DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance and Cost of Disposable Biopsy Forceps in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison with Reusable Biopsy Forceps

  • Lim, Chul-Hyun (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Myung-Gyu (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Won-Chul (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Yu-Kyung (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jae-Myung (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, In-Seok (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Woo (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Kyu-Yong (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, In-Sik (Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2011.03.14
  • Accepted : 2012.02.02
  • Published : 2012.03.30

Abstract

Background/Aims: It is believed that disposable biopsy forceps are more costly than reusable biopsy forceps. In this study, we evaluated performance and cost of disposable forceps versus reusable forceps in esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy. Methods: Between October 2009 and July 2010, we enrolled 200 patients undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopic biopsy at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital. Biopsies were performed with 100 disposable or 5 reusable forceps by random assignment. Seventy-five additional patients were studied to estimate durability of reusable forceps. The assisting nurses estimated the performance of the forceps. The evaluation of costs included purchase prices and reprocessing costs. The adequacy of the sample was estimated according to the diameter of the obtained tissue. Results: Performance of disposable forceps was estimated as excellent in 97.0%, good in 2.0% and adequate in 1.0%. Reusable forceps were estimated as excellent in 36.0%, good in 36.0%, adequate in 25.1% and inadequate in 2.9%. The performance of reusable forceps declined with the number of uses. The reprocessing cost of reusable forceps for one biopsy session was calculated as \8,021. The adequacy of the sample was excellent for both forceps. Conclusions: Disposable forceps showed excellent performance. Considering the reprocessing costs of reusable forceps, usage of disposable forceps with a low price should be considered.

Keywords

Cited by

  1. Steps of Reprocessing and Equipments vol.46, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.274
  2. Current Status of Endoscope Reprocessing in Korea vol.48, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.1.1
  3. High-level disinfection of gastrointestinal endoscope reprocessing vol.5, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v5.i1.33
  4. Role of Clinical Endoscopy in Emphasizing Endoscope Disinfection vol.48, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.5.351
  5. Evaluating Quality and Adequacy of Gastrointestinal Samples Collected using Reusable or Disposable Forceps vol.30, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14354
  6. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing vol.50, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.029
  7. Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (KSGE) Guidelines for Endoscope Reprocessing vol.92, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2017.92.3.239
  8. Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guideline on Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories vol.53, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2020.106
  9. Multidisciplinary and Multisociety Practice Guidelines for Reprocessing Flexible Gastrointestinal Endoscopes and Endoscopic Accessories; Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, the Korean Socie vol.95, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2020.95.5.325
  10. An Economic Analysis of Direct Costs of Distal Radius Fixation and the Implications of a Disposable Distal Radius Kit vol.35, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002049