Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제41권6호
  • /
  • Pages.735-750
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison between two geometrical nonlinear methods for truss analyses

  • Greco, M. (Graduate Program in Structural Engineering, Department of Structural Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais) ;
  • Menin, R.C.G. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Technology, University of Brasilia) ;
  • Ferreira, I.P. (Graduate Program in Structural Engineering, Department of Structural Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais) ;
  • Barros, F.B. (Graduate Program in Structural Engineering, Department of Structural Engineering, School of Engineering, Federal University of Minas Gerais)
  • 투고 : 2011.02.16
  • 심사 : 2012.02.21
  • 발행 : 2012.03.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper presents a comparison between two different procedures to deal with the geometric nonlinear analysis of space trusses, considering its structural stability aspects. The first nonlinear formulation, called positional, uses nodal positions rather than nodal displacements to describe the finite elements kinematics. The strains are computed directly from the proposed position concept, using a Cartesian coordinate system fixed in space. The second formulation, called corotational, is based on the explicit separation between rigid body motion and deformed motion. The numerical examples demonstrate the performances and the convergence of the responses for both analyzed formulations. Two numerical examples were compared, including a lattice beam with postcritical behavior. Despite the two completely different approaches to deal with the geometrical nonlinear problem, the results present good agreement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bathe, K.J. (1996), Finite Element Procedures, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
  2. Batoz, J.L. and Dhatt, G. (1979), "Incremental displacement algorithms for non-linear problems", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 14, 1262-1266. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620140811
  3. Coda, H. and Greco, M. (2004), "A simple FEM formulation for large deflection 2D frame analysis based on position description", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 193, 3541-3557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.01.005
  4. Cook, R.D. (2001), Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
  5. Crisfield, M.A. (1981), "A fast incremental-iterative solution procedure that handles snap-through", Comput. Struct., 13, 55-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(81)90108-5
  6. Greco, M. and Venturini, W.S. (2006), "Stability analysis of three-dimensional trusses", Latin Am. J. Solids Struct., 3, 325-344.
  7. Greco, M. and Ferreira, I.P. (2009), "The logarithmic strain measure applied to the nonlinear positional formulation for space truss analysis", Finite Elem. Analy. D., 45, 632-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2009.05.005
  8. Hrinda, G.A. (2010), "Snap-through instability patterns in truss structures", Nasa Langley Research Center, Hamptom, Virginia, 23831.
  9. Noor, A.K. and Peters, J.M. (1980), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis of space trusses", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 21, 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(80)90027-4
  10. Saffari, H., Fadaee, M.J. and Tabatabaei, R. (2008), "Nonlinear analysis of space trusses using modified normal flow algorithm", J. Struct. Eng., 134, 998-1005. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(998)
  11. Saka, M.P. (2007), "Optimum topological design of geometrically nonlinear single layer latticed domes using coupled genetic algorithm", Int. J. Space Struct., 85, 1635-1646.
  12. Thai, H.T. and Kim, S.E. (2009), "Large deflection inelastic analysis of space trusses using generalized displacement control method", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65, 1987-1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.012
  13. Toklu, Y.C. (2004), "Nonlinear analysis of trusses through energy minimization", Comput. Struct., 82, 1581-1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.05.008
  14. Zhou, Z., Meng, S.P. and Wu, J. (2009), "Stability analysis of prestressed space truss structures based on the imperfect truss element", Int. J. Steel Struct., 9(3), 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03249499

피인용 문헌

  1. EFESTS: Educational finite element software for truss structure – Part 3: Geometrically nonlinear static analysis vol.45, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306419016689503
  2. Comprehensive evaluation of structural geometrical nonlinear solution techniques Part I: Formulation and characteristics of the methods vol.48, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.48.6.849
  3. Analysis of trusses by total potential optimization method coupled with harmony search vol.45, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.45.2.183
  4. Computation of Nonunique Solutions for Trusses Undergoing Large Deflections vol.12, pp.03, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1142/S021987621550022X
  5. Nonlinear dynamic and deployment analysis of clustered tensegrity structures using a positional formulation FEM vol.187, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.12.050
  6. Analysis of Tensegric Structures by Total Potential Optimization Using Metaheuristic Algorithms vol.29, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000571
  7. A Simple FEM Formulation Applied to Nonlinear Problems of Impact with Thermomechanical Coupling vol.14, pp.13, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78253737
  8. Dynamic Instability in Shallow Arches under Transversal Forces and Plane Frames with Semirigid Connections vol.2018, pp.1563-5147, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1985907
  9. Finding buckling points for nonlinear structures by dynamic relaxation scheme vol.14, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0549-z
  10. A Novel Hybrid Harmony Search Approach for the Analysis of Plane Stress Systems via Total Potential Optimization vol.10, pp.7, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072301
  11. Analysis of Plane-Stress Systems via Total Potential Optimization Method Considering Nonlinear Behavior vol.146, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002808
  12. Total Potential Optimization Using Metaheuristic Algorithms for Solving Nonlinear Plane Strain Systems vol.11, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073220