산업공학 (IE interfaces)

  • 제25권1호
  • /
  • Pages.21-30
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1225-0996(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6465(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공급망 형성을 위한 협업기업 발굴방법의 최신 동향 분석

The State-of-the-art of Discovering New Suppliers to Build a Supply Chain

  • 김경덕 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 조보람 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 신문수 (한밭대학교 산업경영공학과) ;
  • 류광열 (부산대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 조현보 (포항공과대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Kim, Kyung-Doc (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Jo, Bo-Ram (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Shin, Moon-Soo (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Ryu, Kwang-Yeol (Department of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Bo (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2011.12.13
  • 심사 : 2012.02.06
  • 발행 : 2012.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In the past, buyers and suppliers met each other to find common interests off-line in exhibitions and conferences, or through personal connection. These activities were time consuming and costly. With the advent of information era, these activities moved to online market places, where buyers search for suppliers with a set of keywords that are believed to be representative of their requirements. Its fundamental assumption is that all the potential candidates are registered in a certain database. However, recently buyers want to diversify suppliers due to needs of cost competitiveness or frequent new product development. To this end, instead of choosing suppliers from the supplier pool, discovering suppliers from all over the world should be emphasized. In order to enable buyers to describe their requirements and suppliers to capture their manufacturing capabilities via online market places, the semantic differences of terms between buyers and suppliers should be resolved. The paper summarizes various supplier discovery frameworks and prototype systems, which can be employed to expose domestic small-medium enterprises into global buyers in the near future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akarte, M. M., Surendra, N. V., Ravi, B., and Rangaraj, N. (2001), Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 52(5), 511-522. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601124
  2. Alibaba.com Limited (2008), Annual Report 2008.
  3. Ameri, F. and Dutta, D. (2006), An upper ontology for manufacturing service description, 26th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, September, 10-13.
  4. Ameri, F. and Dutta, D. (2008), A matchmaking methodology for supply chain deployment in distributed manufacturing environments, Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 8(1), 011002-1-011002-9. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2830849
  5. Ameri, F., McArthur, C., Asiabanpour, B., and Hayasi, M. (2011), A web-based framework for semantic supplier discovery for discrete part manufacturing, 39th Annual SME North American Manufacturing Research Conference, Corbalis, Oregon, USA, June, 13-17.
  6. Ameri, F. and Patil, L. (2010), Digital manufacturing market : a semantic webbased framework for agile supply chain deployment, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1-16.
  7. Badri, M. A. (1999), Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal program ming for global facility location-allocation problem, International Journal of Production Economics, 62(3), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00249-7
  8. Chi, Y.-L. (2010), Rule-based ontological knowledge base for monitoring partners across supply networks, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1400-1407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.097
  9. Colucci, S., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Donini, F. M., and Mongiello, M. (2006), Concept abduction and contraction for semantic-based discovery of matches and negotiation spaces in an e-marketplace, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 4(4), 345-361.
  10. Fenves, S. J., Mani, M., Subrahmanian, E., and Jones, A. T. (2009), An enabler for supplier discovery in virtual supply chains : a shared terminology, NIST Interagency/Internal Report(NISTIR), 7647.
  11. Guo, J., Lam, I. H., Lei, I., Guan, X., Iong, P. H., and Ieong, M. C. (2006), Alibaba international : building a global electronic marketplace, IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, Shanghai, China, October, 24-26.
  12. Im, K., Lee J., Kim, B. H., Peng, Y., and Cho, H. (2011), Conceptual framework of supplier discovery via ontology-driven semantic reasoning, Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, Los Angeles, California, USA, October, 23-25.
  13. Javalgi, R. R., Dixit, A., and Scherer, R. F. (2009), Outsourcing to emerging markets: theoretical perspectives and policy implications, Journal of International Management, 15(2), 156-168.
  14. Kelle, P. and Akbulut, A. (2005), The role of ERP tools in supply chain information sharing, cooperation, and cost optimization, International Journal of Production Economics, 93-94, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.06.004
  15. Kim, J.-H. and Lee, B.-K. (2004), A study on selection of effective supplier and analysis of evaluation structure in supply chain management, IE Interfaces, 17(2), 169-179.
  16. Lavassani, K., Movahedi, B., and Kumar, V. (2009), Developments in theories of supply chain management: the case of B2B electronic marketplace adoption, The International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 9(6), 85-98.
  17. Lee, S. (2007), Collaboration hub : i-Manufacturing(manufacturing innovation in Korea) project, Journal of the KSME, 47(4), 45-51.
  18. McArthur, C. and Ameri, F. (2011), Knowledge representation for supplier discovery in distributed manufacturing, International Conference on Engineering Design, Copenhagen, Denmark, August, 15-18.
  19. MFG.com (2011), About MFG.com, Accessed on December 10, 2011 From http://www.mfg.com.
  20. Ouyang, Y. (2007), The effect of information sharing on supply chain stability and the bullwhip effect, European Journal of Operational Research, 182(3), 1107- 1121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.037
  21. Tversky, A. (1977), Features of similarity, Psychological Review, 84(4), 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
  22. Yoo, T., Kim, K., Song, S., Cho, H., and Yücesan, E. (2009), Applying web services technology to implement distributed simulation for supply chain modeling and analysis, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference(WSC 2009), Austin, Texas, USA, December, 13-16.
  23. Yoo, T., Cho, H., and Yücesan, E. (2010), Hybrid algorithm for discrete event simulation based supply chain optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2354-2361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.07.039
  24. Zhou, G., Min, H., and Gen, M. (2002), The balanced allocation of customers to multiple distribution centers in the supply chain network : a genetic algorithm approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43(1-2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00067-0