DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nutritional status of patients treated with radiotherapy as determined by subjective global assessment

  • Koom, Woong Sub (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Seung Do (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Song, Si Yeol (Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Chang Geol (Department of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Moon, Sung Ho (Department of Radiation Oncology, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Chie, Eui Kyu (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Hong Seok (Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Young-Taek (Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Ho Sun (Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System) ;
  • Keum, Ki Chang (Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2012.08.23
  • Accepted : 2012.09.21
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective multi-institutional study was to evaluate the nutritional status of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for treatment of head and neck, lung, or gastrointestinal cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,000 patients were enrolled in this study at seven different hospitals in Seoul, Korea between October 2009 and May 2010. The nutritional status of patients after receiving 3 weeks of RT was evaluated using subjective global assessment (SGA). The nutritional status of each patient was rated as well nourished (A), moderately malnourished (B), or severely malnourished (C). Results: The mean age of patients in this study was $59.4{\pm}11.9$ years, and the male to female ratio was 7:3. According to the SGA results, 60.8%, 34.5%, and 4.7% of patients were classified as A, B, or C, respectively. The following criteria were significantly associated with malnutrition (SGA B or C; p < 0.001): loss of subcutaneous fat or muscle wasting (odds ratio [OR], 11.473); increased metabolic demand/stress (OR, 8.688); ankle, sacral edema, or ascites (OR, 3.234); and weight loss ${\geq}5%$ (OR, 2.299). Conclusion: SGA was applied successfully to assess the nutritional status of most patients. The prevalence of malnutrition in a radiation oncology department was 39.2%. The results of this study serve as a basis for implementation of nutrition intervention to patients being treated at radiation oncology departments.

Keywords

References

  1. Laviano A, Meguid MM. Nutritional issues in cancer management. Nutrition 1996;12:358-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(96)80061-X
  2. Ollenschlager G, Viell B, Thomas W, Konkol K, Burger B. Tumor anorexia: causes, assessment, treatment. Recent Results Cancer Res 1991;121:249-59.
  3. Ottery FD. Cancer cachexia: prevention, early diagnosis, and management. Cancer Pract 1994;2:123-31.
  4. Nitenberg G, Raynard B. Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2000;34:137-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-8428(00)00048-2
  5. Ottery FD. Defi nition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition 1996; 12:S15-9.
  6. Rivadeneira DE, Evoy D, Fahey TJ 3rd, Lieberman MD, Daly JM. Nutritional support of the cancer patient. CA Cancer J Clin 1998;48:69-80. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.48.2.69
  7. Ottery FD. Rethinking nutritional support of the cancer patient: the new field of nutritional oncology. Semin Oncol 1994;21:770-8.
  8. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1987;11:8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/014860718701100108
  9. Bauer J, Capra S, Ferguson M. Use of the scored Patient- Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) as a nutrition assessment tool in patients with cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002;56:779-85. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601412
  10. Duerksen DR, Yeo TA, Siemens JL, O'Connor MP. The validity and reproducibility of clinical assessment of nutritional status in the elderly. Nutrition 2000;16:740-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(00)00398-1
  11. Ferguson ML, Bauer J, Gallagher B, Capra S, Christie DR, Mason BR. Validation of a malnutrition screening tool for patients receiving radiotherapy. Australas Radiol 1999;43:325-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.433665.x
  12. Thoresen L, Fjeldstad I, Krogstad K, Kaasa S, Falkmer UG. Nutritional status of patients with advanced cancer: the value of using the subjective global assessment of nutritional status as a screening tool. Palliat Med 2002;16:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216302pm486oa
  13. Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, Burrows J, Lis CG, Grutsch JF. Prognostic significance of Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005;59:35-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602029
  14. Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, Dahlk SL, Lis CG. Can subjective global assessment of nutritional status predict survival in ovarian cancer? J Ovarian Res 2008;1:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-1-5
  15. Gupta D, Lis CG, Granick J, Grutsch JF, Vashi PG, Lammersfeld CA. Malnutrition was associated with poor quality of life in colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2006;59:704-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.020
  16. Capra S, Ferguson M, Ried K. Cancer: impact of nutrition intervention outcome - nutrition issues for patients. Nutrition 2001;17:769-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00632-3
  17. Isenring EA, Capra S, Bauer JD. Nutrition intervention is beneficial in oncology outpatients receiving radiotherapy to the gastrointestinal or head and neck area. Br J Cancer2004;91:447-52.
  18. Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Camilo ME. Does nutrition influence quality of life in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy? Radiother Oncol 2003;67:213-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00040-9
  19. Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Marques Vidal P, Camilo ME. Impact of nutrition on outcome: a prospective randomized controlled trial in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Head Neck 2005;27:659-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20221
  20. Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Vidal PM, Camilo ME. Dietary counseling improves patient outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in colorectal cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:1431-8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.02.054
  21. Van Cutsem E, Arends J. The causes and consequences of cancer-associated malnutrition. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2005;9Suppl 2:S51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2005.09.007
  22. Isenring EA, Bauer JD, Capra S. Nutrition support using the American Dietetic Association medical nutrition therapy protocol for radiation oncology patients improves dietary intake compared with standard practice. J Am Diet Assoc 2007;107:404-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.12.007
  23. Unsal D, Mentes B, Akmansu M, Uner A, Oguz M, Pak Y. Evaluation of nutritional status in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a prospective study. Am J Clin Oncol 2006;29:183-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.coc.0000198745.94757.ee
  24. Marin Caro MM, Laviano A, Pichard C. Nutritional intervention and quality of life in adult oncology patients. Clin Nutr 2007;26:289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2007.01.005
  25. Ottery FD. Supportive nutrition to prevent cachexia and improve quality of life. Semin Oncol 1995;22:98-111.
  26. Makhija S, Baker J. The subjective global assessment: a review of its use in clinical practice. Nutr Clin Pract 2008;23:405-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533608321214
  27. Barbosa-Silva MC, Barros AJ. Indications and limitations of the use of subjective global assessment in clinical practice: an update. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2006;9:263-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mco.0000222109.53665.ed
  28. Isenring E, Bauer J, Capra S. The scored Patient-generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and its association with quality of life in ambulatory patients receiving radiotherapy. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57:305-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601552
  29. Duerksen DR. Teaching medical students the subjective global assessment. Nutrition 2002;18:313-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00801-2

Cited by

  1. Prevalence of Malnutrition and Current Use of Nutrition Support in Cancer Patient Study vol.38, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607113506940
  2. Effect of a specific supplement enriched with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and metabolic status of ear, nose and throat cancer patients vol.31, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2806
  3. Screening for malnutrition in lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy vol.22, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-013-2116-9
  4. Evaluation of nutritional status in head and neck radio-treated patients affected by oral mucositis: efficacy of class IV laser therapy vol.22, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2155-x
  5. Evaluation of nutritional status in head and neck radio-treated patients affected by oral mucositis: efficacy of class IV laser therapy vol.22, pp.7, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2155-x
  6. Long-term effects of varying consumption of ω3 fatty acids in ear, nose and throat cancer patients: assessment 1 year after radiotherapy vol.66, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3109/09637486.2014.953453
  7. Severe weight loss during preoperative chemoradiotherapy compromises survival outcome for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer vol.142, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-016-2225-1
  8. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) Score Could Be a Predictive Factor for Radiation Pneumonitis in Lung Cancer Patients With Normal Pulmonary Function Treated by Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy vol.19, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2017.09.001
  9. Nutritional Risk Screening and Assessment vol.8, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071065
  10. Toxicities Caused by Head and Neck Cancer Treatments and Their Influence on the Development of Malnutrition: Review of the Literature vol.10, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10040066
  11. Factors influencing non-adherence to radiotherapy: a retrospective audit of 1,548 patients from a tertiary cancer centre vol.19, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1460396919000840
  12. Impact of cervical cancer on the sexual and physical health of women diagnosed with cervical cancer in Ghana: A qualitative phenomenological study vol.17, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/17455065211066075
  13. Nutritional Deficiencies in Radiotherapy-Treated Head and Neck Cancer Patients vol.10, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10040574