DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Small Submucosal Tumors of the Stomach: Differentiation of Gastric Schwannoma from Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with CT

  • Choi, Jin-Wook (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Dong-Il (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Mee (Departments of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Sohn, Tae-Sung (Departments of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Haeng (Departments of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Jung (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Soon-Jin (Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2012.08.01

Abstract

Objective: To identify the CT features that help differentiate gastric schwannomas (GS) from small (5 cm or smaller) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and to assess the growth rates of both tumors. Materials and Methods: We included 16 small GSs and 56 GISTs located in the stomach. We evaluated the CT features including size, contour, surface pattern, margins, growth pattern, pattern and degree of contrast enhancement, and the presence of intralesional low attenuation area, hemorrhage, calcification, surface dimpling, fistula, perilesional lymph nodes (LNs), invasion to other organs, metastasis, ascites, and peritoneal seeding. We also estimated the tumor volume doubling time. Results: Compared with GISTs, GSs more frequently demonstrated a homogeneous enhancement pattern, exophytic or mixed growth pattern, and the presence of perilesional LNs (each p < 0.05). The intralesional low attenuation area was more common in GISTs than GSs (p < 0.05). Multivariate analyses indicated that a homogeneous enhancement pattern, exophytic or mixed growth pattern, and the presence of perilesional LNs were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Tumor volume doubling times for GSs (mean, 1685.4 days) were significantly longer than that of GISTs (mean, 377.6 days) (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Although small GSs and GISTs show similar imaging findings, GSs more frequently show an exophytic or mixed growth pattern, homogeneous enhancement pattern, perilesional LNs and grow slower than GISTs.

Keywords

References

  1. Day DD, Jass JR, Price AB, Shepherd NA, Sloan JM, Talbot IC, et al. Morson & dawson's gastrointestinal pathology. Massachusetts: Blackwell Science Ltd., 2003
  2. Nishida T, Hirota S. Biological and clinical review of stromal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Histol Histopathol 2000;15:1293-1301
  3. Okai T, Minamoto T, Ohtsubo K, Minato H, Kurumaya H, Oda Y, et al. Endosonographic evaluation of c-kit-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:301- 307 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-002-0055-x
  4. Hong HS, Ha HK, Won HJ, Byun JH, Shin YM, Kim AY, et al. Gastric schwannomas: radiological features with endoscopic and pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 2008;63:536-542 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.026
  5. Jung MK, Jeon SW, Cho CM, Tak WY, Kweon YO, Kim SK, et al. Gastric schwannomas: endosonographic characteristics. Abdom Imaging 2008;33:388-390 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9291-4
  6. Levy AD, Quiles AM, Miettinen M, Sobin LH. Gastrointestinal schwannomas: CT features with clinicopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:797-802 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840797
  7. Levy AD, Remotti HE, Thompson WM, Sobin LH, Miettinen M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2003;23:283-304;456; quiz 532 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.232025146
  8. Ghanem N, Altehoefer C, Furtwangler A, Winterer J, Schafer O, Springer O, et al. Computed tomography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1669-1678 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1803-6
  9. Kim JY, Lee JM, Kim KW, Park HS, Choi JY, Kim SH, et al. Ectopic pancreas: CT findings with emphasis on differentiation from small gastrointestinal stromal tumor and leiomyoma. Radiology 2009;252:92-100 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2521081441
  10. Kim JK, Won JH, Cho YK, Kim MW, Joo HJ, Suh JH. Glomus tumor of the stomach: CT findings. Abdom Imaging 2001;26:303-305 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000209
  11. Kang JH, Lim JS, Kim JH, Hyung WJ, Chung YE, Choi JY, et al. Role of EUS and MDCT in the diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors according to the revised pathologic concept of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Eur Radiol 2009;19:924-934 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1224-2
  12. Kim HC, Lee JM, Choi SH, Han H, Kim SS, Lee SH, et al. Cystic changes in intraabdominal extrahepatic metastases from gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with imatinib. Korean J Radiol 2004;5:157-163 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2004.5.3.157
  13. Breiman RS, Beck JW, Korobkin M, Glenny R, Akwari OE, Heaston DK, et al. Volume determinations using computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;138:329-333 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.138.2.329
  14. Schwartz M. A biomathematical approach to clinical tumor growth. Cancer 1961;14:1272-1294 https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196111/12)14:6<1272::AID-CNCR2820140618>3.0.CO;2-H
  15. Tateishi U, Hasegawa T, Satake M, Moriyama N. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Correlation of computed tomography findings with tumor grade and mortality. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:792-798 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-200309000-00018
  16. Kim HC, Lee JM, Kim KW, Park SH, Kim SH, Lee JY, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: CT findings and prediction of malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:893-898 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.183.4.1830893
  17. Bertuccio P, Chatenoud L, Levi F, Praud D, Ferlay J, Negri E, et al. Recent patterns in gastric cancer: a global overview. Int J Cancer 2009;125:666-673 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24290
  18. Trupiano JK, Stewart RE, Misick C, Appelman HD, Goldblum JR. Gastric stromal tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 77 cases with correlation of features with nonaggressive and aggressive clinical behaviors. Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:705- 714 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200206000-00003
  19. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, Gorstein F, Lasota J, Longley BJ, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002;33:459-465 https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.123545
  20. Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, H L Sobin L, Lasota J. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol 2002;33:478-483 https://doi.org/10.1053/hupa.2002.124123
  21. Blay JY, Bonvalot S, Casali P, Choi H, Debiec-Richter M, Dei Tos AP, et al. Consensus meeting for the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Report of the GIST Consensus Conference of 20-21 March 2004, under the auspices of ESMO. Ann Oncol 2005;16:566-578 https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdi127
  22. Franquemont DW. Differentiation and risk assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 1995;103:41-47
  23. Hornick JL, Fletcher CD. The role of KIT in the management of patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Hum Pathol 2007;38:679-687 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2007.03.001
  24. Keun Park C, Lee EJ, Kim M, Lim HY, Choi DI, Noh JH, et al. Prognostic stratification of high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the era of targeted therapy. Ann Surg 2008;247:1011-1018 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181724f9d
  25. Binstock AJ, Johnson CD, Stephens DH, Lloyd RV, Fletcher JG. Carcinoid tumors of the stomach: a clinical and radiographic study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:947-951 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.176.4.1760947
  26. Yan SL, Yeh YH, Chen CH, Yang CC, Kuo CL, Wu HS. Gastric glomus tumor: a hypervascular submucosal tumor on power Doppler endosonography. J Clin Ultrasound 2007;35:164-168 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20284
  27. Daimaru Y, Kido H, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Benign schwannoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 1988;19:257- 264 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(88)80518-5
  28. Sarlomo-Rikala M, Miettinen M. Gastric schwannoma--a clinicopathological analysis of six cases. Histopathology 1995;27:355-360 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1995.tb01526.x
  29. Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Matsui N, Oya M, Akinaga R, Kubokawa M, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:2077-2082
  30. Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Y, Hirooka Y, Ohmiya N, Nagasaka T, et al. The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:37-43 https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.120323
  31. Kumar AJ, Kuhajda FP, Martinez CR, Fishman EK, Jezic DV, Siegelman SS. Computed tomography of extracranial nerve sheath tumors with pathological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1983;7:857-865 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-198310000-00020
  32. Cohen LM, Schwartz AM, Rockoff SD. Benign schwannomas: pathologic basis for CT inhomogeneities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:141-143 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.147.1.141
  33. Rha SE, Byun JY, Jung SE, Chun HJ, Lee HG, Lee JM. Neurogenic tumors in the abdomen: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics 2003;23:29-43 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.231025050
  34. Kwon MS, Lee SS, Ahn GH. Schwannomas of the gastrointestinal tract: clinicopathological features of 12 cases including a case of esophageal tumor compared with those of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Pathol Res Pract 2002;198:605-613 https://doi.org/10.1078/0344-0338-00309
  35. Prevot S, Bienvenu L, Vaillant JC, de Saint-Maur PP. Benign schwannoma of the digestive tract: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of five cases, including a case of esophageal tumor. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:431-436 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199904000-00007

Cited by

  1. Surgical Treatment of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor vol.13, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.1.3
  2. Plexiform Angiomyxoid Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Stomach: Report of a Case and Review of the Literature vol.70, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2014.70.1.47
  3. MRI features of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. vol.203, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.11667
  4. Giant retroperitoneal ancient schwannoma: Is preoperative biopsy always mandatory? vol.6, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2014.08.015
  5. Endoscopic Ultrasonographic Characteristics of Gastric Schwannoma Distinguished from Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor vol.65, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2015.65.1.21
  6. Benign Gastric Schwannoma: How Long Should We Follow Up to Monitor the Recurrence? A Case Report and Comprehensive Review of Literature of 137 Cases vol.100, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9738/intsurg-d-14-00106.1
  7. Isolated Colonic Schwannoma in the Ascending Colon: A Case Report and Literature Review of Schwannomas in the Large Intestine vol.72, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2015.72.5.358
  8. Gastric schwannoma: CT findings and clinicopathologic correlation vol.40, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0260-4
  9. Clinical implications of doubling time of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors vol.22, pp.45, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i45.10015
  10. CT Features of Colorectal Schwannomas: Differentiation from Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors vol.11, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166377
  11. Gastric Schwannoma: A Tumor Must Be Included in Differential Diagnoses of Gastric Submucosal Tumors vol.2017, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9615359
  12. Differentiation between gastrointestinal schwannomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors by computed tomography vol.13, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.5955
  13. Pharmacometric Modeling of Liver Metastases' Diameter, Volume, and Density and Their Relation to Clinical Outcome in Imatinib‐Treated Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors vol.6, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12195
  14. Abdominal schwannomas: review of imaging findings and pathology vol.42, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1088-5
  15. Gastric schwannoma: report of two cases and review of the literature vol.53, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.10.062
  16. Gastric Schwannoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature for Gastric Submucosal Masses Distinction vol.2018, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1230285
  17. Laparoscopic Resection of Appendiceal Schwannoma vol.2018, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9191503
  18. Large retroperitoneal schwannoma: a rare cause of chronic back pain vol.46, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518776474
  19. Peritumoral lymphoid cuff correlates well with lymph node enlargement in gastrointestinal schwannomas vol.9, pp.16, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24476
  20. Evaluation of computed tomography vascular reconstruction for the localization diagnosis of perigastric mass vol.97, pp.26, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000011177
  21. Malignant jejunal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with history of prostate cancer : A case report vol.98, pp.18, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000015332
  22. Computed tomographic characteristics of gastric schwannoma vol.47, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519833539
  23. Gastric sub-epithelial tumors: identification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using CT with a practical scoring method vol.22, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-00908-6
  24. Simple Analysis of the Computed Tomography Features of Gastric Schwannoma vol.70, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2018.09.002
  25. CT Versus Endoscopic Ultrasound for Differentiating Small (2-5 cm) Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors From Leiomyomas vol.213, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.20877
  26. Gastric Glomus Tumor vol.26, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/njs.njs_8_19
  27. Gastric schwannoma with high accumulation on fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography resected by non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery vol.13, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-019-01014-5
  28. Multiparametric MRI and 18F-FDG PET features for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors from benign gastric subepithelial lesions vol.30, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06534-9
  29. Difference of computed tomographic characteristic findings between gastric and intestinal gastrointestinal stromal tumors vol.38, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-00962-0
  30. New advances in radiomics of gastrointestinal stromal tumors vol.26, pp.32, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i32.4729
  31. What About Gastric Schwannoma? A Review Article vol.52, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-020-00456-2