DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A survey study on recognition of periapical radiography in dental hygiene students

치위생과 학생의 치근단 촬영법 인식에 관한 조사 연구

  • Received : 2012.07.28
  • Accepted : 2012.10.20
  • Published : 2012.10.30

Abstract

Objectives : This study was carried out in order to obtain basic data for students' efficient acquirement and instruction of radiography technology in the future by surveying dental hygiene students' recognition of periapical radiography. Methods : This study carried out a questionnaire survey targeting dental hygiene students from December 2009 to December 2010, and obtained the following results. Results : 1. As a result of examining recognition on periapical radiography, the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be averagely $3.84{\pm}0.566$ points. The paralleling technique was indicated to be $2.66{\pm}0.701$ points. 2. As a result of examining about problems given the bisecting angle technique, what had been most difficult given the bisecting angle technique was indicated to be the highest in cone positioning with 34.2%. The most difficulty given deciding on the X-ray vertical-angel irradiation direction was indicated to be the highest with 66.9% in adjusting the cone direction on the virtual bisector. 3. As a result of examining about problems given the paralleling technique, what had been most difficult in the process of the paralleling technique was indicated to be the highest with 56.7% in fixing the film immobilization device inside the mouth. Conclusions : Examining the above results, it is considered that there is a need of understanding morphological and anatomical structure inside the mouth in order to reduce the mistake rate given the periapical radiography, and that it is important to increase skill level by repetitively shooting several times with having enough time.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim HK, Kim HY, Park JI, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and activity of dental hygienist about radiographic quality assurance. J Korean Acad Dent Health 2010;34(2):273-281.
  2. Park CS, Kang EJ, Kang JK, et al. Oral imaging. Version 1. Seoul:Gomunsa;2009:165.
  3. Lee KH, Park IS, Jung JO. A comparative study on rate of error with bisecting angle technique and paralleling technique. J Dent Hyg Sci 2011;11(3):155-161.
  4. Lee YA, Jo MJ. Comparison of the rate of error with the bisecting angle technique and the paralleling technique. J Dent Hyg Sci 2004;4(3):97-102.
  5. Shin DM, Lee SR. Statute book of health and medical treatment. Seoul:Hakmunsa; 2003:53.
  6. Park YD, Kang JO, Kim MA, et al. Medical laws relation. Version 8. Seoul: DaehanNarae publishing;2009:253-254.
  7. Kang EJ, Lee KH, Ju OJ. A study on the environmental condition and safety in dental radiographic room. J Dent Hyg Sci 2005;5(2):83-88.
  8. Crandell CE. Cause and frequency of intraoral X-ray errors by dental hygiene student. J Dent Educ 1971;22(1):189-196.
  9. Jang GW. Analysis on practice of dental radiology in dental hygiene students. Research bulletin of Chinju junior college of nursing & health 2004;25(2):1-9.
  10. Choi KS, Byun CS, Choi SC. Technical errors in complete mouth radiographic surveys according to radiographic techniques and film holding methods. Imaging Science in Dentistry. 1986;16(1):103-112.
  11. Ahn GS, Kim HJ. Analysis of oral radiography practice. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2011;11(5):783-790.
  12. Cho BJ. Entrepreneurship education. Curricuuim development & effective instructional method. Management education review 1998;2(2):27-48.
  13. Association of Korean professors of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Clinical prectice of oral and maxillofacial radiology. 2nd ed. Seoul:Narae Publishing, Inc.;2002:5-7.
  14. Choi YS, Kim JK, Jang JH, Park YD. A literature review on expansion of dental hygienists' radiography operations. J Korean Acad Dent Hyg Educ 2009;9(2): 111-124.
  15. Van Aken J. Optimum conditions for intraoral roentgenograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1969;27:475-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90073-5
  16. Manson-Hing LR. What's the angle?, a study of the angle bisected in intraoral radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1980;49(1):86-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(80)90036-5