Cited by
- Age-specific prevalence of serrated lesions and their subtypes by screening colonoscopy: a retrospective study vol.14, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230x-14-82
- The Prevalence of Colorectal Adenomas in Asymptomatic Korean Men and Women vol.23, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0682
- Economic Burden of Colorectal Cancer in Korea vol.47, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2014.47.2.84
- A Survey of Colonoscopic Surveillance After Polypectomy vol.30, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.88
- Do We Need Colonoscopy Following Acute Diverticulitis Detected on Computed Tomography to Exclude Colorectal Malignancy? vol.59, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3151-1
- Clinical features and course of ulcerative colitis diagnosed in asymptomatic subjects vol.8, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2014.03.002
- Comparing the effectiveness of competing tests for reducing colorectal cancer mortality: a network meta-analysis vol.81, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.033
- Background and significance of Korean national cancer screening guideline revision vol.58, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.4.274
- Risk Factors for Delayed Post-Polypectomy Bleeding vol.13, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2015.13.2.160
- Distribution of the Colonoscopic Adenoma Detection Rate According to Age: Is Recommending Colonoscopy Screening for Koreans Over the Age of 50 Safe? vol.31, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.2.46
- The Korean guideline for colorectal cancer screening vol.58, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.5.420
- Risk Factors Such as Male Sex, Smoking, Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, and Fatty Liver Do Not Justify Screening Colonoscopies Before Age 45 vol.61, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3912-5
- Does Low Threshold Value Use Improve Proximal Neoplasia Detection by Fecal Immunochemical Test? vol.61, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4169-3
- Endoscopic Resection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Band Ligation and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vol.2016, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6198927
- Characteristics of and risk factors for colorectal neoplasms in young adults in a screening population vol.22, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2981
- Is a Preoperative Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Second Primary Cancer Detection in Head and Neck Cancer Necessary? Ten-year Registry Data vol.68, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2016.68.1.23
- Risk of developing advanced colorectal neoplasia after removing high‐risk adenoma detected at index colonoscopy in young patients: A KASID study vol.31, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13167
- Colorectal cancer screening of the general population in East Asia vol.28, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12579
- High levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and smoking might be markers of colorectal adenoma in Korean males aged 40-49 years vol.33, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2016.33.1.13
- Effect of Previous Gastrectomy on the Performance of Postoperative Colonoscopy vol.16, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.167
- Advanced Colonic Neoplasia at Follow-up Colonoscopy According to Risk Components and Adenoma Location at Index Colonoscopy: A Retrospective Study of 1,974 Asymptomatic Koreans vol.11, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl16402
- Biomedical optical spectroscopy for the early diagnosis of gastrointestinal neoplasms vol.39, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1010428317717984
- Training in Endoscopy: Colonoscopy vol.50, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2017.077
- A simple scoring model for advanced colorectal neoplasm in asymptomatic subjects aged 40–49 years vol.17, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0562-9
- Screening of colorectal cancer: present and future vol.17, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2017.1392243
- The prognostic implications of primary tumor location on recurrence in early-stage colorectal cancer with no associated risk factors vol.33, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3031-9
- Guideline Adherence to Colonoscopic Surveillance Intervals after Polypectomy in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Survey vol.12, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl17403
- Anatomical distribution and detection rate of colorectal neoplasms according to age in the colonoscopic screening of a Korean population vol.94, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.1.36
- Systematic review of colorectal cancer screening guidelines for average-risk adults: Summarizing the current global recommendations vol.24, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.124
- Risk of metachronous neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy in young patients with colorectal neoplasia vol.87, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.053
- Stages of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Test and Colonoscopy Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Korea vol.50, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2017.075
- Risk of developing metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients aged 30 to 39 and 40 to 49 years vol.88, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.05.018
- Bowel preparation for colonoscopy may decrease the levels of testosterone in Korean men vol.9, pp.None, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43598-5
- Increasing Trend in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Asia: More Cancers in Men and More Rectal Cancers vol.114, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000133
- Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years vol.34, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e101
- Optimal colonoscopy surveillance interval period for the adenoma patients who had an adequate polypectomy at baseline colonoscopy vol.28, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/cej.0000000000000414
- A Novel Blood‐Based Colorectal Cancer Diagnostic Technology Using Electrical Detection of Colon Cancer Secreted Protein‐2 vol.6, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201802115
- Colonic Intramucosal Cancer in the Interposed Colon Treated with Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Case Report and Review of Literature vol.52, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.129
- A Comparative Study Evaluating the Incidence of Colorectal Neoplasia(s) in Candidates for Bariatric Surgery by Screening Colonoscopy, 40-49 Versus 50-65 Years Old: a Preliminary Study vol.29, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-03819-2
- The Rise of Colorectal Cancer in Asia: Epidemiology, Screening, and Management vol.21, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-019-0703-8
- Stool-Based miR-92a and miR-144* as Noninvasive Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer Screening vol.97, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1159/000500639
- IMMUNOCHROMATOGRAPHIC TEST FOR DETECTION OF FECAL OCCULT BLOOD vol.64, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.18821/0869-2084-2019-64-9-536-540
- Factors Associated With Colonoscopy Compliance Based on Health Belief Model in a Community-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Shanghai, China vol.41, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/0272684x19897356
- Gastrointestinal and Nongastrointestinal Complications of Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and Colonoscopy in the Real World: A Nationwide Standard Cohort Using the Common Data Model Database vol.15, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl20222
- Optimal postoperative surveillance strategies for stage III colorectal cancer vol.13, pp.9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.1012
- Tumor Size >5 cm and Harvested LNs <12 Are the Risk Factors for Recurrence in Stage I Colon and Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection vol.13, pp.21, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13215294
- Colon Polyp Detection in Primary Health Care Institutions of Korea: Detection Rate and Issues with Following the Guidelines vol.78, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2021.123
- Evaluation of the Cut-Off Value of Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening during Health Checkups vol.43, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15263/jlmqa.2021.43.4.190