Journal of Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회지)

Korean Society of Transportation (대한교통학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimating the Value of Travel Time for Intercity Leisure Trips

지역간 여가통행의 시간가치 산정 연구

  • Lee, Jang-Ho (Department of Railroad Facility Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
  • 이장호 (한국교통대학교 철도시설공학과)
  • Received : 2012.09.18
  • Accepted : 2012.11.19
  • Published : 2012.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The relative importance of leisure trip has been increased after adopting the five-day workweek system and considering the higher income level. Thus, the value of travel time for intercity leisure trips should be estimated to conduct a reasonable benefit/cost analysis for railway construction projects. In this paper, the value of travel time was estimated separately for each trip purpose such as business, leisure, and other non-business than leisure. The estimated values of leisure travel time ranged from 5,310 to 14,185 (won/hr) by altering travel mode, and were increased by 42-107% when comparing with those of non-business travel time. Besides, how to apply the value of intercity leisure travel time for B/C analysis of railway projects was suggested. For the construction case of a railway connecting Chuncheon and Sokcho, the estimated benefit was increased by 2.3%.

주 5일 근무제 시행과 소득수준 향상 등으로 인하여 지역간 통행에 있어서 여가통행의 비중이 높아짐에 따라 철도사업의 합리적 평가를 위한 여가통행의 시간가치 산정 및 적용방안 등의 마련이 필요하게 되었다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 업무, 여가, 여가제외 비업무 통행에 대하여 수단선택모형을 구축하여 한계대체율법에 의한 시간가치를 산정하고, 이를 기초로 업무통행 대비 여가통행, 비업무통행의 비율을 도출하여 최종적으로 한계임금율법에 의한 통행목적별 시간가치를 산정하였다. 분석결과 여가통행은 타 비업무목적 통행에 비하여 시간가치가 높은 것으로 분석되었으며, 이를 사례분석에 적용한 결과에서도 비업무통행 시간가치를 적용하는 기존 방법론에 비하여 편익이 다소 증가하는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Rail Network Authority

References

  1. Antoniou C., Matsoukis E., Roussi P. (2007), A Methodology for the Estimation of Value-of-Time Using State-of-the-Art Econometric Models, Journal of Public Transportation, Vol.10, No.3, pp1-19.
  2. Germany Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs (2003a), Evaluation procedure FTIP 2003, Part III B.
  3. Germany Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs (2003b), Federal Transport Infrastructure Plan 2003.
  4. Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2000), Appraisal Guide for Road Investment.
  5. Japan Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (2008), Manual of Benefit-Cost Analysis in Road Project.
  6. Jara-Diaz S. R., Munizaga M. A., Greeven P., Guerra R., Axhausen K. (2008), Estimating the Value of Leisure from a Time Allocation Model", Transportation Research Part B, Vol.42, pp.946-957 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2008.03.001
  7. Kim C. S. (1998), Theory of Tourism and Transportation, Daewang Publisher.
  8. Korea Development Institute (2008), A Study for Revising the Guideline of Pre-feasibility Survey for Road/Railroad Project (5th ed.).
  9. Korea Expressway Corporation, Expressway and Transportation Research Institute (2004), Forecasting the Future Leisure Trip in the Expressway and Establishing the Action Plan for the implementation of five-day workweek system.
  10. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (1999), Establishing the Analytical Method of Investment for Road Project.
  11. Lee H. K. (2006), A Study on Survey Method and Demand Forecast of Leisure Travel, The Korea Transport Institute.
  12. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (2011a), 2010 Statistical Yearbook of Traffic Volume.
  13. Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs (2011b), Appraisal Guide of Investment for Transportation Facility (4th ed.).
  14. Oh S. H, Ryu J. Y. (2006), A Study on Evaluation Process of Investment for Transportation Facilities Taking Leisure Travel Demand into Account, Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  15. Roh J. H. et al. (1994), Leisure Trip Behavior in Weekend and Factor Analysis, Journal of Korea Planners Association, Vol.29, No.4, Korea Planners Association, pp185-196.
  16. The Korea Transport Institute (2008a), 2007 Korea Transport Database, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  17. The Korea Transport Institute (2008b), Improving the Estimation Method of Benefit in the Feasibility Survey of Railroad Project, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  18. The Korea Transport Institute (2010), Research for the Appraisal Manual of Railroad Investment, Korea Railway Network Authority.
  19. U. K. Department for Transport (2011a), COBA (COst-Benefit Analysis).
  20. U. K. Department for Transport (2011b), Transport Analysis Guidance.
  21. U. K. Institute for Transport Studies (2003), Values of Travel Time Savings in the UK, University of Leeds.
  22. U. S. Department of Transportation (1997), The Value of Travel Time: Departmental Guidance for Conducting Economic Evaluations.