DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Analysis of Verbal Interaction on the Process of Elementary Students' Hypothesis Generation Learning

  • Received : 2012.06.30
  • Accepted : 2012.09.03
  • Published : 2012.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the verbal interaction during elementary students' hypothesis generation learning. For this study, 32 6th graders were selected and were assorted into heterogeneous small-groups by achievement levels. The topics of hypothesis generation learning were developed by analyzing the current elementary school curriculum. Each group's verbal interactions were audio/video taped and transcribed. After coding the protocol and having student retrospective interview, types and frequency of verbal interaction were analyzed. The frequency of verbal interaction during observation was highest and that of questioning situation identification was lowest. Regarding to the quality of verbal interactions, low level interactions were significantly frequent during observation. On the other hand, hypothetical explicans generation revealed high frequency of high level interactions. The results revealed that elementary students can make high level verbal interactions through hypothesis generation learning.

Keywords

References

  1. Adsit, D. J., & London, M. (1997). Effect of hypothesis generation on hypothesis testing in rule discovery tasks. Journal of General Psychology, 124(1), 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309709595505
  2. Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Smallgroup discussion in physics: Peer interaction modes in pairs and fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199612)33:10<1099::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N
  3. Chang, H. P., & Lederman, N. G. (1994). The effects of levels of cooperation within physical science achievement, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2), 167-181.
  4. Chang, U., & Lee, Y. (2000). The effect of lesson-based question generation and prior knowledge-based question generation on information and verbal interaction. Journal of Education Psychology, 14(1), 45-70.
  5. Han, J., & Noh, T. (2002). Students' Perceptions on Small Group Activities in Science Classes and the Relationship with Personality. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 499-507.
  6. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Jeong, J. (2007). The Structure and Type of Scientific Hypotheses on Zoological Tasks as Generated by Prospective Elementary School Teachers. Elementary Science Education, 26(2), 201-208.
  8. Jeong, J., Won, H., & Kwon, Y. (2005). Application of the Triple Abduction Model for Improving the Skills of Scientific Hypothesis Generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(5), 595-602.
  9. Jeong, M. (2002). The understanding and Practice of Cooperative Learning. Kyoyookbook.
  10. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  11. Kang, E., Shin, D., & Kwon, Y. (2006). Development of Elementary Students` Ability to Generate Hypothesis Knowledge through Knowledge Generation Learning in Science. Elementary Science Education, 25(3), 257-270.
  12. Kang, S., Han, S., Jeong Y., & Noh, T. (2001). Comparison of Verbal Interaction Patterns in Small - Group Discussion by Learning Strategies. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(2), 279-288.
  13. Kang, S., Kim, C., & Noh, T. (2000). Analysis of Verbal Interaction in Small Group Discussion. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(3), 353-363.
  14. Kim, H., Lee, E., & Kang, S. (2006). Analysis of Approachs to Learning Based on Student-Student Verbal Interactions according to the Type of Inquiry Experiments Using Everyday Materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(1), 16-24.
  15. Kim, K., Kim, S., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2007). The Effects of Reciprocal Peer Questioning Strategy in Concept Learning on the Three States of Matter and Motion of Molecule. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(5), 394-403.
  16. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1998). The Development of Scientific Thinking Skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  17. Kwon, Y. (1997). Linking Prefrontal Lobe Functions with Reasoning and Conceptual change. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation.
  18. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University. Kwon, Y., Jeong, J., & Lee, J. (2006). Types of Science Teachers` Tentative-Explanations about Biological Phenomena. The Korean journal of biological education, 34(2), 297-305.
  19. Kwon, Y., Jeong, J., Kang, M., & Park, Y. (2005). Patterns of Scientific Observation in Elementary and Secondary Science Teachers' Observing Biological Phenomena. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(3). 431-439.
  20. Kwon, Y., Jeong, J., Lee, J., & Lee, I. (2008). Generation and Evaluation of Scientific Knowledge. Seoul, Made.
  21. Kwon, Y., Yang, I., & Jeong, I. (2000). An Explorative Analysis of Hypothesis - Generation by Pre - service Science Teachers, Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(1), 29-42.
  22. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching: And the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: 10, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 16-17.
  23. Lawson, A. E. (2000). How do humans acquire knowledge? and what does that imply about the nature of knowledge? Science and Education, 9, 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008756715517
  24. Lee, A., Kwon, Y., Jeong, J., & Yang, I. (2007). The Study on Research Steps, Thinking Processes, Behavioral Patterns, and Generated Knowledges in Ethologists` Research Activities. The Korean journal of biological education, 35(3), 361-373.
  25. Lee, H., Jang, S., Seong, S., Lee, S., Kang, S., & Choi, B. (2002). Analysis of Student-Student Interaction in Interactive Science Inquiry Experiment. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 22(3), 660-670.
  26. Lim, H., & Noh, T. (2001). Verbal Interactions in Heterogeneous Small - group Cooperative Learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(4), 668-676.
  27. Noh, T., Kim, S., & Kim, K. (2005). The Effect of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring Strategy for Inducing Structured Students` Interaction in Middle School Science Instruction. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(4), 465-471.
  28. Seong, S., & Choi, B. (2007). Change and Characteristics of Interactions in a Heterogeneous Group in Scientific Inquiry Experiments. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 27(9), 870-880.
  29. Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.406
  30. Yang, I., Jeong, J., Kim, Y., Kim, M., & Cho, H. (2006). Analyses of the Aims of Laboratory Activity, Interaction, and Inquiry Process within Laboratory Instruction in Secondary School Science. Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society, 27(5), 509-520.
  31. Yang, J., Lee, H., Oh, C., Jeong, J., Kwon, Y., & Park, K. (2007). An Analysis of Social Interaction according to Students'Preference for Groups in Science Instruction of Elementary School. Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 1-11.