Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic analysis of CFST frames considering the effect of the floor slab

  • Huang, Yuan (College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ.) ;
  • Yi, Weijian (College of Civil Engineering, Hunan Univ.) ;
  • Nie, Jianguo (Key Laboratory of Structural Engineering and Vibration of China Education Ministry, Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University)
  • Received : 2011.10.25
  • Accepted : 2012.08.06
  • Published : 2012.10.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper describes the refined 3-D finite element (FE) modeling of composite frames composed of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns and steel-concrete composite beams based on the test to get a better understanding of the seismic behavior of the steel-concrete composite frames. A number of material nonlinearities and contact nonlinearities, as well as geometry nonlinearities, were taken into account. The elastoplastic behavior, as well as fracture and post-fracture behavior, of the FE models were in good agreement with those of the specimens. Besides, the beam and panel zone deformation of the analysis models fitted well with the corresponding deformation of the specimens. Parametric studies were conducted based on the refined finite elememt (FE) model. The analyzed parameters include slab width, slab thickness, shear connection degree and axial force ratio. The influences of these parameters, together with the presence of transverse beam, on the seismic behavior of the composite frame were studied. And some advices for the corresponding seismic design provisions of composite structures were proposed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : National Science Foundation of China

References

  1. AISC. (2005a). "Specification for structural steel buildings", American Institute of Steel Construction, ANSI/AISC 360-05, Chicago
  2. AISC. (2005b). "Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings", American Institute of Steel Construction, ANSI /AISC 341-05, Chicago
  3. Ayoub, A. and Filippou, F.C. (2000). "Mixed Formulation of Nonlinear Steel-Concrete Composite Beam Element", J. Struct. Eng., 126(3), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:3(371)
  4. Bursi, O.S., Sun, F.F. and Postal, S. (2005). "Non-linear analysis of steel-concrete composite frames with full and partial shear connection subjected to seismic loads", J. Constr. Steel Res., b 61(1), 67-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.06.002
  5. Chen, Y.Y., Shen, Z.Y. and Han, L. (2004). "Measurement of Slipping-resistant Coefficients of Two Coating Surfaces in High Strength Bolts Connections: Part 1: Research on End-plate Connections with High Strength Bolts for Thin-walled Steel Members", Building Structure, 34(5), 3-6.
  6. du Plessis, D.P. and Daniels, J.H. (1973). "Strength of Composite Beam-to-Column Connections", Bethlehem. Fritz Engineering Lab.
  7. Eurocode 4. (2004). "Design of composite steel and concrete structures: Part 1.1 General rules for buildings", prEN 1994-1-1:2004. European Committee for Standardization.
  8. Eurocode 8. (2003). "Design of structures for earthquake resistance", prEN 1998-1-1:2003, European Committee for Standardization.
  9. FEMA 350. (2000). "Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment frame buildings", Federal Emergency Management Agency, Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for FEMA, Washington, D.C
  10. Fukumoto, T. and Morita, K. (2005). "Elastoplastic Behavior of Panel Zone in Steel Beam-to-Concrete Filled Steel Tube Column Moment Connections", J. Struct. Eng., 131(12), 1841-1853. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1841)
  11. GB50017. (2003). "Code for design of steel structures", Ministry of Construction of People's Republic of China, Beijing.
  12. Sargin, M. (1971). "Stress-strain relationships for concrete and the analysis of structural concrete sections", Solid Mechanics Division, University of Waterloo.
  13. Hajjar, J.F., Schiller, P.H. and Molodan, A. (1998). "A distributed plasticity model for concrete-filled steel tube beam-columns with interlayer slip", Eng. Struct., 20(8), 663-676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00107-7
  14. Li, W. and Han, L. (2010). "Seismic performance of CFST column to steel beam joints with RC slab: Analysis", J. Constr. Steel Res., 67(1), 127-139.
  15. Nie, J., et al. (2011). "Seismic behavior of CFRSTC composite frames considering slab effects", J. Constr. Steel Res., 68(1), 165-175.
  16. Kim, K.-D. and Engelhardt, M.D. (2005). "Composite Beam Element for Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of Steel Frames", J. Struct. Eng., 131(5), 715-724. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:5(715)
  17. Lee, C.H., Jeon, S.W., Kim, J.H. and Uong, C.M. (2005). "Effects of panel zone strength and beam web connection method on seismic performance of reduced beam section steel moment connections", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 131(12), 1854-1865. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:12(1854)
  18. Lee, S.J. (1987). "Seismic behavior of steel building structures with composite slabs", PhD thesis, Lehigh University.
  19. MSC. Marc. (2005). "User's guide, version 2005", Santa Ana.
  20. Nie, J., Qin, K. and Cai, C.S. (2008). "Seismic behavior of connections composed of CFSSTCs and steelconcrete composite beams-experimental study", J. Constr. Steel Res., 64(10), 1178-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.004
  21. Ollgaard, J.G., Slutter, R.G. and Fisher, J.W. (1971). "Shear strength of stud connections in light weight and normal weight concrete", J. AISC Engrg., 8(4), 55-64.
  22. Salari, M.R. and Spacone, E. (2001). "Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Frames with Bond-Slip", J. Struct. Eng., 127(11), 1243-1250. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:11(1243)
  23. Salari, M.R., Spacone, E., Shing, P.B. and Frangopol, D.M. (1998). "Nonlinear Analysis of Composite Beams with Deformable Shear Connectors", J. Struct. Eng., 124(10), 1148-1158. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:10(1148)
  24. Sebastian, W.M. and McConnel, R.E. (2000). "Nonlinear FE Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structures", J. Struct. Eng., 126(6), 662-674. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:6(662)
  25. Wang, W. and Teng, S. (2008). "Finite-Element Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Flat Plate Structures by Layered Shell Element", J. Struct. Eng., 134(12), 1862-1872. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:12(1862)
  26. Zhao, H., Kunnath, S.K. and Yuan, Y. (2010). "Simplified nonlinear response simulation of composite steelconcrete beams and CFST columns", Eng. Struct., 32(9), 2825-2831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.04.050
  27. Zhou, F., Mosalam, K.M. and Nakashima, M. (2007). "Finite-Element Analysis of a Composite Frame under Large Lateral Cyclic Loading", J. Struct. Eng., 133(7), 1018-1026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:7(1018)

Cited by

  1. Element-based stiffness reduction coefficient of steel–concrete composite beams with interface slip vol.49, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0841-5
  2. Influence of steel-concrete interaction in dissipative zones of frames: II - Numerical study vol.15, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2013.15.3.323
  3. Seismic performance of precast concrete frames with debonded reinforcement vol.51, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1174-3
  4. Experimental study on steel-concrete composite beams with Uplift-restricted and slip-permitted screw-type (URSP-S) connectors vol.35, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.35.2.261