DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vapor-liquid Interface of Argon by Using a Test-area Simulation Method

  • Lee, Song-Hi (Department of Chemistry, Kyungsung University)
  • Received : 2011.10.17
  • Accepted : 2011.11.17
  • Published : 2012.01.20

Abstract

A test-area molecular dynamics simulation method for the vapor-liquid interface of argon through a Lennard-Jones intermolecular potential is presented in this paper as a primary study of interfacial systems. We found that the calculated density profile along the z-direction normal to the interface is not changed with time after equilibration and that the values of surface tension computed from this test-area method are fully consistent with the experimental data. We compared the thermodynamic properties of vapor argon, liquid argon, and argon in the vapor-liquid interface. Comparisons are made with kinetic and potential energies, diffusion coefficient, and viscosity.

Keywords

References

  1. Rowlinson, J. S.; Widom, B. Theory of Capillarity; Oxford: Clarendon: 1982.
  2. Henderson, D. Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids; New York: Dekker: 1992.
  3. Davis, H. T. Statistical Mechanics of Phases, Interfaces, and Thin Films; Weinheim: VCH: 1996.
  4. van der Waals, J. D. Z. Phys. Chem. 1894, 13, 657.
  5. English translation, Rowlinson, J. S. J. Stat. Phys. 1979, 20, 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01011513
  6. Nicholson, D.; Parsonage, N. G. Computer Simulation and Statistical Mechanics of Adsorption; London: Academic: 1982.
  7. Shelley, J. C.; Shelly, M. Y. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 5, 101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(00)00042-X
  8. Tobias, D. J.; Tu, K. C.; Klein, M. L. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 2, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(97)80004-0
  9. Saiz, L.; Klein, M. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 482. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar010167c
  10. Martin del Rio, E.; de Miguel, E. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 55, 2916. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.55.2916
  11. Bates, M.; Zannoni, C. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997, 280, 40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(97)01089-0
  12. Mills, S. J.; Care, C. M.; Near, M. P.; Cleaver, D. J. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58, 3284. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.58.3284
  13. de Miguel, E.; Martin del Rio, E. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 1999, 10, 431. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183199000322
  14. Akino, N.; Schmid, F.; Allen, M. P. Phys. Rev. E 2001, 63, 041706. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.63.041706
  15. Galindo, A; Haslam, A. J.; Varga, S.; Jackson, G.; Vanakaras, A.; Photinos, D. J.; Dunmur, D. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 12740. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1807833
  16. Gloor, G. J.; Jackson, G.; Blas, F. J.; de Miguel, E. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 134703. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2038827
  17. Bennet, C. H. J. Comput. Phys. 1976, 22, 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(76)90078-4
  18. Binder, K. Phys. Rev. A 1982, 25, 1699. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.25.1699
  19. Allen, M. P.; Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids; Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press: 1987; p 64.
  20. Swope, W. C.; Andersen, H. C.; Berens, P. H.; Wilson, K. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 637. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.442716
  21. Hoover, W. G. Phys. Rev. A 1985, 31, 1695. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
  22. Nose, S. Mol. Phys. 1984, 52, 255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978400101201
  23. Lee, S. H. Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 1371. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2007.28.8.1371
  24. NIST Chemistry WebBook. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/ fluid (accessed 2011).
  25. Zhou, D.; Zeng, M.; Mi, J.; Zhong, C. J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115, 57. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp104969c
  26. Lee, J. K.; Barker, J. K. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 60, 1976. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1681303
  27. Janecek, J. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 6264. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp056344z

Cited by

  1. Pressure Analyses at the Planar Surface of Liquid-Vapor Argon by a Test-Area Molecular Dynamics Simulation vol.33, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.9.3039
  2. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a Small Drop of Liquid Argon vol.33, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.11.3805