Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Inquiry Activities in High School Biology Textbooks Used in China and Korea

  • Received : 2012.07.31
  • Accepted : 2012.09.29
  • Published : 2012.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Inquiry activity is a major source of student investigation which both of the national curriculum standards strongly emphasize for achieving scientific literacy. The purpose of this study was to examine inquiry activities incorporated in high school biology textbooks used in China and Korea. The inquiry activities were examined with regard to inquiry level and science process skills. Bell's and a modification of Padilla's framework were used in these analyses. Results show that the Korean textbooks were more exclusively occupied by simple inquiry activities - None of them provided activity more complex than level 2 inquiry. In addition, the Korean textbooks had uniformly basic science process skills, whereas their Chinese counterparts gave students some challenges for higher level process skills. Therefore, it cannot be guaranteed that the activities in the Korean textbooks are helpful in guiding students toward a gradual progression to high-level inquiry. Implications for inquiry-based science education were suggested based on the results of the study.

Keywords

References

  1. Babai, R., & Dori, L. T. (2009). Several case lessons can improve students'control of variables reasoning scheme ability. Sci Educ Technol 18, 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9161-7
  2. Beautmont-Walters, Y., & Soyibi, K. (2001). An analysis of high school students' performance on five integrated science process skills. Research in Science and Technology education. 19(12), 133-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120087687
  3. Bell, L.R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher 72(7), 30-33.
  4. Chiappetta, E. L. (1997). Inquiry-based science. The Science Teacher, 22-26.
  5. Chiappetta, E. L., Koballa, T. R., & Collette, A. T. (1998). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  6. Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
  7. Hams, N. C. & Yager, R. E. (1981). What research says to the science teacher (Vol.3, No.471-114776). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
  8. Hofstein A. & Lunetta V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundation for the 21st century, Science Education, 88, 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
  9. Kim, SJ. (2011). Comparative analysis of high school biology curriculum for scientific literacy themes: The cases of China and Korea. dissertation, Beijing: Beijing Normal University.
  10. Knain, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(3), 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006901750066547
  11. McComas W (2005). Laboratory instruction in the service of science teaching and learning. Science Teacher 72(7), 24-29.
  12. Miller, R. (2008). Taking scientific literacy seriously as a curriculum aim. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 1-18.
  13. Ministry of Education, People's Republic of China [MOEC]. (2003). The Biology Curriculum Standards of High School. Beijing: People's Education Press (in Chinese).
  14. Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea [MOEK]. (1997). The Science Curriculum Standards. Seoul: Daehan Press (in Korean).
  15. Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea [MOEK]. (2007). The Revised science curriculum standards. Seoul: Daehan Press (in Korean).
  16. Mitchell, T. S. (2007). Levels of Inquiry: Content Analysis of the Three Most Commonly Used United States High School Biology Laboratory Manuals. dissertation, University of Southern California.
  17. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  18. Oh, PS. (2010). How can teachers help students formulate scientific hypotheses? Some strategies found in abductive inquiry activities of earth science, International Journal of Science Education, 32( 4), 541- 560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903104457
  19. Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. Research Matters - to the Science Teacher. No. 9004.
  20. Sadeh, I., & Zion, M. (2009). The development of dynamic inquiry performances within an open inquiry setting: A comparison to guided inquiry setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1137-1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20310
  21. Stewart, J. H. (1982). Difficulties experienced by high school students when learning basic Mendelian genetics. The American Biology Teacher, 44(2), 80-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/4447413