DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Updating finite element model using dynamic perturbation method and regularization algorithm

  • 투고 : 2012.02.26
  • 심사 : 2012.05.28
  • 발행 : 2012.10.25

초록

An effective approach for updating finite element model is presented which can provide reliable estimates for structural updating parameters from identified operational modal data. On the basis of the dynamic perturbation method, an exact relationship between the perturbation of structural parameters such as stiffness change and the modal properties of the tested structure is developed. An iterative solution procedure is then provided to solve for the structural updating parameters that characterise the modifications of structural parameters at element level, giving optimised solutions in the least squares sense without requiring an optimisation method. A regularization algorithm based on the Tikhonov solution incorporating the generalised cross-validation method is employed to reduce the influence of measurement errors in vibration modal data and then to produce stable and reasonable solutions for the structural updating parameters. The Canton Tower benchmark problem established by the Hong Kong Polytechnic University is employed to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed model updating technique. The results from the benchmark problem studies show that the proposed technique can successfully adjust the reduced finite element model of the structure using only limited number of frequencies identified from the recorded ambient vibration measurements.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brownjohn, J.M.W. and Xia, P.Q. (2000), "Dynamic assessment of curved cable-stayed bridge by model updating", J. Struct. Eng. - ASCE, 126(2), 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:2(252)
  2. Caesar, B. and Peter, J. (1987), "Direct update of dynamic mathematical models from modal test data", AIAA J., 25(11), 1494-1499. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9810
  3. Chen, H.P. (2005), "Nonlinear perturbation theory for structural dynamic systems", AIAA J., 43(11), 2412-2421. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15207
  4. Chen, H.P. (2008), "Application of regularization method to damage detection in plane frame structures from incomplete noisy modal data", Eng. Struct., 30(11), 3219-3227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.04.038
  5. Chen, H.P. and Bicanic, N. (2010), "Identification of structural damage in buildings using iterative procedure and regularization method", Eng. Comput., 27(8), 930-950. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401011082962
  6. Chen, W.H., Lu, Z.R., Lin, W., Chen, S.H., Ni, Y.Q., Xia, Y. and Liao W.Y. (2011), "Theoretical and experimental modal analysis of the Guangzhou New TV Tower", Eng. Struct., 33(12), 3628-3646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.07.028
  7. De Roeck, G. and Peeters, B. (2011), MACEC3.1 - Modal Analysis on Civil Engineering Constructions, Department of Civil Engineering, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
  8. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B. and Shevitz, D.W. (1996), Damage Identification and Health Monitoring of Structural and Mechanical Systems from Changes in Their Vibration Characteristics: a Literature Review, Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, New Mexico, Report No. LA-13070-MS.
  9. Farhat, C. and Hemez, F.M. (1993), "Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by-element sensitivity methodology", AIAA J., 31(9), 1702-1711. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11833
  10. Friswell, M.I., Inman, D.J. and Pilkey, D.F. (1998), "Direct updating of damping and stiffness", AIAA J., 36(3), 491-493. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.396
  11. Friswell, M.I. and Mottershead, J.E. (1995), Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
  12. Golub, G.H., Heath, M. and Wahba, G. (1979), "Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter", Technometrics, 21(2), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489751
  13. Hu, N., Wang, X., Fukunaga, H., Yao, Z.H., Zhang, H.X. and Wu, Z.S. (2001), "Damage assessment of structures using modal test data", Int. J. Solids. Struct., 38(18), 3111-3126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00292-4
  14. Jaishi, B., Kim, H.J., Kim, M.K., Ren, W.X. and Lee, S.H. (2007), "Finite element model updating of concretefilled steel tubular arch bridge under operational condition using modal flexibility", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 21(6), 2406-2426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.01.003
  15. Kabe, A.M. (1985), "Stiffness matrix adjustment using modal data", AIAA J., 23(9), 1431-1436. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9103
  16. Ladeveze, P., Nedjar, D. and Reynier, M. (1994), "Updating of finite element models using vibration tests", AIAA J., 32(7), 1485-1491. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12219
  17. Link, M. (1999), "Updating of analytical models-Review of numerical procedures and application aspects", Proceedings of the Structural Dynamics Forum SD2000, Los Alamos, USA.
  18. Mottershead, J.E. and Friswell, M.I. (1993), "Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey", J. Sound Vib., 167(3), 347-375. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340
  19. Ni, Y.Q., Xia, Y., Liao, W.Y. and Ko, J.M. (2009), "Technology innovation in developing the structural health monitoring system for Guangzhou New TV Tower", Struct.Control Health Monit., 16(1), 73-98. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.303
  20. Ni, Y.Q., Xia, Y., Lin, W., Chen, W.H. and Ko, J.M. (2012), "SHM benchmark for high-rise structures: a reducedorder finite element model and field measurement data", Smart Struct. Syst., in this issue.
  21. Peeters, B. and De Roeck, G. (1999), "Reference-based stochastic subspace identification for output-only modal analysis", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 13(6), 855-878. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1999.1249
  22. Tikhonov, A.N. and Arsenin, V.Y. (1977), Solutions of ill-posed problems, Wiley, New York.
  23. Van Overschee, P. and De Moor, B. (1996), Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory, Implementation and Applications, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
  24. Wu, J.R. and Li, Q.S. (2004), "Finite element model updating for a high-rise structure based on ambient vibration measurements", Eng. Struct., 26(7), 979-990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.002
  25. Yang, Y.B. and Chen, Y.J. (2009), "A new direct method for updating structural models based on measured modal data", Eng. Struct., 31(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.011
  26. Zhang, Q.W., Chang, C.C. and Chang, T.Y.P. (2000), "Finite element model updating for structures with parametric constraints", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 29(7), 927-944. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200007)29:7<927::AID-EQE955>3.0.CO;2-4

피인용 문헌

  1. Stochastic modelling and optimum inspection and maintenance strategy for fatigue affected steel bridge members vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.18.3.569
  2. Optimal reduction from an initial sensor deployment along the deck of a cable-stayed bridge vol.17, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.3.523
  3. Investigation of mode identifiability of a cable-stayed bridge: comparison from ambient vibration responses and from typhoon-induced dynamic responses vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2015.15.2.447
  4. Operational modal analysis of Canton Tower by a fast frequency domain Bayesian method vol.17, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2016.17.2.209
  5. Structural health monitoring of Shanghai Tower during different stages using a Bayesian approach vol.23, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1840
  6. Structural finite element model updating using incomplete ambient vibration modal data vol.57, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5619-9
  7. Mode identifiability of a cable-stayed bridge using modal contribution index vol.20, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2017.20.2.115
  8. Stochastic modelling fatigue crack evolution and optimum maintenance strategy for composite blades of wind turbines vol.63, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.6.703