Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Domain Analysis on Economics by Utilizing Cocitation Analysis of Multiple Authorship

복수저자기반 동시인용분석을 활용한 지적구조 분석: 경제학 분야를 중심으로

  • 곽선영 (이화여자대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 정은경 (이화여자대학교 사회과학대학 문헌정보전공)
  • Received : 2012.02.18
  • Accepted : 2012.03.16
  • Published : 2012.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The author co-citation analysis is generally based on the frequency of the first author because most citation databases include only the first author in the bibliographic information. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to provide a better knowledge structure by utilizing the multiple authorship of author co-citation analysis. To achieve the purpose of this study, four different data sets are prepared: (1) counting the first author, (2) counting all the author without limiting the total frequency, (3) counting all the author with limiting the total frequency, and (4) counting adjusted frequencies based on the order of author subscription. The findings of this study show that there are clear differences between the knowledge structure counting all the author and the one counting only the first author. In addition, depending on the different methods, there are subtle changes of cluster members for authors.

전통적인 저자동시인용분석은 인용색인 데이터베이스가 색인하는 제 1저자만을 대상으로 하기 때문에 제1저자 이외의 저자의 기여도가 제외된다는 한계를 지니고 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 경제학 분야를 대상으로하여 복수저자기반의 저자동시인용분석을 활용하여 해당 학문분야의 지적구조를 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 네 가지 실험집단을 구성하였다. (1) 인용된 문헌의 제 1저자만을 고려한 저자동시인용분석, (2) 문헌당 총합 제한 없이 복수저자에게 동일한 인용빈도 부여한 저자동시인용분석, (3) 문헌당 총 합을 제한하여 인용빈도를 부여한 저자동시인용분석, (4) 저자기입 순서를 고려하여 인용빈도를 부여한 저자동시인용분석. 본 연구의 결과는 크게 제 1저자만 고려한 방식과 복수저자를 모두 고려한 방식에 따라 군집형성에 있어서 차이를 보였다. 또한 복수저자의 인용빈도를 구하는 방식에 따라서 군집의 소속이 달라지는 변화를 찾아볼 수 있다. 이러한 결과는 공동저작이 증가하는 학문적 추세에 비추어서 학문의 지적구조를 밝히기 위해서는 복수저자가 고려된 저자동시인용분석이 중요하다는 점을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김도미 (1993). 저자동시인용 분석과 인용한 문헌의 색인어 분석에 의한 지적 구조의 규명. 정보관리연구, 24(1), 32-57.(Kim, Do-Mi (1993). A study on intellectual structure using author co-citation analysis and indexing term analysis of citing documents: Application to economics. Journal of Information Management, 24(1), 32-57.)
  2. 김영진 (1986). 논문의 동시인용을 통한 지적구조의 규명에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 3(1), 103-135.(Kim, Y. (1986). A study on the intellectual structure using cocitation analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 3(1), 103-135.)
  3. 김희전, 조현양 (2010). 저자동시인용분석과 저자서지결합분석에 의한 지적 구조 분석. 정보관리학회지, 27(3), 283-306. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.201.27.3.283(Kim, Hee-Jeon, & Cho, Hyun-Yang (2010). A study on intellectual structure using author co-citation analysis and author bibliographic coupling analysis in the field of social welfare science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3), 283-306. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.201.27.3.283)
  4. 민윤경 (1992). 저자동시인용분석에 의한 경영학 분야의 지적구조 규명에 관한 연구. 석사학위논문, 이화여자대학교 대학원.(Min, Yoon-Kyung (1992). A study of intellectual structure of Korean business administration and management using author co-citation analysis. Unpublished master thesis, Ewha Womans University.)
  5. 유종덕, 최은주 (2011). 저자프로파일링분석과 저자동시인용분석의 유용성 비교 검증. 정보관리학회지, 28(1), 123-144. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.201.28.1.123(Ryoo, Jong-Duk, Choi, Eun-Ju (2011). A comparison test on the potential utility between author profiling analysis (APA) and author co-citation analysis (ACA). Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(1): 123-144. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.201.28.1.123)
  6. 이종욱, 양기덕 (2011). 교수연구업적 평가법의 계량적 분석. 정보관리학회지. 28(4), 119-140. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.119(Lee, Jongwook, & Yang, Kiduk (2011). A bibliometric analysis of faculty research performance assessment methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 28(4), 119-140. doi: 10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.4.119)
  7. 이은숙, 정영미 (2002). 복수저자를 고려한 동시인용분석 연구: 정보학과 컴퓨터과학을 대상으로. 지식처리연구, 3(2), 1-26.(Chung, Young Mee & Lee, Eun Sook (2002). A co-citation analysis of multiple authorship in the subject field of Information Science and Computer Science, Journal of Knowledge Processing and Management, 3(2), 1-26.)
  8. 이재윤 (2007). 지적 구조 분석을 위한 MDS 지도 작성 방식의 비교 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(2), 335-357.(Lee, Jae Yun (2007). A comparison analysis of various approaches to multidimensional scaling in mapping a knowledge domain's intellectual structure. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(2), 335-357.)
  9. Bayer, A. E., Smart, J. C., & McLaughlin, G. W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 444-452. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<444::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-J
  10. Blaug, M., & Vane, H. R. (2003). Who's Who in Economics (4th ed.). Northampton, Messachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
  11. Eom, S. (2008). All author cocitation analysis and first author cocitation analysis: A comparative empirical investigation. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.09.001
  12. Fletcher, J. (1972). A view of the literature of economics. Journal of Documentation, 28(4), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026544
  13. Howard, G. S., Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. H. (1987). Research productivity in psychology based on publication in the journals of American Psychology Association, American Psychologist, 42(11), 975-986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.42.11.975
  14. Laband, David N., & Tollison, Robert D. (2000). Intellectual collaboration. Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), 632-662. https://doi.org/10.1086/262132
  15. McCain, K. (1983). The author cocitation structure of macroeconomics. Scientometrics, 5(5), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02147224
  16. McCain, K. W. (1984). Longitudinal author cocitation mapping: The changing structure of macroeconomics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(6), 351-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630350607
  17. McCain, K. W. (1986). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198605)37:3<111::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-D
  18. McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433-443. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<433::AID-ASI11>3.0.CO;2-Q
  19. Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co-citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.659
  20. Paisley, W. (1990). An oasis where many trails cross: The improbable cocitation networks of a multidiscipline. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<459::AID-ASI14>3.0.CO;2-5
  21. Persson, O. (2001). All author citations versus first author citations. Scientometrics, 50(2), 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010534009428
  22. Schneider, J., Larsen, B., & Ingwersen, P. (2009). A comparative study of first and all-author co-citation counting, and two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 80(1), 103-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2019-y

Cited by

  1. An Analysis of the Intellectual Structure of the LIS Field: Using Journal Co-citation Analysis vol.24, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.4.099
  2. A Comparative Analysis on Multiple Authorship Counting for Author Co-citation Analysis vol.31, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.2.057