DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Wealth of Seller and Buyer in Asset Sales

자산매각의 가치창출 효과: 매각기업과 매수기업의 비교분석

  • Lee, Sang-Lae (Department of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Oh, Hyun-Tak (Department of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2012.03.14
  • Accepted : 2012.04.12
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether asset sales contributed to increase of the shareholder value of the seller and the buyer in Japan. The period of analysis is 2000-2007. As a result of event study, Although the stockholder of the seller earn positive abnormal returns at the announcement of a asset sales, most stockholders of the buyer were break even. However, the buyer which purchase related asset get positive abnormal returns. Furthermore, when using a matched seller-buyer, we find that asset sales are firm value enhancing for the seller and buyer. Furthermore, we verify whether the excess return depends on the financial condition, and the managerial performance. we find that seller gains are related to the seller's managerial performance, leverage ratio, and buyer gains are related to the leverage ratio, foreigner holdings ratio. we conclude that lender and outside monitoring lead to increase of firm value.

본 연구는 2000년부터 2007년 말까지 일본의 상장제조기업 중에서 자산을 매각한 기업과 그것을 구입한 기업을 대상으로 자산매각의 경제적 성과를 측정하고 이에 영향을 미치는 요인을 분석하였다. 사건연구 방법에 의한 분석결과, 자산매각 공시전후의 단기간에는 매각기업의 경우 양(+)의 초과 수익률을 얻었지만, 매수기업의 주주의 손익에는 변화가 없었다. 하지만, 같은 자산을 매각한 기업과 매수한 기업만을 분석한 결과 매각기업과 매수기업의 초과수익률은 유의한 양(+)이며 합동 초과수익률 또한 유의한 양(+)으로 나타났으므로 자산매각은 기업가치를 증가시키는 거래라고 결론지을 수 있다. 기업성과와 재무적 특성과의 횡단면회귀분석의 결과를 보면, 매각기업의 공시효과와 ROA, 부채는 유의적인 양(+)의 관계를 갖고 있고, 매수기업의 공시효과는 부채, 외국인 주주비율과 유의적인 양(+)을 보였지만 기업규모와는 유의적인 양(-)의 관계를 나타냈다. 그 외의 토빈의 q와 임원주주비율, 은행주주비율은 중요한 요인이 되지 못하고 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander, G.P. Benson, G. and Kampmeyer, J., "Investigating the valuation effects of announcements of voluntary corporate sell offs," Journal of Finance, 39, pp.503-517, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb02323.x
  2. John, K. and Ofek, E., "Asset sales and increase in focus," Journal of Financial Economics, 37, pp.105-126, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00794-2
  3. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R., "Liquidation Values and Debt Capacity: A Market Equilibrium Approach," Journal of Finance, 47, pp.1343-1366, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04661.x
  4. Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., and Stafford, E., "New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, pp.103-120, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.2.103
  5. Inoue, K. and Kato, H., "M&A and Evaluation of a Stock Market : Compare with US and Japan," Securities analyst journal, 10, pp.33-43, 2004.
  6. Usui A., "the Wealth of shareholder and M&A," M&A investment of value management, Chuokeizaisha, 2001.
  7. Servaes, H., "Tobin's Q and the Gains from Takeovers," Journal of Finance, 36, pp.409-420, 1991.
  8. Kang, JK., Shivdasani, A., "Corporate restructuring during performance declines in Japan," Journal of Financial Economics. 46, pp.29-65, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00024-X
  9. Kang JK, Shivdasani, A., and Yamada, T., "The Effect of Bank Relations on Investment Decisions: An Investigation of Japanese Takeover Bids," Journal of Finance, 55, pp.2197-2218, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00284
  10. Yeh T, and Hoshino, Y., "Shareholders Wealth, Bank Control, and Large Shareholders: An Analysis of Japanese Mergers," Japan journal of finance, 21, pp.150-166, 2001
  11. Hite, G., Owers, J., and Rogers, R., "The Market for Interfirm Asset Sales: Partial. Sell-Offs and Total Liquidations," Journal of Financial Economics, 18, pp.229-252, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(87)90040-7
  12. Sicherman, N. and R. Pettway, "Acquisition of divested assets and shareholder wealth," Journal of Finance, 42, pp.1261-1273, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04365.x
  13. Datta. S., Iskandar-Datta. M., and Raman. K., "Value creation in corporate asset sales: The role of managerial performance and lender monitoring," Journal of Banking and Finance, 27, pp.351-375, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(01)00255-2
  14. Muramatsu, T. and Miyamoto, J "Corporate restructuring and M&A," pp. 152-172, Dobunkan Shuppan, 1999.
  15. Inoue, K., "The dealings form and the stock price effect of M&A in Japan," Japan journal of finance, 22(2), pp.107-120, 2002.
  16. Byun JH. and Ahn SL., "Acquirer's Firm Size and Stock Market Response to M&A Announcement," The korean journal of finance, 20(2), pp.37-68, 2007.
  17. Park JW. and Baek JS., "Restructuring Activites and Firm Value : Comparing Contraction and Expansion," Korean management review, 38(5), pp.1329-1352, 2009.
  18. Jensen, M.C., and Ruback, R.S., "The Market For Corporate Control," Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp.5-50, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90004-1
  19. Inoue, k. and Kato H., "Analysis about the stock price effect of an M&A announcement," Gendai finance, 13, pp.3-28, 2003.
  20. Roll, R., "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers," Journal of Business, 59, pp.97-216, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1086/296318
  21. Berger, P. G., and E, Ofek, E., "Diversification's Effect on Firm Value," Journal of Financial Economics, 37, pp.39-65, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6