Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pitch and Formant Trajectories of English Vowels by American Males with Different Speaking Styles

발화방식에 따른 미국인 남성 영어모음의 피치와 포먼트 궤적

  • Received : 2012.01.25
  • Accepted : 2012.03.12
  • Published : 2012.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Many previous studies reported acoustic parameters of English vowels produced by a clear speaking style. In everyday usage, we actually produce speech sounds with various speaking styles. Different styles may yield different acoustic measurements. This study attempts to examine pitch and formant trajectories of eleven English vowels produced by nine American males in order to understand acoustic variations depending on clear and conversational speaking styles. The author used Praat to obtain trajectories systematically at seven equidistant time points over the vowel segment while checking measurement validity. Results showed that pitch trajectories indicated distinct patterns depending on four speaking styles. Generally, higher pitch values were observed in the higher vowels and the pitch was higher in the clear speaking styles than that in the conversational styles. The same trend was observed in the three formant trajectories of front vowels and the first formant trajectories of back vowels. The second and third trajectories of back vowels revealed an opposite or inconsistent trend, which might be attributable to the coarticulation of the following consonant or lip rounding gestures. The author made a tentative conclusion that people tend to produce vowels to enhance pitch and formant differences to transmit their information clearly. Further perceptual studies on synthesized vowels with varying pitch and formant values are desirable to address the conclusion.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang, B. (2008a). Formant measurements of complex waves and vowels produced by students, Speech Sciences, Vol. 15, No. 3, 39-52. (양병곤 (2008a). 복합음과 대학생이 발음한 모음 포먼트 측정, 음성과학, 15권 3호, 39-52.)
  2. Yang, B. (2008b). English pronunciation: A new approach using a computer. Busan: PNU Press. (양병곤 (2008b). 영어발음: 컴퓨터를 활용한 새로운 접근. 부 산: 부산대학교출판부.)
  3. Yang, B. (2009). Formant trajectories of English vowels produced by American males, Phonetics and Speech Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 3, 65-72.(양병곤 (2009). 미국인 남성이 발음한 영어모음의 포먼트 궤적, 말소리와 음성과학, 1권 3호, 65-72.)
  4. Delattre, P. C., Liberman, A. M. & Cooper, F. S. (1955). Acoustic loci and transitional cues for consonants, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 27, 769-773. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1908024
  5. Fant, G. 1973. Speech sounds and features. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  6. Ferguson, S. H. & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 112, 259-71. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1482078
  7. Ferguson, S. H. (2004). Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 116, 2365-2373. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1788730
  8. Harnsberger, J., Wright, R. & Pisoni, D. (2008). A new method for eliciting three speaking styles in the laboratory, Speech Communication, Vol. 50, 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2007.11.001
  9. Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J. & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 97, No. 5, 3099-3111. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411872
  10. Krause, J. C. & Braida, L. D. (2002). Investigating alternative forms of clear speech: The effects of speaking rate and speaking mode on intelligibility, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 112, 2165-2172. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1509432
  11. Liberman, M. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1984). Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length." In M. Aronoff, & R. T. Oehrle (Eds.), Language, sound, structure: Studies in phonology presented to Morris Halle by his teacher and students (157-223). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  12. Peterson, G. & Barney, H. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 24, 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906875
  13. Pickett, J. (1987). The sounds of speech communication: A primer of acoustic phonetics and speech perception. Austin, Texas: pro-ed.
  14. Smiljanic, R. & Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 118, 1677-1688. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000788
  15. Smiljanić, R. & Bradlow, A. R. (2010). Speaking and hearing clearly: Talker and listener factors in speaking style changes, Language Linguist Compass, Vol. 3, No. 1, 236-264.
  16. Smith, C. (2007). Prosodic accommodation by French speakers to a non-native interlocutor, Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrucken, Germany.
  17. Truckenbrodt, H. (2004). Final lowering in non-final position, Journal of Phonetics, 32, 313-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2003.11.001
  18. Uther, M., Knoll, M. & Burnham, D. (2007). Do you speak E-N-G-L-I-S-H? A comparison of foreigner- and infant-directed speech, Speech Communication, Vol. 49, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2006.10.003
  19. Wassink, A., Wright, R. & Franklin, A. (2006). Intraspeaker variability in vowel production: an investigation of motherese, hyperspeech, and Lombard speech in Jamaican speakers, Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 35, 363-379.
  20. Whalen, D. H. & Levitt, A. G. (1995). The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels, Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 23, 349-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0
  21. Whalen, D. H., Levitt, A. G. Hsiao, P. -L. & Smorodinsky, I. (1995). Intrinsic F0 of vowels in the babbling of 6-, 9- and 12-month-old French- and English-learning infants, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 97, 2533-2539. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411973
  22. Whalen, D. H., Magen, H. S., Pouplier, M., Kang, A. M., & Isakarous, K. (2004). Vowel production and perception: Hyperarticulation without a hyperspace effect, Language and Speech, Vol. 47, No. 2, 155-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470020301
  23. Yang, B. (1990). Development of vowel normalization procedures: English and Korean. Ph. D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
  24. Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of English and Korean monophthongs produced by male and female speakers, Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 24, 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013
  25. Yang, B. (2006). Discrimination of synthesized English vowels by American and Korean listeners, Speech Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 1, 7-27.
  26. Yang, B. (2010). Formant trajectories of English high tense and lax vowels produced by Korean and American speakers, Korean Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 35, No. 2, 407-423. https://doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2010.35.2.005
  27. Zwicker, E. & Terhardt, E. (1980). Analytical expressions for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 68, 1523-1525. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385079

Cited by

  1. Spectral Characteristics and Formant Bandwidths of English Vowels by American Males with Different Speaking Styles vol.6, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.4.091