Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제42권4호
  • /
  • Pages.531-549
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of corrosion on the ultimate strength of double hull oil tankers - Part II: hull girders

  • Kim, Do Kyun (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Dae Kyeom (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Dong Hee (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Han Byul (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Bong Ju (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Seo, Jung Kwan (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University) ;
  • Paik, Jeom Kee (The Ship and Offshore Research Institute (The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust Research Centre of Excellence), Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.09.21
  • 심사 : 2012.04.11
  • 발행 : 2012.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Numerous oil tanker losses have been reported and one of the possible causes of such casualties is caused by the structural failure of aging ship hulls in rough weather. In aging ships, corrosion and fatigue cracks are the two most important factors affecting structural safety and integrity. This research is about effect on hull girder ultimate strength behavior of double hull oil tanker according to corrosion after Part I: stiffened panel. Based on corrosion data of Part I (time-dependent corrosion wastage model and CSR corrosion model), when progressing corrosion of fourtypes of double hull oil tankers (VLCC, Suezmax, Aframax, and Panamax), the ultimate strength behavior of hull girder is compared and analyzed. In case of the ultimate strength behavior of hull girder, when occurring corrosion, the result under vertical and horizontal bending moment is analyzed. The effect of time-dependent corrosion wastage on the ultimate hull girder strength as well as the area, section modulus, and moment of inertia are also studied. The result of this research will be useful data to evaluate ultimate hull girder strength of corroded double hull oil tanker.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ALPS/HULL (2011), "A computer program for progressive collapse analysis of ship hulls", Advanced Technology Center, DRS C3 Systems, Inc., MD, USA (www.proteusengineering.com, www.maestromarine. com).
  2. ANSYS (2010), Version 12.0, ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA.
  3. Caldwell, J.B. (1965), "Ultimate longitudinal strength", Trans. RINA, 107, 411-430.
  4. DNV (2010), Fatigue Assessment of Ship Structures, Classification Notes, No. 30.7.
  5. Dow, R.S. (1991), "Testing and analysis of 1/3-scale welded steel frigate model", Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Marine Structures, Dunfermline, Scotland.
  6. Gudze, M.T. and Melchers, R.E. (2008), "Operational based corrosion analysis in naval ships", Corros. Sci., 50(12), 3296-3307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2008.08.048
  7. Guo, J., Wang, G., Ivanov, L. and Perakis, A.N. (2008), "Time-varying ultimate strength of aging tanker deck plate considering corrosion effect", Marine Struct., 21(4), 402-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2008.03.002
  8. Hughes, O.F. and Paik, J.K. (2010), Ship Structural Analysis and Design, The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, New Jersey, USA.
  9. IACS (2006a), "Common structural rules for double hull oil tankers", International Association of Classification Societies, London, UK.
  10. IACS (2006b), "Common structural rules for bulk carriers", International Association of Classification Societies, London, UK.
  11. IMO (2003), Revised interim guidelines for the approval of alternative methods of design and construction of oil tankers adopted by the Marine Environment Protection Committee of the Organization by Resolution MEPC 110(49), International Maritime Organization, London, UK.
  12. ISO (2007), "International standard ISO 18072-1, Ships and marine technology - Ship structures, Part 1: General requirements for their limit state assessment", International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
  13. Kang, S.W., Kim, M.H., Kim, J.H., Kim, K.S., Kang, J.K. and Heo, J.H. (2010), "An experimental study on the fatigue strength assessment of longi-webconnections in ship structures using structural stress", Ocean Eng., 36, 1067-1072.
  14. Lotsberg, I. (2006), "Assessment of fatigue capacity in the new bulkcarrier and tanker rules", Marine Struct., 19, 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2006.03.001
  15. Melchers, R.E. and Jiang, X. (2006), "Estimation of models for durability of epoxy coatings in water ballast tanks", Ships Offshore Struct., 1(1), 61-69. https://doi.org/10.1533/saos.2004.0006
  16. Paik, J.K., Kim, B.J. and Seo, J.K. (2008), "Methods for ultimate limit state assessment of ships and shipshipped offshore structures: Part I (unstiffened panels), Part II (stiffened panels) and Part III (hull girders)", Ocean Engineering, 35(2), 261-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.08.004
  17. Paik, J.K., Kim, D.K. and Kim, M.S. (2009), "Ultimate strength performance of Suezmax tanker structures: Pre- CSR versus CSR designs", Int. J. Marit. Eng., 151(A2).
  18. Paik, J.K., Kim, D.K., Park, D.H., Kim, H.B., Mansour, A.E. and Caldwell, J.B. (2011), "Modified Paik- Mansour formula for ultimate strength calculations of ship hulls", Proceedings of MARSTRUCT 2011 Conference, Hamburg, Germany.
  19. Paik, J.K., Lee, J.M., Hwang, J.S. and Park, Y.I. (2003a), "A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for the structures of single/double hull tankers and FSOs/FPSOs", Marine Technol., 40(3), 201-217.
  20. Paik, J.K. and Mansour, A.E. (1995), "A simple formulation for predicting the ultimate strength of ships", J. Mar. Sci. Technol., 1(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01240013
  21. Paik, J.K. and Melchers, R.E. (2008), Condition Assessment of Aged Structures, CRC Press, New York, USA.
  22. Paik, J.K. and Thayamballi, A.K. (1998), "The strength and reliability of bulk carrier structures subject to age and accidental flooding", Trans. Soc. Naval Arch. Marine Eng., 106, 1-40.
  23. Paik, J.K. and Thayamballi, A.K. (2007), Ship-shaped Offshore Installations: Design, Building, and Operation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  24. Paik, J.K., Thayamballi, A.K., Park, Y.I. and Hwang, J.S. (2003b), "A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for bulk carrier structures", Int. J. Marit. Eng., 145(A2), 61-87.
  25. Paik, J.K., Thayamballi, A.K., Park, Y.I. and Hwang, J.S. (2004), "A time-dependent corrosion wastage model for seawater ballast tanks of ships", Corros. Sci., 46, 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(03)00145-8
  26. Poutiainen, I. and Marquis, G. (2006), "A fatigue assessment method based on weld stress", Int. J. Fatigue, 28, 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.11.007

피인용 문헌

  1. Time-Dependent Ultimate Strength Performance of Corroded FPSOs vol.39, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1364-4
  2. Operability of non-ice class aged ships in the Arctic Ocean—Part I: Ultimate limit state approach vol.102, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.12.040
  3. Condition assessment of raking damaged bulk carriers under vertical bending moments vol.46, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.46.5.629
  4. Ultimate strength performance of bulk carriers with various corrosion additions vol.10, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2014.883957
  5. Ultimate strength performance of tankers associated with industry corrosion addition practices vol.6, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0196
  6. Comparison of residual strength-grounding damage index diagrams for tankers produced by the ALPS/HULL ISFEM and design formula method vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0117
  7. Ultimate strength performance of Northern sea going non-ice class commercial ships vol.52, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.52.3.613
  8. Effect of uncertain factors on the hull girder ultimate vertical bending moment of bulk carriers vol.148, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.031
  9. Comparison of residual strength-grounding damage index diagrams for tankers produced by the ALPS/HULL ISFEM and design formula method vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2013.5.1.047
  10. Effect of corrosion on the ship hull of a double hull very large crude oil carrier vol.16, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-017-1425-7
  11. Simplified Technique for Predicting Offshore Pipeline Expansion vol.17, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-018-0006-8
  12. Ultimate strength of initially deflected plate under longitudinal compression: Part I = An advanced empirical formulation vol.68, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.68.2.247
  13. Ultimate bending capacity of aged fixed platform by considering the effect of marine fouling vol.16, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78255479
  14. An advanced technique to predict time-dependent corrosion damage of onshore, offshore, nearshore and ship structures: Part I = generalisation vol.12, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.06.007
  15. An advanced technique to predict time-dependent corrosion damage of onshore, offshore, nearshore and ship structures: Part II = Application to the ship's ballast tank vol.12, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.07.002
  16. A practical diagram to determine the residual longitudinal strength of grounded ship in Northern Sea Route vol.15, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1667113
  17. Conversion of an oil tanker into FPSO in Gulf of Mexico: strength and fatigue assessment vol.16, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2020.1790298