw and cut: intuitive 3D osteotomy planning on polygonal bone models. Int Congr Ser 2003;1256:362-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5131(03)00272-3
  36. Westermark A, Zachow S, Eppley BL. Three-dimensional osteotomy planning in maxillofacial surgery including soft tissue prediction. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:100-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200501000-00019
  37. Lane C, Harrell W Jr. Completing the 3-dimensional picture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:612-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.023
  38. Chua CK, Chou SM, Ng WS, et al. An integrated experimental approach to link a laser digitiser, a CAD/CAM system and a rapid prototyping system for biomedical applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1998;14:110-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01322219
  39. Xia JJ, Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF. Three-dimensional computer- aided surgical simulation for maxillofacial surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2005;13:25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2004.10.004
  40. MIMICS version 12 reference guide. Leuven (BE): Materialise N.V.; 2009.

피인용 문헌

  1. A Binarization Preprocessing Method for the Three‐Dimensional Reconstruction of Carotids vol.19, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.12153
  2. Computer-aided resection and endoprosthesis design for the management of malignant bone tumors around the knee: outcomes of 12 cases vol.14, pp.None, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-331
  3. Prototyping: Major Advance in Surgical Planning and Customizing Prostheses in Patients with Bone Tumors of the Head and Neck vol.4, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2013.47a1001
  4. Correction of Orbital Wall Fracture Close to the Optic Canal Using Computer-Assisted Navigation Surgery vol.24, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0b013e318290266a
  5. Three-dimensional virtual operations can facilitate complicated surgical planning for the treatment of patients with jaw deformities associated with facial asymmetry: a case report vol.5, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.48
  6. Biomaterials for Craniofacial Bone Engineering vol.93, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514547271
  7. The principles of tissue engineering and its recent advances and future prospects vol.57, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2014.57.2.145
  8. Use of prototyping in preoperative planning for patients with head and neck tumors vol.36, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23540
  9. Impact of surgical innovation on tissue repair in the surgical patient vol.102, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9672
  10. Rapid prototyping-assisted maxillofacial reconstruction vol.47, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2015.1007520
  11. A Three-Dimensional Statistical Average Skull: Application of Biometric Morphing in Generating Missing Anatomy vol.26, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000001869
  12. Update of patient-specific maxillofacial implant vol.23, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0000000000000175
  13. Applications of medical rapid prototyping assisted customized surgical guides in complex surgeries vol.22, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-02-2015-0021
  14. A comparison study on the design of mirror and anatomy reconstruction technique in maxillofacial region vol.24, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3233/thc-161136
  15. Single-staged resections and 3D reconstructions of the nasion, glabella, medial orbital wall, and frontal sinus and bone: Long-term outcome and review of the literature vol.7, pp.44, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.196773
  16. The Role of Virtual Surgical Planning in the Era of Robotic Surgery vol.57, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.1.265
  17. Contemporary Correction of Dentofacial Anomalies: A Clinical Assessment vol.4, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj4020011
  18. Statistical Analysis of Interactive Surgical Planning Using Shape Descriptors in Mandibular Reconstruction with Fibular Segments vol.11, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161524
  19. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report vol.9, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2147/imcrj.s118139
  20. Scapular flap for maxillectomy defect reconstruction and preliminary results using three-dimensional modeling : Maxillectomy Reconstruction and 3D Modeling vol.127, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26351
  21. Use and Evaluation of Patient-Specific Titanium Implant for Delayed Repair of Posttraumatic Frontonasoethmoidal and Supraorbital Bone Defect vol.1, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1601483
  22. Automated Planning With Multivariate Shape Descriptors for Fibular Transfer in Mandibular Reconstruction vol.64, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2016.2621742
  23. Computer-aided position planning of miniplates to treat facial bone defects vol.12, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182839
  24. Virtual Preoperative Simulation for Excision of Spinal Tumors: Surgeon Processing of Medical Computer-Assisted Design Software vol.14, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14245/kjs.2017.14.4.170
  25. Virtual Surgical Planning: The Pearls and Pitfalls vol.6, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000001443
  26. Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics vol.13, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1674-6
  27. Recent advances in the reconstruction of cranio-maxillofacial defects using computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing vol.40, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-018-0141-9
  28. Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Cutting Guides in Eminoplasty for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Dislocation : vol.30, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000005143
  29. The Drilling Guiding Templates and Pre-Bent Titanium Plates Improves the Operation Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgery With Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Occlusal Splints for Pat vol.30, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000005656
  30. A Simplified Digital Workflow for the Treatment of Pediatric Mandibular Fractures Using Three-Dimensional (3D) Printed Cap Splint: A Case Report vol.3, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1694765
  31. Navigation-guided fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction: A proof of concept study vol.72, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2019.01.026
  32. Digital imaging evaluation of the scapula for prediction of endosteal implant placement in reconstruction of oromandibular defects with scapular free flaps vol.39, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30466
  33. Segmentation of dental cone‐beam CT scans affected by metal artifacts using a mixed‐scale dense convolutional neural network vol.46, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13793
  34. Combined application of virtual surgery and 3D printing technology in postoperative reconstruction of head and neck cancers vol.19, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-019-0616-3
  35. Simplifying Facial Feminization Surgery Using Virtual Modeling on the Female Skull vol.8, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002618
  36. The Using Virtual Computer-Assisted Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.20, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1590/pboci.2020.064
  37. Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public vol.13, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1943387520911873
  38. Using a 3D Printed “Phantom of the Opera” Soft Tissue Surgical Guide for Complex Facial Reconstruction vol.1, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/2732501620949198
  39. Fit Accuracy of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated with CAD/CAM, Rapid Prototyping, and Conventional Techniques: A Systematic Review vol.2021, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3194433
  40. A Brief Review on the Evolution of Metallic Dental Implants: History, Design, and Application vol.8, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2021.646383
  41. The development of computer‐aided patient‐specific template design software for 3D printing in cranio‐maxillofacial surgery vol.17, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2243
  42. Cranial Implant Design Applying Shape-Based Interpolation Method via Open-Source Software vol.11, pp.16, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167604
  43. Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows - possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments vol.50, pp.7, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210268
  44. Maxillofacial surgical simulation system with haptic feedback vol.17, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2020137