KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Structural Behavior of SC Walls in Nuclear Power Plant with Openings

개구부를 갖는 원전 SC구조 벽체의 구조거동 평가

  • 정철헌 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과) ;
  • 이한주 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Received : 2012.06.29
  • Accepted : 2012.08.19
  • Published : 2012.09.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The shear wall with openings built with reinforced concrete (RC) have been elaborately studied by many researchers, whereas the steel plate concrete (SC) wall structure has not been investigated as much. The recent SC wall structures developed in Korea have been partly applied to nuclear power plant structures, although its design specification or guideline for the SC wall structure with openings has not been completed yet. This study based on numerical analysis evaluates the effects of opening on the structural resistance of the SC structure in nuclear power plant. As a result from nonlinear analysis, since the strengthening for openings significantly affect the overall strength of SC wall, the openings should be considered to strengthen them around adjacent area. It is also proved that the strengthened openings have the sufficient resistance and ductility regardless their size, shape, location, and quantity.

지금까지 수행된 개구부가 존재하는 벽체에 대한 연구는 대부분 RC 벽체에 대해서 수행되었으며, SC(Steel plate Concrete) 벽체에 설치되는 개구부에 대한 연구는 수행된 예가 적다. 최근에 국내에서 개발된 SC 벽체는 원전구조물에 일부 적용되고 있지만, 관련 설계기준인 KEPIC-SNG에서도 개구부를 갖는 SC 벽체에 대한 설계법은 명확하게 정의되지 않았다. 본 연구에서는 원전구조물내 벽체에 설치되는 SC 벽체를 대상으로 개구부가 구조내력에 미치는 영향을 해석적 방법에 의해서 평가하였다. 비선형 해석 결과, 개구부가 설치되는 SC 벽체는 개구부 주변의 보강 여부가 내력에 미치는 영향이 크기 때문에 개구부 주변에 일정범위 이상의 보강이 이루어져야 하며, 개구부 주변이 보강된 경우는 개구부의 형상, 크기, 위치 및 설치개수에 관계없이 충분한 내력 및 연성을 확보할 수 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김원기, 이승준, 정철헌, 지남용(2010) SC구조 특정주제기술보고서:규제현안에 관한 실험적 연구 최종보고서, 한국수력원자력, 한국전력기술주식회사, 한국강구조학회.
  2. 대한전기협회(2010) KEPIC SNG 강판콘크리트구조, SN 원자력구조, 전력산업기준 (KEPIC).
  3. 최윤철, 최현기, 최창식 (2008) 슬래브가 있는 전단벽의 구조적 거동에 대한 개구부의 영향, 대한콘크리트학회 논문집, 대한콘크리트학회, 제20권 제1호, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2008.20.1.003
  4. ABAQUS User's Manual (2008) version 6.8, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc.
  5. ACI Committee 318 (2008) Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete(ACI 318-08) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Michigan, pp. 160-168.
  6. Ali, A. and Wight, J.K. (1990) Reinforced Concrete Structural Walls with Staggered Openning Configurations under Reversed Cyclic Loading, Report No. UMCE 90-05, Dept. of Civil Eng'g., Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 13-65.
  7. Architectural Institute of Japan (1966) Recommendations for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures, AIJ.
  8. Hognestad, E. (1951) A Study of Combined Bending and Axial Load in Reinforced Concrete Members, Bulletin 399, University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station, Urbana, Ill.
  9. Gintaris, K. and Jamshid, G. (1999) Stress-strain relations for cracked tensile concrete from RC beam tests, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 127, No. 1, pp. 64-73
  10. Taylor, C.P., Cote, P.A., and Wallace, J.W. (1998) Design of slender reinforced concrete walls with opennings, ACI Structural Journal, Vol. 95, No. 4, pp. 420-433.
  11. Yanez, F.V., Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1991) Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structural walls with regular and irregular opennings, pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, New Zealand, pp. 67-78.

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of Structural Capacity of SC Walls in Nuclear Power Plant accounting for the Area Lost to Openings vol.33, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.6.2181
  2. Experimental Comparison for Flexural Behavior of Concrete Filled Tubular and Double-Skinned Composite Tubular Columns vol.18, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2018.18.4.233