DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Crack identification based on Kriging surrogate model

  • Gao, Hai-Yang (State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology) ;
  • Guo, Xing-Lin (State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology) ;
  • Hu, Xiao-Fei (State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment, Dalian University of Technology)
  • Received : 2011.03.20
  • Accepted : 2011.11.07
  • Published : 2012.01.10

Abstract

Kriging surrogate model provides explicit functions to represent the relationships between the inputs and outputs of a linear or nonlinear system, which is a desirable advantage for response estimation and parameter identification in structural design and model updating problem. However, little research has been carried out in applying Kriging model to crack identification. In this work, a scheme for crack identification based on a Kriging surrogate model is proposed. A modified rectangular grid (MRG) is introduced to move some sample points lying on the boundary into the internal design region, which will provide more useful information for the construction of Kriging model. The initial Kriging model is then constructed by samples of varying crack parameters (locations and sizes) and their corresponding modal frequencies. For identifying crack parameters, a robust stochastic particle swarm optimization (SPSO) algorithm is used to find the global optimal solution beyond the constructed Kriging model. To improve the accuracy of surrogate model, the finite element (FE) analysis soft ANSYS is employed to deal with the re-meshing problem during surrogate model updating. Specially, a simple method for crack number identification is proposed by finding the maximum probability factor. Finally, numerical simulations and experimental research are performed to assess the effectiveness and noise immunity of this proposed scheme.

Keywords

References

  1. Atalla, M.J. and Inman, D.J. (1998), "On model updating using neural networks", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 12(1), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1997.0138
  2. Casciati, S. (2010), "Response surface models to detect and localize distributed cracks in a complex continuum", J. Eng. Mech. ASCE, 136(9), 1131-1142. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000148
  3. Casciati, S. (2010), "Statistical approach to a SHM benchmark problem", Smart Struct. Syst., 6(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2010.6.1.017
  4. Chaudhari, T.D. and Maiti, S.K. (2000), "A study of vibration of geometrically segmented beams with and without crack", Int. J. Solids Struct., 37(5), 761-779. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(99)00054-2
  5. Cundy, A.L. (2002), "Use of response surface metamodels in damage identification of dynamic structures", Master Thesis, Virgina Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, US.
  6. Dimarogonas, A.D. and Paipetis, S.A. (1983), Analytical Methods in rotor dynamics, Elsevier Applied Science, London.
  7. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R. and Prime, M.B. (1998), "A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods", Shock. Vib., 30(2), 91-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000201
  8. Fang, S.E. and Perera, R. (2011), "Damage identification by response surface based model updating using Doptimal design", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 25(2), 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.07.007
  9. Faravelli, L. and Casciati, S. (2004), "Structural damage detection and localization by response change diagnosis", Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater., 6(2), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/pse.171
  10. Forrester, A.I.J. and Keane, A.J. (2009), "Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization", Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 45(1-3), 50-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2008.11.001
  11. Gao, Y.H. (2008), "Optimization methods based on Kriging surrogate model and their application in injection molding", Ph. D. Thesis, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, PRC.
  12. GaoY.H., Turng, L.S. and Wang, X.C. (2008), "Adaptive geometry and process optimization for injection molding using the Kriging surrogate model trained by numerical simulation", Adv. Poly. Tech., 27(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/adv.20116
  13. Gao, Y.H. and Wang, X.C. (2008), "An effective warpage optimization method in injection molding based on the Kriging model", Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech., 37(9-10), 953-960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-1044-6
  14. Gudmundson, P. (1982), "Eigenfrequency changes of structures due to cracks, notches or other geometrical changes", J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 30(5), 339-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(82)90004-7
  15. Gudmundson, P. (1983), "The dynamic behaviour of slender structures with cross-sectional cracks", J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 31(4), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(83)90003-0
  16. Hu, J. and Liang, R.Y. (1993), "An integrated approach to detection of cracks using vibration characteristics", J. Frankin Institute, 330(5), 841-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(93)90080-E
  17. Huang, Z., Wang, C., Chen, J. and Tian, H. (2011), "Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on Kriging surrogate models", J. Comput. Struct., 89(1-2), 27-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.07.010
  18. Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M. and Welch, W.J. (1998), "Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions", J. Glob. Optim., 13(4), 455-492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147
  19. Kisa, M. and Brandon, J.A (2000), "Free vibration analysis of multiple open-edge cracked beams by component mode synthesis", Struct. Eng. Mech., 10(l), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2000.10.1.081
  20. Lam, H.F. and Ng, C.T. (2008), "A probabilistic method for the detection of obstructed cracks of beam-type structures using spatial wavelet transform", Probab. Eng. Mech., 23(2-3), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.12.023
  21. Lee, J. (2009a), "Identification of multiple cracks in a beam using vibration amplitudes", J. Sound Vib., 326(1-2), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2009.04.042
  22. Lee, J. (2009b), "Identification of multiple cracks using natural frequencies", J. Sound Vib., 320(3), 482-490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.10.033
  23. Lee, J.J., Lee, J.W., Yi, J.H., Yun, C.B. and Jung, H.Y. (2005), "Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models", J. Sound Vib., 280(3-5), 555-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2004.01.003
  24. Lele, S.P. and Maiti, S.K. (2002), "Modelling of transverse vibration of short beams for crack detection and measurement of crack extension", J. Sound Vib., 257(3), 559-583. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2002.5059
  25. Liang, R.Y., Choy, F.K. and Hu, J. (1991), "Detection of cracks in beam structures using measurements of natural frequencies", J. Frankin Institute, 328(4), 505-518. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-0032(91)90023-V
  26. Nandwana, B.P. and Maiti, S.K. (1997), "Detection of the location and size of a crack in stepped cantilever beams based on measurements of natural frequencies", J. Sound Vib., 203(3), 435-446. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1996.0856
  27. Ostachowicz, W.M. and Krawczuk, M. (1991), "Analysis of the effect of cracks on the natural frequencies of a cantilever beam", J. Sound Vib., 150(2), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(91)90615-Q
  28. Patil, D.P. and Maiti, S.K. (2003), "Detection of multiple cracks using frequency measurements", Eng. Fract. Mech., 70(12), 1553-1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00121-2
  29. Perera, R. and Ruiz, A. (2008), "A multistage FE updating procedure for damage identification in large-scale structures based on multiobjective evolutionary optimization", Mech. Syst. Signal Pr., 22(4), 970-991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.10.004
  30. Qi, H., Ruan, L.M., Zhang, H.C., Wang, Y.M. and Tan, H.P. (2007), "Inverse radiation analysis of a onedimensional participating slab by stochastic particle swarm optimizer algorithm", Int. J. Therm. Sci., 46(7), 649-661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2006.10.002
  31. Ren, W.X. and Chen, H.B. (2010), "Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method", Eng. Struct., 32(8), 2455-2465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.019
  32. Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P. (1989), "Design and analysis of computer experiments", Stat. Sci., 4(4), 409-435. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  33. Sakata, S., Ashida, F. and Zako, M. (2003), "Structural optimization using Kriging approximation", Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 192(7-8), 923-939. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00617-5
  34. Sakata, S., Ashida, F. and Zako, M. (2004), "An efficient algorithm for Kriging approximation and optimization with large-scale sampling data", Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 193(3-5), 385-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2003.10.006
  35. Sakata, S., Ashida, F. and Zako, M. (2007), "On applying Kriging-based approximate optimization to inaccurate data", Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng., 196(13-16), 2055-2069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.11.004
  36. Shifrin, E.I. and Ruotolo, R. (1999), "Natural frequencies of a beam with an arbitrary number of cracks", J. Sound Vib., 222(3), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1998.2083
  37. Shyy, W., Papila, N., Vaidyanathan, R. and Tucker, K. (2001), "Global design optimization for aerodynamics and rocket propulsion components", Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 37(1), 59-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00002-1
  38. Simpson, T.W., Poplinski, J.D., Koch, P.N. and Allen, J.K. (2001), "Meta-models for computer-based engineering design: survey and recommendations", Eng. Comput., 17(2), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007198
  39. Zheng, D.Y. and Fan, S.C. (2001a), "Natural frequencies of a non-uniform beam with multiple cracks via modied Fourier series", J. Sound Vib., 242(4), 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2000.3360
  40. Zheng, D.Y. and Fan, S.C. (2001b), "Natural frequency changes of a cracked Timoshenko beam by modied Fourier series", J. Sound Vib., 246(2), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.2001.3632
  41. Zitzler, E. and Thiele, L. (1999), "Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach", IEEE T. Evolut. Comput., 3(4), 257-271. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.797969

Cited by

  1. Data to decisions: Real-time structural assessment from sparse measurements affected by uncertainty vol.182, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.12.007
  2. The State-of-the-Art on Framework of Vibration-Based Structural Damage Identification for Decision Making vol.7, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app7050497
  3. Seismic Vulnerability Analysis of RC Bridges Based on Kriging Model 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2017.1323040
  4. Generalized evolutionary optimum design of fiber-reinforced tire belt structure vol.15, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.15.4.451
  5. Surrogate Modeling Approach to Support Real-Time Structural Assessment and Decision Making vol.53, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053464
  6. Calibration of initial cable forces in cable-stayed bridge based on Kriging approach vol.92, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2014.08.007
  7. Crack Parameters Identification Based on a Kriging Surrogate Model for Operating Rotors vol.2018, pp.1875-9203, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9274526
  8. Adaptive Kriging surrogate model for the optimization design of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid-contaminated groundwater remediation process vol.15, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2014.108
  9. Implementation of Kriging Surrogate Models for Delamination Detection in Composite Structures vol.27, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/096369351802700604
  10. An Improved Objective Function for Modal-Based Damage Identification Using Substructural Virtual Distortion Method vol.9, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050971
  11. An improved two-step method based on Kriging model for beam structures vol.38, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461348419833586
  12. Finite element model updating of long-span cable-stayed bridge by Kriging surrogate model vol.74, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.2.157
  13. Response‐based time‐invariant methods for damage localization on a concrete bridge vol.21, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000013
  14. A novel reliability analysis method based on Gaussian process classification for structures with discontinuous response vol.75, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.6.771
  15. Blind-Kriging based natural frequency modeling of industrial Robot vol.74, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.11.008