Prediction of Learning Flow, School Flow and School Support on Satisfaction and Learning Persistence in Engineering College

학습몰입, 학교몰입, 학교 지원의 만족도, 학습지속의향에 대한 예측력 검증

  • Joo, Young-Ju (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Chung, Ae-Kyung (Dept. of Digital Broadcasting and Media, Dong Seoul College) ;
  • Choi, Hye-Ri (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University)
  • 주영주 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 정애경 (동서울대학교 디지털방송미디어과) ;
  • 최혜리 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과)
  • Received : 2011.12.15
  • Accepted : 2012.03.15
  • Published : 2012.03.25

Abstract

The participants were 102 students with digital broadcasting and media major.. A hypothetical model proposed included learning flow, school support as predictors, and satisfaction and learning persistence as a criterion. The results of this study through multiple regression analysis indicated that learning flow and school flow predicted significantly on satisfaction. And school flow, school support, and satisfaction predicted significantly on learning persistence. In addition, satisfaction mediated between learning flow and learning persistence, and between school flow and learning persistence. A constructive foundation for providing learning strategies in the successful engineering education would be proposed on the basis of the current results of this study.

본 연구는 공학계열생들의 학습몰입, 학교몰입, 학교의 지원이 만족도와 학습지속의향 예측여부를 규명하는 것을 목적으로 하였다. 이를 위해 만족도와 학습지속의향을 준거변수로 하는 가설적 모형을 설정하고, 국내 D 대학의 2010년 1학기 기초학습 능력강화 프로그램에 속한 공학계열생들을 대상으로 설문을 실시하였다. 수집된 자료는 중다회귀분석을 통해 예측변수의 준거 변수에 대한 예측력을 검증하였다. 연구 결과, 학습몰입(${\beta}$= .22)과 학교몰입(${\beta}$= .20)은 만족도를 유의하게 예측하였으며, 학교몰입(${\beta}$= .32), 학교의 지원(${\beta}$= .23)과 만족도(${\beta}$= .22)는 학습지속의향을 유의하게 예측하였다. 마지막으로 만족도는 학습몰입과 학습지속의향, 학교몰입과 학습지속의향을 매개하는 변수임을 확인하였다. 위와 같은 연구결과는 학습몰입, 학교몰입, 학교의 지원 변수가 학습자들의 만족도, 학습지속의향 향상에 중요한 역할을 하는 변수임을 시사하며, 특히 만족도는 학습지속의향을 높이는데 매개역할을 하고 있음을 의미한다. 이에 본 연구는 공학계열생들의 성공적인 교육을 위한 학습전략을 제공하는데 있어서 기초적인 토대를 제공하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부, "주요교육통계" 2008년
  2. 교육과학기술부, "주요교육통계" 2009년
  3. 이정우, '이공계 기피현상 어떻게 해소할 것인가,' 물과 미래, 40권, 1호, 80-85쪽, 2007년
  4. N. Shin, "Online learner's 'flow' experience: An empirical study," British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 705-720, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00641.x
  5. 교육과학기술부, "주요교육통계" 2010년
  6. 주영주, 정애경, 이상회, 김선희, "전자매체를 활용한 사이버수업에서 자기조절학습능력, 사회적 실재감, 학습몰입, 만족도 간의 구조적 관계 규명," 전자공학회, 제48권 2호, 71-78쪽, 2011년
  7. 주영주, 정애경, 임연욱, 김가연, "전문대 학생의 강좌에 대한 자기효능감, 유용.용이성, 몰입 및 만족도간의 구조적 관게 규명," 교육의 이론과 실천, 제15권 3호, 217-238쪽, 2010년
  8. R. T. Mowday, L. W. Porter and R .Dubin, "Unit performance, situational factors, and employee attitudes in spatially separated work units," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 231-248, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(74)90048-8
  9. Y. H. W. Lin, and C. E. Rusbult, "Commitment to dating relationships and cross-sex friendships in America and China: The impact of centrality of relationship, normative support, and investment model variables," Journal of Social and Personal Rulationships, Vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 10-26. 1995.
  10. M. Lund, "The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships," Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, Vol. 2, pp. 3-23, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407585021001
  11. C. McLoughlin, Learner Support in Distance and Networked Learning Environments: Ten Dimensions for Successful Design. Distance Education, Vol, 23, no. 2, pp. 149-162, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791022000009178
  12. L. Rhoades, and R. Eisenberger, "Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 698-714, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
  13. A. Cabrera, A. Nora, and M. Castaneda, "College Persistence: Structural Equations Modeling Test of an Integrated Model of Student Retention," The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 123-139, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960026
  14. M. Vansteenkiste, S. , Joke, L. Willy, K. M., Sheldon and E. L. Deci, "Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 246-260, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
  15. K. A. Ellis, "Satisfaction of Graduate Students with their Distance Learning Experiences," Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, 2008
  16. R. D. Johnson, , S. Hornik, and E. Salas, "An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 356-369, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003
  17. J. M. Keller, Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of Instructional Development, Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 2-10, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02905780
  18. S. B. Merriam, "Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory," New Direction For Adult and Continuing Education, Vol. 89. pp. 3-13, 2001.
  19. M. Csikszentmihalyi, "Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention" N Y: Harper Perennial, 1997.
  20. M. L. Bote-Lorenzo, E. Gomez-Sanchez, G. Vega-Gorgojo, Y. Dimitriadis, J. I. Asensio-Perez and I. M. Jorrin-Abellan, Gridcole: A tailorable grid service based system that supports scripted collaborative learning. Computers & Education, Vol. 51, no. 1, pp.155-172, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.004
  21. B. Buchanan, "Building organizational commitment: the socialization of managers in work organizations," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 195, pp. 33-546, 1974.
  22. S. G. Clarke, and J. T. Haworth, "'Flow' experience in the daily lives of sixth-form college students," British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 85, no.4, pp. 511-523, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02538.x
  23. D. Rossin, Y. Ro, B. Klein, and Y. Guo, "The Effects of Flow on Learning Outcomes in an Online Information Management Course," Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87-98, 2009.
  24. Testa, M. R. Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Effort in the Service Environment. The Jounal of Psychology, Vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 226-236, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980109603693
  25. E. G. Lambert, N. L. Hogan, and M. L.Griffin. "The impact of distributive and procedural justice on correctional staff job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitmen,". Journal of Criminal Justice, Vol. 35, pp. 644-656, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2007.09.001
  26. L. J. Ducharme, and J. K. Martin, "Unrewarding Work, Coworker Support, and Job Satisfaction: A Test of the Buffering Hypothesis," Work and Occupations, Vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 223-243, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888400027002005
  27. B. Erdogan, and J. Enders, "Support from the top: Supervisors' perceived organizational support as a moderator of leader-member exchange to satisfaction and performance relationships," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, pp. 321-330, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.321
  28. J. Nakamura and M. Csikszentmihalyi, "The concept of flow. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.)," Handbook of positive psychology: pp. 89-105. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2002.
  29. 주영주, 김지연, 최혜리, "기업 사이버교육생의 자기조절학습능력, 학습몰입, 만족도, 학습지속의향 간의 구조적 관계 분석," 교육공학연구, 25권, 4호, 101-124, 2009년
  30. J. P. Meyer, and N. J. Allen, "A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment," Human Resources Management Review, Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 61-89, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  31. E. Rusbult, J. M. Martz, and C. R. Agnew. "The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size," Personal Relationships, Vol. 5, pp. 357-392, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
  32. M. Gloria, and T. A. Ho, "Environmental, social, and psychological experiences of asian american undergraduates: Examining issues of academic persistence," Journal of Counseling & Development, Vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 93-105, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2003.tb00230.x
  33. B. Holder, "An investigation of hope, academics, environment, and motivation as predictors of persistence in higher education online programs," Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 10, pp. 245-260, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.002
  34. C. T. Ennew, and M. R. Binks, "Impact of participative service relationships on quality, satisfaction and retention: an exploratory study," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 121-32, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00016-2
  35. Y. Levy, "Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses," Computers & Education, Vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 185-204, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.12.004
  36. J. C. Roca, C. M. Chiu, and F. J. Martinez, "Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, pp. 683-696, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.01.003
  37. N. Shin, "Transactional Presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning," Distance Education, Vol. 24, no, 1, 69-86, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910303048
  38. R. T. Mowday, L. W. Porter and R .Dubin, "Unit performance, situational factors, and employee attitudes in spatially separated work units," Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 231-248, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(74)90048-8
  39. J, C. Nunnally, and I. H. Bernstein, "Psychometric Theory," 3d ed. N Y: McGraw- Hill, 1994.
  40. 김나영, "사이버교육에서 학습동기, 프로그램, 조직의 지원과 상호작용, 몰입 및 학습성과의 구조적 관계 규명," 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사 논문, 2008년
  41. P. J. Curran, S. G. West, and J. F. Finch, "The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis," Psychological Methods, Vol. 1, pp. 19-29, 1996.
  42. R. J. Wlodkowski, "Motivation and Teaching: A Practical Guide," Washington: NEA Distribution Center, 1978.