DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multiobjective size and topolgy optimization of dome structures

  • Received : 2011.11.15
  • Accepted : 2012.08.09
  • Published : 2012.09.25

Abstract

The size and topology of geometrically nonlinear dome structures are optimized thereby minimizing both its entire weight & joint (node) displacements and maximizing load-carrying capacity. Design constraints are implemented from provisions of American Petroleum Institute specification (API RP2A-LRFD). In accordance with the proposed design constraints, the member responses computed by use of arc-length technique as a nonlinear structural analysis method are checked at each load increment. Thus, a penalization process utilized for inclusion of unfeasible designations to genetic search is correspondingly neglected. In order to solve this complex design optimization problem with multiple objective functions, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA II) approach is employed as a multi-objective optimization tool. Furthermore, the flexibility of proposed optimization is enhanced thereby integrating an automatic dome generating tool. Thus, it is possible to generate three distinct sphere-shaped dome configurations with varying topologies. It is demonstrated that the inclusion of brace (diagonal) members into the geometrical configuration of dome structure provides a weight-saving dome designation with higher load-carrying capacity. The proposed optimization approach is recommended for the design optimization of geometrically nonlinear dome structures.

Keywords

References

  1. Carbas, S. and Saka, M.P. (2011), "Optimum topology design of various geometrically nonlinear latticed domes using improved harmony search method", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 1, 1-23.
  2. Cardoso, J.B. and Arora, J.S. (1988), "Variational method for design sensitivity analysis in nonlinear structural mehanics", AIAA J., 26, 5-22. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48757
  3. Choi, K.K. and Santos, J.L.T. (1987), "Design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear structural systems, Part I: theory" Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 24, 2039-2055. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620241103
  4. Deb, K. and Goel, T. (2001a), "Controlled elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms for better convergence", Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993, 67-81.
  5. Deb, K. (2001b), Multi-Objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A. and Meyarivan, T. (2002), "A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm:NSGA-II", IEEE T. Evol. Comput., 6(2), 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
  7. Fonseca, C.M. and Fleming, F.J. (1993), "Genetic algorithms for multiobjective optimization: formulation, discussion and generalization", Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 416- 423.
  8. Forde, B.W.R. and Stiemer, S.F. (1987), "Improved arc-length orthogonality methods for nonlinear finite element analysis", Comput. Struct., 27, 625-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(87)90078-2
  9. Hasancebi, O., Carbas, S., Dogan, E., Erdal, F. and Saka, M.P. (2009), "Performance evaluation of metaheuristic search techniques in the optimum design of real size pin jointed structures", Comput. Struct., 87, 284-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.01.002
  10. Horn, J.N., Nafpliotis, A.L. and Goldberg, D.E. (1994), "A niched pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization", Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation,IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, 82-87.
  11. Hrinda, G.A. and Nguyen, D.T. (2008), "Optimization of stability-constrained geometrically nonlinear shallow trusses using an arc length sparse method with a strain energy density approach", Finite Elem. Analy. Des., 44, 933-950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2008.07.004
  12. http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/-manuel/hypervolume.
  13. Kamat, M.P., Khot, N.S. and Venkayya, V.B. (1984), "Optimization of shallow trusses against limit point instability", AIAA J., 22, 403-408. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.48461
  14. Kannan, S., Baskar, S., MacCalley, J.D. and Murugan, P. (2009), "Application of NSGAII algorithm to generation expansion palnning", IEEE T. Power Syst., 24(1), 454-461. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2008.2004737
  15. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2010), "Optimal design of schwedler and ribbed domes via hybrid big bang-big crunch algorithm", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(3), 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.10.013
  16. Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S. (2011), "Geometry and topology optimization of geodesic domes using charged system search", Struct. Multidiscip. O., 43(2), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0566-y
  17. Khot, N.S. and Kamat, M.P. (1985), "Minimum weight design of truss structures with geometric nonlinear behavior", AIAA J., 23, 139-144. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.8882
  18. Levy, R. and Perng, H.S. (1988), "Optimization for nonlinear stability", Comput. Struct., 30, 529-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90286-6
  19. Levy, R. (1994a), "Optimization for buckling with exact geometries", Comput. Struct., 53, 1139-1144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90161-9
  20. Levy, R. (1994b), "Optimal design of trusses for overall stability", Comput. Struct., 53(5), 1133-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(94)90160-0
  21. Ohsaki, M. (2001), "Sensitivity analysis and optimization corresponding to a degenerate critical point", Int. J. Solid Struct., 38, 4955-4967. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00320-6
  22. Ohsaki, M. (2005), "Design sensitivity analysis and optimization for nonlinear buckling of finite-dimensional elastic conservative structures", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 194, 3331-3358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.021
  23. Ohsaki, H.M. and Ikeda, K. (2006), "Imperfection sensitivity analysis of hill-top branching with many symmetric bifurcation points", Int. J. Solid Struct., 43(16), 4704-4719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.06.036
  24. Saka, M.P. and Kameshki, E.S. (1998), "Optimum design of nonlinear elastic framed domes", Adv. Eng. Software, 29(7-9), 519-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00018-0
  25. Saka, M.P. (2007a), "Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm", Adv. Struct. Eng., 10, 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1260/136943307783571445
  26. Saka, M.P. (2007b), "Optimum topological design of geometrically nonlinear single layer latticed domes using coupled genetic algorithm", Comput. Struct., 85, 1635-1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.023
  27. Santos, J.L.T. and Choi, K.K. (1988), "Sizing design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear structural systems, Part II", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 26, 2039-2055.
  28. Schaffer, J.D. (1984), "Multiple objective optimization with vector evaluated genetic algorithms", Ph.D. Thesis, Vanderbilt University.
  29. Sedaghati, R. and Tabarrok, B. (2000), "Optimum design of truss structures undergoing large deflections subject to a system stability constraint", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 48(3), 421-434. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(20000530)48:3<421::AID-NME885>3.0.CO;2-X
  30. Sepehri, A., Daneshmand, F. and Jafarpur, K. (2012), "A modified particle swarm approach for Multiobjective optimization of laminated composite structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 42(3), 335-352. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2012.42.3.335
  31. Srinivas, N. and Deb, K. (1995), "Multiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms", Evol. Comput., 2(3), 221-248.
  32. Sunar, M. and Kahraman, R. (2001), "A comparative study of multiobjective optimization methods in structural design", Turkish J. Eng. Environ. Sci., 25(2), 69-78.
  33. Talaslioglu, T. (2011), "Multiobjective design optimization of grillage systems according to LRFD-AISC", Adv. Civil Eng., Hindawi Press.
  34. Tanaka, M. and Tanino, T. (1992), "Global optimization by the genetic algorithm in a multiobjective decision support system", Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on MultipleCriteria Decision Making, 261-270.
  35. Zhou, A., Qu, B.Y., Li, H., Zhao, S.Z. and Suganthan, P.N. (2011), Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Survey of the State of Art, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 1, 32-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2011.03.001

Cited by

  1. Probabilistic multi-objective optimization of a corrugated-core sandwich structure vol.10, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2016.10.6.709
  2. Bi-objective optimisation of single-layer steel grid structures of folded-plate curtain walls vol.19, pp.sup8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891715Z.0000000001695
  3. Topology optimization of nonlinear single layer domes by a new metaheuristic vol.16, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.6.681
  4. Guided genetic algorithm for dome optimization against instability with discrete variables vol.139, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.09.019
  5. Optimization of domes against instability vol.28, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.4.427
  6. Optimization of the braced dome structures by using Jaya algorithm with frequency constraints vol.30, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.30.1.047
  7. Optimal dome design considering member-related design constraints vol.13, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0543-5