DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Assessment Results and Problem in the Items of the Housing Performance Grading Indication System

주택성능등급 인정항목의 평가결과 및 문제점 분석

  • 이성옥 (한국건설기술연구원, 연세대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 배철학 (한국시설안전공단, 경북대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2012.09.06
  • Published : 2012.11.25

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze problems and suggest improvements via a status analysis of evaluation criteria and a method for three years after revisions to the standard of the Housing Performance Grading Indication System. The grade distribution works of four accreditation authorities were searched for grading distribution by performance item for 144 cases acknowledged for a 'new standard' (revised standard). It was revealed that 'unequal distribution', in which only certain grading was focused on, and 'no-grading', in which specific grading was not shown occurred on 17 items amongst the entire 27 performance items. The items shown only in 'unequal distribution' were generated for crime prevention content and horizontal evacuation distance. Only 'no grading' items were generated in seven items, which were heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation, remodeling & maintenance(common space), daylight, home networks, fire detection & warning facilities, smoke release & evacuation facilities, and so on. Items in which both 'unequal distribution' and 'no grading' were generated include noise emission in bathrooms, outside noise in sound insulation-related grading, remodeling & maintenance(private space), durability, and application of low emission product, ventilation performance for household units, consideration for the socially underprivileged, such as the elderly, etc. (private space), fire resistance performance. A commonly used method was applied to the evaluation criteria of each performance item in which 'unequal distribution' occurred for construction, and this is grading can be acknowledged without much difficulty. This shows that the housing performance grading acknowledgement criteria is lacking in discrimination from others. Evaluation criteria not showing **** amongst the evaluation criteria of each performance item shows that it is a criteria that is quite difficult to acknowledge for performance grading, and items not occurring * shows that a construction method was applied, which is basically applied to current apartment housing, and thus has no discrimination from others.

Keywords

References

  1. 건설교통부고시 제2006-14호 주택성능등급 인정 및 관리기준
  2. 건설교통부고시 제2007-314호 주택품질 향상에 따른 가산 비용 기준
  3. 국토해양부고시 제2008-539호 주택성능등급 인정 및 관리 기준
  4. 국토해양부고시 제2009-659호, 제2009-1013호 주택품질 향상에 따른 가산비용 기준
  5. 국토해양부고시 제2009-1191호 주택성능등급 인정 및 관리 기준
  6. 김수암, 양관섭, 이세현, 이윤규, 임석호, 이문환, 황은경, 유기형, 장대희, 이성옥, 주택성능등급표시제도의 발전방안 연구, 한국건설기술연구원, 2008
  7. 정윤혜, 김종엽, 백혜선, 송옥희, 친환경 공동주택 인증단지 평가 득점분석을 통한 인증지표 개선에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회논문집, 28(2), 2012
  8. 이성옥, 배철학, 주택성능등급표시제도의 개선을 위한 인정 단지의 사업계획변경 현황에 대한 실태조사 연구, 한국생태환경건축학회논문집, 11(6), 2011
  9. 이성옥, 주택성능등급 인정 사례의 부문별 평가 결과 분석, 한국생태환경건축학회논문집, 10(6), 2010
  10. Lee. S. O., Characteristics and Time-Series Status by the Analysis of Korea''s Housing Performance Grading Indication System, SET 2010,
  11. 주택성능등급 인정센터, www.goodhuosing.or.kr
  12. 田極義明, 阿久津 智, 塚越俊男, 平山信雄(2004), わかる!住宅の性能と評価, 出版局 オー厶社, 日本
  13. 社団法人日本建設業経營協會 中央技術研究所(2002), 日建経式オープンハウジング久が原プ口ジェクト, 日本