Journal of Biosystems Engineering

Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery (한국농업기계학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance Comparison of Two Airfoil Rotor Designs for an Agricultural Unmanned Helicopter

  • Koo, Young-Mo (Dept. of Bio-industrial Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2012.02.13
  • Accepted : 2012.02.24
  • Published : 2012.02.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The most important element of an agricultural helicopter is the rotor blade realizing lift force. In order to improve the performance of the rotor blades, two types (KA152313 and KB203611) of airfoils were designed and compared. Methods: The nose shape of the KB203611 airfoil was 'drooped' and 'sharp' compared to the leading edge of the KA152313 airfoil. The performance of the experimental airfoils was simulated using CFD-ACE program, and lifts were measured in situ using the 'AgroHeli-4G', a prototype helicopter. Results: Simulated lifts of the blade with the KA152313 airfoil showed proper values for a wide range of angles of attack between $14^{\circ}{\sim}18^{\circ}$, while the simulated lift of the KB203611 blade exhibited maximum values near $13^{\circ}{\sim}14^{\circ}$. In the lift measurements, the range of operable angles of attack was a collective pitch angle at the grip (GP) of $12^{\circ}{\sim}18^{\circ}$ for the KA152313 blade. On the other hand, the range of angles of attack for the KB203611 blade was a GP of $12^{\circ}{\sim}14^{\circ}$. Conclusions: The blade of KA152313 performed well over a wide range of AoAs and the blade of KB203611 performed better at low AoAs. In this study, a variative airfoil blade, gradually emerging from grip to tip using the two different airfoils, was suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, S.J. 2005. Airfoil aerodynamic analysis for the helicopter rotor blade preliminary design. Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences 33(6):21-30 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2005.33.6.021
  2. Koo, Y. M. 2009. Development of essential mechanical elements for unmanned agricultural helicopter with payload of 20 kg. Final Report for IUPL of SMBA, MOCIE. Daegu, Korea (In Korean).
  3. Koo, Y. M., C. S. Lee, T. S. Soek, S. K. Shin, T. G. Kang, S. H. Kim and T. Y. Choi. 2006a. Aerial application using a small RF controlled helicopter (I) -status and cost analysis-. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 31(2):95-101 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2006.31.2.095
  4. Koo, Y. M., T. S. Soek, S. K. Shin, C. S. Lee and T. G. Kang. 2006b. Aerial application using a small RF controlled helicopter (III) -lift test and rotor system-. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 31(3):182-187 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2006.31.3.182
  5. Koo, Y. M., T. S. Seok and S. K. Shin. 2010. SW05 rotor lift of an unmanned helicopter for precise ULV aerial application. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 35(1):31-36 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2010.35.1.031
  6. Leishman, J.G. 2002. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. New York: Cambridge University.
  7. Park, Y. M., B. H. Chang, K. H. Chung and C. J. Hwang. 2004. Low Reynolds airfoil design for unmanned helicopter rotor blade. Proceedings of Fall Conference in the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Science, pp. 798-801 (In Korean).
  8. Prouty, R. W. 2002. Helicopter performance, stability, and control. Malabar, FL: Krieger Pub. Co. Inc.
  9. Sa, J. H., S. M. Lee, S. H. Park, C. J. Kim, Y. H. Yoo, K. H. Jung, and S. B. Kim. 2010. Effect of blade planform and airfoil configurations on hovering performance of rotor blades. Proceedings of Fall Conference in the Korean Society for Aeronautical and Space Science, pp. 976-979 (In Korean).
  10. Soek, T. S., Y. M. Koo, C. S. Lee, S. K. Shin, T. G. Kang and S.H. Kim. 2006a. Aerial application using a small RF controlled helicopter (II) -development of power unit-. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 31(2):102-107 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2006.31.2.102
  11. Seok, T. S., Y. M. Koo and C. H. Sohn. 2006b. Aerial application using a small RF controlled helicopter (IV CFD simulation of rotor lift-. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 31(4):343-348 (In Korean).
  12. Wilby, P.G. 2001. The development of rotor airfoil testing in the UK. Journal of the American Helicopter Society 46(3):210-220. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.46.210

Cited by

  1. Aerodynamic performance evaluation of basic airfoils for an agricultural unmanned helicopter using wind tunnel test and CFD simulation vol.31, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-017-1125-x