DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differentiation between Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Extraforaminal Stenosis in Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra: Role of Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Lumbosacral Radiculography

  • Byun, Woo-Mok (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Woon (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kyo (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
  • Published : 2012.08.01

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role of lumbosacral radiculography using 3-dimentional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) rendering for diagnostic information of symptomatic extraforaminal stenosis in lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 18 patients with symptomatic (n = 10) and asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis (n = 8) in lumbosacral transitional vertebra. Each patient underwent 3D coronal fast-field echo sequences with selective water excitation using the principles of the selective excitation technique (Proset imaging). Morphologic changes of the L5 nerve roots at the symptomatic and asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis were evaluated on 3D MR rendered images of the lumbosacral spine. Results: Ten cases with symptomatic extraforaminal stenosis showed hyperplasia and degenerative osteophytes of the sacral ala and/or osteophytes at the lateral margin of the L5 body. On 3D MR lumbosacral radiculography, indentation of the L5 nerve roots was found in two cases, while swelling of the nerve roots was seen in eight cases at the exiting nerve root. Eight cases with asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis showed hyperplasia and degenerative osteophytes of the sacral ala and/or osteophytes at the lateral margin of the L5 body. Based on 3D MR lumbosacral radiculography, indentation or swelling of the L5 nerve roots was not found in any cases with asymptomatic extraforaminal stenosis. Conclusion: Results from 3D MR lumbosacral radiculography Indicate the indentation or swelling of the L5 nerve root in symptomatic extraforaminal stenosis. Based on these findings, 3D MR radiculography may be helpful in the diagnosis of the symptomatic extraforaminal stenosis with lumbosacral transitional vertebra.

Keywords

References

  1. Bron JL, van Royen BJ, Wuisman PI. The clinical significance of lumbosacral transitional anomalies. Acta Orthop Belg 2007;73:687-695
  2. O'Driscoll CM, Irwin A, Saifuddin A. Variations in morphology of the lumbosacral junction on sagittal MRI: correlation with plain radiography. Skeletal Radiol 1996;25:225-230 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002560050069
  3. Elster AD. Bertolotti's syndrome revisited. Transitional vertebrae of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989;14:1373-1377 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198912000-00015
  4. Quinlan JF, Duke D, Eustace S. Bertolotti's syndrome. A cause of back pain in young people. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:1183-1186 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02916
  5. Wiltse LL, Guyer RD, Spencer CW, Glenn WV, Porter IS. Alar transverse process impingement of the L5 spinal nerve: the far-out syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:31-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198401000-00008
  6. Abe E, Sato K, Shimada Y, Okada K, Yan K, Mizutani Y. Anterior decompression of foraminal stenosis below a lumbosacral transitional vertebra. A case report. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997;22:823-826 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199704010-00023
  7. Hashimoto M, Watanabe O, Hirano H. Extraforaminal stenosis in the lumbosacral spine. Efficacy of MR imaging in the coronal plane. Acta Radiol 1996;37:610-613 https://doi.org/10.3109/02841859609177684
  8. Moon KH, Jang JS, Lee SH, Lee SC, Lee HY. The role of computed tomography in the presurgical diagnosis of foraminal entrapment of lumbosacral junction. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2010;47:1-6 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.47.1.1
  9. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:403-408
  10. Deyo RA, Ciol MA, Cherkin DC, Loeser JD, Bigos SJ. Lumbar spinal fusion. A cohort study of complications, reoperations, and resource use in the Medicare population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993;18:1463-1470
  11. Nakao S, Yoshida M, Yamada H, Hashizume H. A new 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging method to diagnose extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:e47-e52 https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181cdd262
  12. Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:493-495 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014
  13. Transfeldt EE, Robertson D, Bradford DS. Ligaments of the lumbosacral spine and their role in possible extraforaminal spinal nerve entrapment and tethering. J Spinal Disord 1993;6:507-512 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199306060-00006
  14. Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC. Evidence from cadavers suggestive of entrapment of fifth lumbar spinal nerves by lumbosacral ligaments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991;16:336-347 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199103000-00014
  15. Nathan H, Weizenbluth M, Halperin N. The lumbosacral ligament (LSL), with special emphasis on the "lumbosacral tunnel" and the entrapment of the 5th lumbar nerve. Int Orthop 1982;6:197-202 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00267730
  16. Otani K, Konno S, Kikuchi S. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and nerve-root symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001;83:1137-1140 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.83B8.11736
  17. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Nojiri K, Ishikawa M, Toyama Y, Nishikawa Y. Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine: anatomic study and a report of four cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:E169-E173 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200203150-00020

Cited by

  1. Usefulness of the ProSet MRI for Diagnosis of the Extraforaminal Disc Herniation vol.20, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2013.20.1.28
  2. Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae? vol.15, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258
  3. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra and S1 radiculopathy: the value of coronal MR imaging vol.56, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1361-z
  4. Approach to the pediatric athlete with back pain: more than just the pars vol.43, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2015.1093668
  5. Far caudally migrated extraforaminal lumbosacral disc herniation treated by a microsurgical lateral extraforaminal transmuscular approach: case report vol.24, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.7.spine15342
  6. The Impact of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae on Therapeutic Outcomes of Transforaminal Epidural Injection in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation vol.16, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12315
  7. Investigation of the Effect of Cervical Radiculopathy on Peripheral Nerves of the Upper Extremity With High-Resolution Ultrasonography vol.43, pp.14, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000002539