References
- Antonuk LE: Electronic portal imaging devices: a review and historical perspective of contemporary technologies and research. Phys Med Biol 47:31-65 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/2/401
- Gayou O, Miften M: Commissioning and clinical implementation of a mega-voltage conebeam CT system for treatment localization. Med Phys 34:3183-3192 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2752374
- Pouliot J, Bani-Hashemi A, Chen J, et al: Low-dose megavoltage cone-beam CT for radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 61:552-560 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.011
- Langen KM, Meeks SL, Poole DO, et al: The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations. Phys Med Biol 50:4259-4276 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/18/002
- Meeks SL, Harmon JF, Langen KM, et al: A Performance characterization of megavoltage computed tomography imaging on a helical tomotherapy unit. Med Phys 32:2673-2681 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1990289
- Pang G, Rowlands JA: Development of high quantum efficiency, flat panel, thick detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging: a novel direct conversion design and its feasibility. Med Phys 31:3004-3016 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1803771
- Sawant A, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, et al: Segmented phosphors: MEMS-based high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging. Med Phys 32:553-565 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1854774
- Sawant A, Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, et al: Segmented crystalline scintillators: An initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging. Med Phys 32:3067-3083 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2008407
- Rathee S, Tu D, Monajemi TT, et al: A bench-top megavoltage fan-beam CT using CdWO4-photodiode detectors. I. System description and detector characterization. Med Phys 33:1078-1089 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2181290
- Samant SS, Gopal A: Analysis of the kinestatic charge detection system as a high detective quantum efficiency electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys 33:3557-3667 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2241991
- Samant SS, Gopal A: Study of a prototype high quantum efficiency thick scintillation crystal video-electronic portal imaging device. Med Phys 33:2783-2791 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2216877
- Judy PF: The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. Med Phys 3:233-236 (1976) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594283
- Cunningham IA, Fenster A: A method for modulation transfer function determination from edge profiles with correction for finiteelement differentiation. Med Phys 14:533-537 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596064
- Samei E, Flynn MJ, Reimann DA: A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Med Phys 25:102-113 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598165
- Buhr EG, Gunther-Kohfahl S, Neitzel U: Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled MTF of a digital radiographic system from an edge image. Med Phys 30: 2323-2331 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1598673
- Metz CE, Doi K: Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. Phys Med Biol 24:1079-1106 (1979) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/24/6/001
- Fujita H, Tsai DY, Itoh T, et al: A simple method for determining the modulation transferfunction in digital radiography IEEE Trans. Med Imaging 11:34-39 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1109/42.126908
- Dobbins JT, Ergun DL, Rutz L, et al: DQE_f_ of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. Med Phys 22:1581-1593 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597627
- Droege RT, Morin RL: A practical method to measure the MTF of CT scanners. Med Phys 9:758-760 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595124
- Droege RT, Rzeszotarski MS: An MTF method immune to aliasing. Med Phys 12:721-725 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595654
- Munro P, Rawlinson JA, Fenster A: Therapy imaging (A signal-to-noise analysis of a fluoroscopic imaging system for radiotherapy localization). Med Phys 17:763-772 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596474
- El-Mohri Y, Jee KW, Antonuk LE, et al: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency of a prototype, megavoltage indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager. Med Phys 28: 2538-2550 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1413516
- Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Siewerdsen JH, et al: Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation. Med Phys 24:51-70 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597918
- Antonuk LE, El-Mohri Y, Huang W, et al: Initial performance evaluation of an indirect-detection, active matrix flat-panel imager AMFPI_ prototype for megavoltage imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 42:437-454 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(98)00210-7
- Park HS, Cho HM, Jung J, et al: Comparison of the image Noise Power Spectra for Computed Radiography. Korean Phys Soc 54:236-243 (2009) https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.54.236
- Cho HS, Ghoi SG, Lee BS, et al: Image quality evaluation of highly-intergrated digital X-ray imaging sensor for dental intraoral- imaging applications. Korean Phys Soc 51:30-34 (2007) https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.51.30
- Rampado O, Isoardi P, Ropolo R: Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters. Phys Med Biol 51:1577-1593 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/6/015
- Ciantar D, Fitzgerald M, Cotterill AD, et al: Correlation between quantitative and subjective assessment of image quality in paediatric radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim 90:185-188 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033115
- Rogers DWO: Fluence to dose equivalent conversion factors calculated with EGS3 for electrons from 100 keV to 20 GeV and photons from 20 keV to 20 GeV. Health Physics 46: 891-914 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-198404000-00015
- Mohan R, Chui CS, Lidofsky L: Energy and angular distributions of photons from linear accelerators. Med Phys 12: 592-597 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595680
- Giger ML, Doi K: Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 1. Modulation transfer function. Med Phys 11: 287-295 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595629
- Giger ML, Doi K, Metz CE: Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 2. Noise Wiener Spectrum. Med Phys 11:797-805 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595583
- Dobbins III JT, Samei E, Ranger NT, et al: Intercomparison of methods for image quality characterization. II. Noise power spectrum. Med Phys 33:1466-1475 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2188819
- Nath R, Biggs PJ, Bova FJ, et al: AAPM code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators AAPM code of practice for radiotherapy accelerators. Med Phys 21:1093-1121 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597398
- Min JW, Suh TS, Choe BY, et al: Comparison of noise power spectrum methodologies in measurements by using megavoltage X-ray energies. Korean Phys Soc 60:129-136 (2012) https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.60.129
- Gopal A, Samant SS: Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics. Med Phys 36: 2006-2015 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3099559