DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prediction for Thickness and Fracture of Stainless Steel-Aluminum-Magnesium Multilayered Sheet during Warm Deep Drawing

온간 딮 드로잉에서 이종금속판재(STS430-Al3004-AZ31)의 파단 및 두께 예측을 위한 연구

  • 이영선 (한국기계연구원 부설 재료연구소 변형제어연구그룹) ;
  • 이광석 (한국기계연구원 부설 재료연구소 변형제어연구그룹) ;
  • 김대용 (한국기계연구원 부설 재료연구소 변형제어연구그룹)
  • Received : 2011.10.21
  • Accepted : 2011.11.30
  • Published : 2012.02.01

Abstract

It is difficult to estimate the properties of multilayered sheet because they are composed of one or more different materials. Plastic deformation behavior of the multilayered sheet is quite different as compared to each material individually. The deformation behavior of multilayered sheet should be investigated in order to prevent forming defects and to predict the properties of the formed part. In this study, the mechanical properties and formability of stainless steel-aluminum-magnesium multilayered sheet were investigated. The multilayered sheet needs to be deformed at an elevated temperature because of its poor formability at room temperature. Uniaxial tensile tests were performed at various temperatures and strain rates. Fracture patterns changed mainly at a temperature of $200^{\circ}C$. Uniform and total elongation of multilayered sheet increased to values greater than those of each material when deformed at $250^{\circ}C$. The limiting drawing ratio (LDR) was obtained using a circular cup deep drawing test to measure the formability of the multilayered sheet. A maximum value for the LDR of about 2 was achieved at $250^{\circ}C$, which is the appropriate forming temperature for the Mg alloy. Fracture patterns on a circular cup and thickness of formed part were predicted by a rigid-viscoplastic FEM analysis. Two kinds of modeling techniques were used to simulate deep drawing process of multilayered sheet. A single-layer FE-model, which combines the three different layers into a macroscopic single layer, predicted well the thickness distribution of the drawn cup. In contrast, the location and the time of fracture were estimated better with a multi-layer FE model, which used different material properties for each of the three layers.

Keywords

References

  1. H. Y. Ryu, Y. E. Kim, J. H. Kim, W. J. Chung, 2001, An elasto-plastic analysis on deep drawing of clad sheet metal, Trans. Mater. Process, Vol.10, No. 5, pp. 411-417.
  2. J. H. Jung, Y. S. Lee, Y. N. Kwon, J. H. Lee, 2008, Forming limits diagram of AZ31 alloy sheet with the deformation mode, Trans. Mater. Process, Vol.17, No.7, pp. 473-480. https://doi.org/10.5228/KSPP.2008.17.7.473
  3. K. Iwanaga, H. Tashiro, H. Okamoto, K. Shimizu, 2004, Improvement of formability from room Temperature to warm temperature in AZ-31 magnesium alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol.155, pp. 1313-1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.181
  4. F. K. Chen, T. B. Huang, C. K. Chang, 2003, Deep drawing of square cups with magnesium ally AZ31 sheet, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol.43, No. 15, pp. 1553-1559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00198-6
  5. J. E. Lee, D. H. Bae, W. S. Chung, K. H. Km, J. H. Lee, Y. R. Cho, 2007, Effects of annealing on the mechanical and interface properties of stainless steel/aluminum/cupper clad-metal sheets, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol.187-188, pp. 546-549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.121
  6. H. D. Manesh, K. Taheri, 2003, Bond strength and formability of an aluminum-clad steel sheet, J. Alloys Compd., Vol.361, pp. 138-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00392-X
  7. T. Mori and S. Kurimoto, 1996, Press-formability of stainless steel and aluminum clad sheet, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol.56, pp. 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(95)01838-7
  8. F. Yoshida, R. Hino, 1997, Forming limit of stainless steel-clad aluminum clad sheet under plane stress condition, J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol.63, pp. 66-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(96)02601-5
  9. M. H. Parsa, K. Yamaguchi, N. Takakura, 2001, Redrawing analysis of aluminum-stainless steel laminated sheet using FEM simulations and experiments, Int. J. Mech. Sci., Vol. 43, No. 10, pp. 2331-2347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00038-8
  10. T. Oya, N. Tiesler, S. Kawanishi, J. Yanagimoto, T. Koseki, 2010, Experimental and numerical analysis of multilayered steel sheets upon bending, J. Mater. Process. Tech., Vol. 210, No. 14, pp. 1926-1933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.003
  11. B. K. Hwang, K. S. Lee, S. E. Hong, Y. S. Lee, 2011, Temperature and strain rate dependent tension properties of stainless steel-aluminum-magnesium multilayered sheet fabricated by roll bonding, Trans. Mater. Process, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 257-264. https://doi.org/10.5228/KSTP.2011.20.3.257
  12. W. J. Kim, H. K. Kim, W. Y. Kim, S. W. Han, 2008, Temperature and strain rate effect incorporated failure criteria for sheet forming of magnesium alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, Vol.488, No. 1-2, pp. 468-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.077