DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of uplift on liquid storage tanks during earthquakes

  • Ormeno, Miguel (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering) ;
  • Larkin, Tam (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering) ;
  • Chouw, Nawawi (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Auckland, Faculty of Engineering)
  • Received : 2012.09.20
  • Accepted : 2012.11.08
  • Published : 2012.12.25

Abstract

Previous investigations have demonstrated that strong earthquakes can cause severe damage or collapse to storage tanks. Theoretical studies by other researchers have shown that allowing the tank to uplift generally reduces the base shear and the base moment. This paper provides the necessary experimental confirmation of some of the numerical finding by other researchers. This paper reports on a series of experiments of a model tank containing water using a shake table. A comparison of the seismic behaviour of a fixed base system (tank with anchorage) and a system free to uplift (tank without anchorage) is considered. The six ground motions are scaled to the design spectrum provided by New Zealand Standard 1170.5 (2004) and a range of aspect ratios (height/radius) is considered. Measurements were made of the impulsive acceleration, the horizontal displacement of the top of the tank and uplift of the base plate. A preliminary comparison between the experimental results and the recommendations provided by the liquid storage tank design recommendations of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering is included. The measurement of anchorage forces required to avoid uplift under varying conditions will be discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. API (2007), Welded steel tanks for oil storage, API Standard 650, 11th Ed., American Petroleum Institute.
  2. Apostolou, M., Gazetas, G. and Garini, E. (2007), "Seismic response of slender rigid structures with foundation uplifting", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 27(7), 642-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.12.002
  3. Buckingham, E. (1914), "Illustrations of the use of dimensional analysis", Phys. Similar Syst. Phys. Rev., 4(4), 354-377.
  4. Cooper, T.W. (1997), A study of the performance of petroleum storage tanks during earthquakes, 1933-1995, NIST No. GCR 97-720, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburgh, Md.
  5. Haroun, M.A. (1983), "Behavior of unanchored oil storage tanks: imperial valley earthquake", J. Tech. Civil Eng.- ASCE, 109(1), 23-40.
  6. Housner, G.W. (1957), "Dynamic pressures on accelerated fluid containers", B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 47(1), 15-35.
  7. Housner, G.W. (1963), "The bevavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes", B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 53(2), 403-417.
  8. Huckelbridge, A.A. and Clough, R.W. (1977), "Seismic response of an uplifting building frame", J. Struct. Div., 104(8), 1211-1229.
  9. Ishida, K. and Kobayashi, N. (1988), "An effective method of analyzing rocking motion unanchored cylindrical tanks including uplift", J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 110(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3265572
  10. Kodama, T. and Chouw, N. (2002), "Soil-structure interaction with uplift due to near-source earthquakes", Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Structural Dynamics, September 2-5, T. U. Munchen, Germany.
  11. Larkin, T. (2008), "Seismic response of liquid storage tanks incorporating soil-structure interaction", J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 134(12), 1804-1814. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:12(1804)
  12. Loo, W., Quenneville, P. and Chouw, N. (2012), "A numerical study of the seismic behavior of timber shear walls with slip-friction connectors", Eng. Struct., 34, 233-243 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.09.016
  13. Malhotra, P.K. (2000), "Practical nonlinear seismic analysis of tanks", Earthq. Spectra., 16(2), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586122
  14. Malhotra, P.K. and Veletsos, A.S. (1994a), "Beam model for base uplifting analysis of cylindrical tanks", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 120(12), 3471-3488. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:12(3471)
  15. Malhotra, P.K. and Veletsos, A.S. (1994b), "Uplifting analysis of base plates in cylindrical tanks", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 120(12), 3489-3505. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:12(3489)
  16. Malhotra, P.K. and Veletsos, A.S. (1994c), "Uplifting response of unanchored liquid-storage tanks", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 120(12), 3525-3547. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:12(3525)
  17. Manos, G.C. and Clough, R.W. (1985), "Tank damage during the May 1983 Coalinga earthquake", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 13(4), 449-466. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290130403
  18. Meek, J.W. (1975), "Effects of foundation tipping on dynamic response", J. Struct. Div. - ASCE, 101(7), 1297-1311.
  19. New Zealand Standard NZS1170.5 (2004), Structural Design Actions, Part 5: Earthquake Actions - New Zealand, NZS.
  20. NZSEE (2009), Seismic design of storage tanks - Recommendations of a study group of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering.
  21. Ormeno, M., Larkin, T. and Chouw, N. (2012), "Comparison between standards for seismic design of liquid storage tanks with respect to soil-foundation-structure interaction and uplift", Bull. New Zealand Soc. Earthq. Eng., 45(1), 40-46.
  22. Oyarzo-Vera, C., McVerry, G. and and Ingham, J. (2012), "Seismic zonation and default suite of ground-motion records for time-history analysis in the north island of New Zealand", Earthq.Spectra, 28(2), 667-688. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000016
  23. Psycharis, I.N. (1983), "Dynamics of flexible systems with partial lift-off", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 11(4), 501-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290110405
  24. Qin, X., Chen, Y. and Chouw, N. (2012), "Effect of uplift and soil nonlinearity on plastic hinge development and induced vibrations in structures", Adv.Struct. Eng., (in print).
  25. Somerville, P., Smith, N., Graves, R. and Abrahamson, N (1997), "Modification of empirical record ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and direction effects of rupture directivity", Seismol. Res. Lett., 68(1), 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199
  26. Taniguchi, T. (2002), "Non-linear response analyses of rectangular rigid bodies subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motion", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31(8), 1481-1500. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.170
  27. Veletsos, A.S. (1984), Seismic response and design of liquid storage tanks, Guidelines for the seismic design of oil and gas pipeline systems, Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE, New York, 255-370.
  28. Veletsos, A.S., Tang, Y. and Tang, H.T. (1992), "Dynamic response of flexibly supported liquid-storage tanks", J. Struct. Eng.- ASCE, 118(1), 264-283. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:1(264)
  29. Wozniak, R.S. and Mitchell, W.W. (1978), Basis of seismic design provisions for welded steel oil storage tanks, API Refining 43rd Mid-Year Meeting, American Petroleum Institute (API), United States.

Cited by

  1. Impact of Vertical Ground Excitation on a Bridge with Footing Uplift vol.20, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1113450
  2. Investigation of the dynamic behaviour of a storage tank with different foundation types focusing on the soil-foundation-structure interactions using centrifuge model tests vol.46, pp.14, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2905
  3. Nonlinear numerical evaluation of large open-top aboveground steel welded liquid storage tanks excited by seismic loads vol.119, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2017.07.017
  4. Review of API 650 Annex E: Design of large steel welded aboveground storage tanks excited by seismic loads vol.112, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2016.11.013
  5. Design of LQR controller for active suspension system of Partially Filled Tank Cars vol.49, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.49.3.329
  6. The effect of seismic uplift on the shell stresses of liquid-storage tanks vol.44, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2568
  7. Seismic Analysis of Open-Top Storage Tanks With Flexible Foundation vol.141, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043373
  8. Rigid block coupled with a 2 d.o.f. system: Numerical and experimental investigation vol.9, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/csm.2020.9.6.539