DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TREATMENT OF CROWN-ROOT FRACTURE USING FIBER-REINFORCED POST: A CASE STUDY

섬유강화형 포스트를 이용한 치관-치근 파절의 치료: 증례 보고

  • Lim, Hwa-Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • La, Ji-Young (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Hee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • An, So-Youn (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Yun-Hee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Keum, Ki-Seok (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Bong (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 임화신 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 라지영 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이광희 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 안소연 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김윤희 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 금기석 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 이상봉 (원광대학교 치과대학 소아치과학교실)
  • Received : 2011.09.20
  • Accepted : 2012.01.05
  • Published : 2012.02.29

Abstract

The crown-root fracture is defined as a fracture of tooth that contains enamel, dentin and cementum with or without pulp exposure. Generally the fracture lines place obliquely from labial surface, between incisal edge of the crown and marginal gingiva, to palatal surface subgingivally. If the fracture line is located supragingivally, the removal of tooth fragment and supragingival restoration can be performed. In subgingival fracture line, the surgical exposure, orthodontic eruption or surgical eruption can be considered. If the fracture line is too deep to restorate, extraction or decoronation can be selected. In children and adolescents, the extraction should be the last option. Another option to select before extraction is the restoration using fiber-reinforced post and the reattachment of tooth fragment. The fiber-rainforced post enhances the retention and the durability of tooth fragment. The reattachment of crown fragment using resin adhesive system is considered minimal invasive treatment biologically. This case reports the treatment of crown-root fracture using the reattachment of crown fragment and the insertion of fiber-reinforced post.

치관-치근 파절은 법랑질, 상아질, 백악질이 모두 포함된 치아의 파절로, 파절선이 대부분 절단연이나 순측의 변연부 치은에서 구개측 치은열구 하방으로 사선으로 진행된다. 파절선의 위치가 치은 연상이라면 파절편의 제거 및 치은연상 수복을 시행하고, 치은 연하라면 파절면의 외과적 노출술, 교정적 정출술, 외과적 정출술을 이용한 치아의 수복이 이루어진다. 그 외에 섬유 강화형 포스트를 삽입하여 치관 수복물의 유지력을 높이고, 레진 접착 시스템을 사용하여 치관 파절편을 재부착함으로써 생물학적으로 최소한으로 침습적인 치료를 하는 방법도 있다. 만약 파절의 정도가 치은 연하로 깊은 경우 발치나 치관절제술을 이용한 치근의 유지 등을 고려할 수 있다. 본 증례는 치관-치근파절로 내원한 12세 환아로 섬유강화형 포스트를 사용하여 치관 파절편 재부착을 시행하였으며 양호한 경과를 보여 이를 보고하는 바이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andreasen JO, Andreasen FM, Andersson L : Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, chapter 15, 2008.
  2. Jarvinen S : Incisal overjet and traumatic injuries to upper permanent incisors : a retrospective study. Acta Odontol Scand, 36:359-362, 1978. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357809029088
  3. Chan AK, Cheung GS, Ho MW : Different treatment outcomes of two intruded permanent incisors : a case report. Dent Traumatol, 17:275-280, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.170606.x
  4. Bruszt P : Secondary eruption of teeth intruded into the maxilla by a blow. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 11:146-149, 1958. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(58)90056-2
  5. Prabhakar AR, Kurthukoti AJ, Kayalvizhi G : A comparison of impact strength of fragment-bonded anterior teeth using three different restorative materials : an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, 25(2):88-92, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-4388.33455
  6. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO : Impact strength of teeth restored by fragment-bonding. Endod Dent Traumatol, 16:151-153, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2000.016004151.x
  7. Farik B, Munksgaard EC : Fracture strength of intact and fragment-bonded teeth at various velocities of the applied force. Eur J Oral Sci, 107:70-73, 1999.
  8. Andreasen FM, Noren JG, Andreasen JO, et al. : Long-term survival of fragment bonding in the treatment of fractured crowns: a multicenter clinical study. Quintessence Int, 26:669-681, 1995.
  9. Pusman E, Cehreli ZC, Altay N, et al. : Fracture resistance of tooth fragment reattachment: effects of different preparation techniques and adhesive material. Dent Traumatol, 26:9-15, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00855.x
  10. Stellini E, Stomaci D, Stomaci M, el al. : Fracture strength of tooth fragment reattachments with postpone bevel and overcontour reconstruction. Dent traumatol, 24:283-288, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2007.00539.x
  11. Pagliarini A, Rubini R, Rea M, Campese M : Crown fractures: effectiveness of current enamel-dentin adhesives in reattachment of fractured fragments. Quintessence Int, 31:133-136, 2000.
  12. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, Kreiborg S : Fractured teeth bonded with dentin adhesives with and without unfilled resin. Dent Traumatol, 18:66- 69, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.180203.x
  13. Goracci C, Bertelli E, Ferrari M : Bonding to worn or fractured incisal edges: shear bond strength of new adhesive systems. Quintessence Int, 35:21-27, 2004.
  14. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Andreasen JO, Kreiborg S : Drying and rewetting anterior crown fragments prior to bonding. Endod Dent Traumatol, 15:113- 116, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00766.x
  15. Tamse A : Iatrogenic vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol, 4:190-196, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1988.tb00321.x
  16. Capp CI, Roda MI, Tamaki R, et al. : Reattachment of rehydrated dental fragment using two techniques. Dent Traumatol, 25:95-99, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00715.x
  17. Christensen GJ : When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. J Am Dent Assoc, 127:1397-1398, 1996. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0459
  18. Chrestensen GJ : necessary or unnecessary? J Am Dent Assoc, 127:1522-1524, 1996.
  19. Rosentritt M, Fu¨rer C, Behr M, et al. : Comparison of vitro fracture strength of metallic and toorhcoloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil, 27:595- 601, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00548.x
  20. Dietschi D, Jacoby T, Dietschi JM, Schatz JP : Treatment of traumatic injuries in the front teeth: restorative aspects in crown fracture. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 12:751-758, 2000.
  21. Gargiulo AW, Wentz F, Orban B : Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontal Res, 32:261-267, 1961. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1961.32.3.261
  22. Vacek JS, Gher ME, Assad DA, et al. : The dimensions of the human dentogingival junction. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 14:154-165, 1994.
  23. Tal H, Soldinger M, Dreiangel A, Pitaru S : Periodontal response to long-term abuse of the gingival attachment by supracrestal amalgam restorations. J Clin Periodontol, 16:654-659, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1989.tb01035.x
  24. Gunay H, Seeger A, Tschernitschek H, Geurtsen W : Placement of the preparation line and periodontal health - a prospective 2-year clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20:171-181, 2000.
  25. Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL : Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J clin Periodontol, 30:379-385, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.01277.x
  26. Ingber JS, Rose LF, Coslet JG : The" biologic width" - a concept in periodontics and restorative dentistry. Alpha Omegan, 70:62-65, 1977.
  27. Eichelsbacher F, Denner W, Klaiber B, Schlagenhauf U : Periodontal status of teeth with crown-root fractures: results two years after adhesive fragment reattachment. J Clin Periodontol, 36:905-911, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01458.x
  28. Dragoo MR : Resin-ionomer and hybrid-ionomer cements: Part II. Human clinical and histologic wound healing responses in specific periodonal lesions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 17:75- 87, 1997.
  29. Martens LC, Beyls HM, de Craene LG, D'Hauwers RF : Reattachment of the original fragment after vertical crown fracure of a permanent central incisor. J Pedod, 13:53-62, 1988.
  30. Martins TM, Bosco AF, No′brega FJ, et al. : Periodontal tissue response to coverage of root cavities restored with resin materials: A histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol, 78:1075-1082, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060457
  31. Frantz B, Polson A : Tissue interactions with dentin specimens after demineralization using tetracycline. J Periodontol, 59:714-721, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.11.714
  32. Koparal E, Ilgenli T : Reattachment of a subgingivally fractured central incisor tooth fragment: report of a case. J Clin Pediatr Dent, 23:113-115, 1999.
  33. 대한소아치과학회 : 소아.청소년 치과학 제 4판. 신흥 인터내셔날, 서울, 446-448, 2007.
  34. Lear C, Moorrees C : Buccolingual muscle force and dental arch form. Am J Orthod, 56:379-393, 1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(69)80005-9
  35. Proffit W : Equilibrium theory revisited: Factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthod, 48:75-186, 1978.
  36. Selwyn S : An assessment of patients with periodontally involved migrated incisors. J Dentistry, 1:153- 157, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(73)90027-4
  37. Martinez-Canut P, Carrasquer A, Magan R, Lorca A : A study on factors associated with pathologic tooth migration. J Clin Periodontol, 24:492-497, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1997.tb00217.x