대한교통학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Transportation)

  • 제30권6호
  • /
  • Pages.81-92
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1229-1366(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-4217(eISSN)
대한교통학회 (Korean Society of Transportation)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

철도사업에서의 수단전환통행비율을 고려한 분석영향권 설정방법론의 개발

A Methodology for Defining the Study Impact Area Using Mode Diversion Trip Rate in Rail Infrastructure Feasibility Study

  • 전교석 (아주대학교 일반대학원) ;
  • 이규진 (TOD기반 지속가능 도시.교통연구센터) ;
  • 정우현 (TOD기반 지속가능 도시.교통연구센터) ;
  • 최기주 (아주대학교 교통시스템공학과)
  • Jeon, Gyo Seok (Graduate School, Ajou University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu Jin (TOD-based Sustainable City Transportation Research Center, Ajou University) ;
  • Chung, Woohyun (TOD-based Sustainable City Transportation Research Center, Ajou University) ;
  • Choi, Keechoo (Department of Transportation System Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 투고 : 2012.03.06
  • 심사 : 2012.12.06
  • 발행 : 2012.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

현재 예비타당성조사 지침에서는 수단전환이라는 대중교통수단이 가지는 특성을 고려하지 못한 채 도로부문의 영향권 설정기준을 철도사업과 같은 대중교통수단의 투자평가에도 적용하고 있어 문제가 발생하는 바, 본 연구에서는 대중교통수단 투자평가에 적용할 수 있는 영향권 설정지표와 기준을 제시하고자 하였다. 이에 가상의 사업을 설정하여 기존의 방법론과 본 연구 방법론을 적용하여 비교하였다. 분석결과 기존 방법론과 119억의 편익 차이가 발생하는 것으로 나타났으며, 영향권 내 수단전환 통행량의 수렴성은 본 연구 방법론이 수단전환통행량의 93%, 기존 방법론이 76%를 영향권 내에 포함하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구를 통해 대중교통수단의 투자평가에 범용적으로 적용할 수 있는 영향권 설정기준을 기존의 방법론과 비교하여 제시하였다.

The current Korean preliminary feasibility study guidebook provides a simple method for determining the impact area of a transportation project without taking its characteristics into account, which often leads travelers to switch their travel modes. Hence, this study develops a comprehensive methodology for defining the impact area when evaluating railroad projects, which can significantly affect travel mode choice behaviors. To develop the methodology, a hypothetical project was devised. The analysis results show that the convergence of mode-diverted trip rates is improved from 76% to 93% by implementing the proposed method. In addition, there was a significant difference in benefits (about 10.9 billion won) between adopting the current method and the proposed method.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Research Foundation of Korea

참고문헌

  1. AMPO Travel Model Work Group (2006), Using Summit for Transit and Model Analysis, pp.15-24.
  2. Caliper (2007), GIS User`s Guide, Caliper.
  3. Caliper (2007), Travel Demand Modeling with TransCAD 5.0, Caliper.
  4. Federal Transit Administration (2006), Discussion-piece #16: Calibration and Validation of Travel Models for New Starts Forecasting, pp.3-5.
  5. Cho S. D., Kim H. J., Chung J. H. (2007), A Study of Method to Define Effect Area at Transportation Demand Analysis, Proceedings of the KOR-KST 57th Conference, Korean Society of Transportation, pp.128-130.
  6. Kang K. S., Lee S. H., Shin D. S. (2007), A Study of Define Influence Area Considering V/C Variation Ratio, Proceedings of the KOR-KST 56th Conference, Korean Society of Transportation.
  7. Kim H. B., Lee J. W. (2005), The Impact Zone Measurement of the Private Investment Highway, Journal of Korean Planners Association, Vol.40, No.1, Korea Planners Association, pp.125-135.
  8. Kim J. H., Lim Y. T. (2012), A method of railway construction impact area using occupants in a preliminary feasibility study, The 66th Conference of Korean Society of Transportation, Korean Society of Transportation, pp107-112.
  9. Kim K. S., Oh D. K., Chung S. B. (2005), Development of Method to Define Influence Area using Travel Time in the Feasibility Study, J. Korean Soc. Transp., Vol.23, No.8, Korean Society of Transportation, pp.140-143.
  10. Korea Development Institute (2008), Korean Preliminary feasibility study guidebook (5th), Korea Development Institute.
  11. Song J. Y., Rho J. H. (1999), Development of Method to define Highway-Link Influence Area, Proceedings of the KOR-KST 36th Conference, Korean Society of Transportation, pp71-76.
  12. TRB (2007), TCRP Report 95, Chapter 17. Transit Oriented Development: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, TRB, pp.17-62- 17-63.
  13. TRB (2007), TCRP Report 95, Chapter 9. Transit Scheduling and Frequency: Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes, TRB, pp.9-23-9-24.
  14. Vuchic Vukan R. (2005), Urban Transit: Operations, Planning and Economics, John R. Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, N.J., pp.522-526.
  15. Yang J. C. (2003), Large Scale Public Investment Project Impact Measurement Alternatives on National and Regional Economies, Journal of Korean Planners Association, Vol.38, No.4, Korea Planners Association, pp.137-148.
  16. Yoon D. S. (2001), Transportation Demand Analysis, Pakyoungsa.

피인용 문헌

  1. 개인의 선호다양성을 고려한 지역간 수단선택 모형 구축 및 시간가치 추정 연구 vol.20, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7782/jksr.2017.20.2.288