Steel and Composite Structures

  • 제13권5호
  • /
  • Pages.423-436
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1229-9367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6233(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Cyclic test of buckling restrained braces composed of square steel rods and steel tube

  • Park, Junhee (Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Junho (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Jinkoo (Department of Architectural Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2010.10.21
  • 심사 : 2012.08.06
  • 발행 : 2012.11.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this study total of six buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) were manufactured using a square steel rod as a load-resisting core member and a hollow steel tube as restrainer to prevent global buckling of the core. The gap between the core and the tube was filled with steel rods as filler material. The performances of the proposed BRB from uniaxial and subassemblage tests were compared with those of the specimens filled with mortar. The test results showed that the performance of the BRB with discontinuous steel rods as filler material was not satisfactory, whereas the BRBs with continuous steel rods as filler material showed good performance when the external tubes were strong enough against buckling. It was observed that the buckling strength of the external tube of the BRBs filled with steel rods needs to be at least twice as high as that of the BRBs filled with mortar to ensure high cumulative plastic deformation of the BRB.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs

참고문헌

  1. AISC. (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, American Inst. of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago.
  2. AISC-SEAOC. (2001), Recommended Provisions for Buckling-Restrained Braced Frames, American Inst. of Steel Construction, Inc., Chicago.
  3. Black, C., Makris, N. and Aiken, I. (2001), Component testing, stability analysis and characterization of buckling restrained braces, Final report to Nippon Steel Corporation.
  4. Carden, L. P., Itani, A.M. and Buckle, I. G. (2006), "Seismic performance of steel girder bridges with ductile cross frames using buckling-restrained braces", J. Struct. Eng., 132(3), 338-345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:3(338)
  5. Deulkar, W. N., Modhera, C. D. and Patil, H. S. (2010). Buckling restrained braces for vibration control of building structure, International Journal of Research and Reviews in Applied Sciences, 4(4), 363-372.
  6. D'Aniello, M., Della Corte, G. and Mazzolani, F. M. (2008), Only-steel buckling restrained braces. 5th European Conference on Steel and Composite Structures, Graz, Austria.
  7. Ding, Y., Zang, Y. and Zhao, J. (2009), Tests of hysteretic behavior for unbonded steel plate brace encased in reinforced concrete panel, J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(5), 1160-1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.11.003
  8. Farhat, F., Nakamura, S. and Takahashi, K. (2009), Application of genetic algorithm to optimization of buckling restrained braces for seismic upgrading of existing structures, Comput. Struct., 87(1-2), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.08.002
  9. Huang, Y. H., Wada, A., Sugihara, H., Narikawa, M., Takeuchi, T. and Iwata, M. (2000), "Seismic performance of moment resistant steel frame with hysteretic damper", The Third International Conference STESSA, Montreal, Canada.
  10. Iwata, M. (2004), Applications-Design of Buckling Restrained Braces in Japan, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
  11. Iwata, M. and Murai, M. (2006), Buckling-restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper, Earthq. Engng. Struct. Dyn., 35(14), 1807-1826. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.608
  12. Kim, J., Choi, H. and Chung, L. (2004), "Energy-based seismic design of structures with buckling-restrained braces", Steel. Compos. Struct., 4(6), 437-452. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2004.4.6.437
  13. Kim, J., Park, J. and Kim, S. (2009), "Seismic behavior factors of buckling-restrained braced frames," Struct. Eng. Mech., 33(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.3.261
  14. Merritt, S., Uang, C. M. and Benzoni, G. (2003), Subassemblage testing of corebrace buckling-restrained braces, Final report to CoreBrace, LLC, Department of Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego.
  15. Pekcan, G., Linke, C. and Itani, A. (2009), Damage avoidance design of special truss moment frames with energy dissipating devices, J. Constr. Steel Res., 65, 1374-1384 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.08.012
  16. Shin, J., Lee, K., Jeong, S., Lee, H. and Kim, J. (2012), Experimental and analytical studies on bucklingrestrained knee braceing systems with channel sections, Int. J. Steel Struct., 12(1), 93-106 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-1009-Y
  17. Tremblay, R., Degrange, D. and Blouin, J. (1999), Seismic rehabilitation of a four-story building with a stiffened bracing system, Proceeding of the 8th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver.
  18. Tsai, K. C., Lai, J. W., Hwang, Y. C., Lin, S. L. and Weng, C. H. (2004), "Research and application on doublecore buckling restrained braces in Taiwan", Proceeding of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2179, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
  19. Usami, T., Lu, Z. and Ge, H. (2005), A seismic upgrading method for steel arch bridges using buckling-restrained braces, Earthq. Engng. Struct. Dyn., 34(4-5), 471-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.442
  20. Wada, A., Connor, J. J., Kawai, H., Iwata, M. and Watanabe, A. (1992), Damage Tolerant Structure, Proceedings of Fifth U.S.-Japan Workshop on Improvement of Building Structural Design: ATC-15-4 Report, San Diego, California, 27-39.
  21. Watanabe, A., Hitomoi, Y., Saeki, E., Wada, A. and Fujimoto, M. (1988), "Properties of braced encased in buckling-restrained concrete and steel tube", Proceedings of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, Vol. IV, 719-724.

피인용 문헌

  1. Structural behavior of conventional and buckling restrained braced frames subjected to near-field ground motions vol.7, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.4.553
  2. Seismic retrofit schemes for staggered truss structures vol.102, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.08.006
  3. Probabilistic seismic evaluation of buckling restrained braced frames using DCFD and PSDA methods vol.10, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.1.105
  4. Development of a novel self-centering buckling-restrained brace with BFRP composite tendons vol.16, pp.5, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.16.5.491
  5. Development of welded overlap core steel encased buckling-restrained braces vol.127, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.07.034
  6. Numerical and experimental studies of corrugated-web-connected buckling-restrained braces vol.134, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.12.014
  7. Development of box-shaped steel slit dampers for seismic retrofit of building structures vol.150, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.082
  8. A new perforated core buckling restrained brace vol.85, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.020
  9. 11.48: An experimental study on welded overlap core: Steel encased buckling-restrained braces vol.1, pp.2-3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/cepa.375
  10. Fatigue tests of damaged tubes under flexural loading vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2015.19.1.223
  11. Seismic loss assessment of a structure retrofitted with slit-friction hybrid dampers vol.130, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.052
  12. Experimental study on a new type of bucklingrestrained braces wrapped by GFRP vol.397, pp.1757-899X, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/397/1/012039
  13. Local and global buckling condition of all-steel buckling restrained braces vol.23, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.2.217
  14. Structural coupling mechanism of high strength steel and mild steel under multiaxial cyclic loading vol.27, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.2.229
  15. Buckling-restrained brace with CFRP encasing: Mechanical behavior & cyclic response vol.27, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.6.675
  16. The Effect of slit-friction hybrid damper on the Performance of Dual System vol.13, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149501913010271
  17. Prequalification of a set of buckling restrained braces: Part II - numerical simulations vol.34, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.4.561
  18. Design of buckling restrained braces with composite technique vol.35, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.5.687
  19. Performance of innovative composite buckling-restrained fuse for concentrically braced frames under cyclic loading vol.36, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.36.2.163
  20. Seismic retrofit of a structure using self-centring precast concrete frames with enlarged beam ends vol.72, pp.22, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.19.00012
  21. Steel hysteretic column dampers for seismic retrofit of soft-first-story structures vol.37, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.37.3.259
  22. Behaviour of buckling-restrained brace equipped with steel and polyamide casing vol.174, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.19.00206
  23. Experimental study on steel hysteretic column dampers for seismic retrofit of structures vol.40, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.40.4.495