The Korean Journal of Medicine

  • 제82권5호
  • /
  • Pages.569-575
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1738-9364(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0769(eISSN)
대한내과학회 (The Korean Association of Internal Medicine)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중년 한국인에서 사회경제적 수준과 대사증후군의 성별에 따른 연관성

Gender Differences in the Association of Socioeconomic Status with Metabolic Syndrome in Middle-Aged Koreans

  • 강혜미 (인제대학교 의과대학 일산백병원 내과) ;
  • 김동준 (인제대학교 의과대학 일산백병원 내과)
  • Kang, Hye-Mi (Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Jun (Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2012.05.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 대사 증후군과 사회경제적 수준의 관계는 사회 배경과 문화에 따라 달라질 수 있다. 우리는 중년 한국인에서 사회 경제적 수준과 대사 증후군의 관계에 있어 성별의 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 방법: 2005년 국민건강영양조사에 참여한 3,291명의 중년 성인을 대상으로 하였으며, 사회경제적 수준은 교육 정도에 따라 무학 또는 초졸, 중졸, 고졸, 대졸로 분류하였다. 결과: 남성에서 대사 증후군의 유병률은 34.5%였으며, 여성에서는 29.8%였다. 연령을 보정한 후에 여성에서는 학력이 높을수록 대사 증후군의 유병률이 낮았다(무학 또는 초졸, mean ${\pm}$ SEM, 35.5 ${\pm}$ 2.3%; 중졸, 37.3 ${\pm}$ 2.4; 고졸, 26.0 ${\pm}$ 1.8; 대졸, 21.5 ${\pm}$ 2.6; p for trend < 0.001). 그러나 남성에서는 학력에 따른 대사 증후군의 유병률에 차이가 없었다. 이러한 결과는 흡연, 음주, 운동, 식이로 설명되지 않았다. 결론: 한국 중년 여성에서는 사회경제적 수준과 대사 증후군이 밀접한 연관성을 보였으나, 남성에서는 연관성이 나타나지 않았다.

Background/Aims: The association of socioeconomic status with metabolic syndrome could differ according to cultural and social background. This study examined the potential influence of gender. Methods: A total of 3,291 middle-aged Korean subjects who participated in the 2005 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included. Socioeconomic status was measured using educational background (no school or graduated elementary school, and graduated middle school, high school, or college). Results: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 34.5% in men and 29.8% in women. After adjusting for age, women with more education had a lower prevalence (no school or graduated elementary school, mean ${\pm}$ SEM, 35.5 ${\pm}$ 2.3%; middle school, 37.3 ${\pm}$ 2.4; high school, 26.0 ${\pm}$ 1.8; college, 21.5 ${\pm}$ 2.6; p for trend < 0.001). In contrast, in men, there was no difference in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to educational background. This result could not be explained by smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, or diet. Conclusions: The data suggest that socioeconomic status is closely related to the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Korean middle-aged women, but not in men.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 2005;365:1415-1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66378-7
  2. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:1113-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.034
  3. Tota-Maharaj R, Defilippis AP, Blumenthal RS, Blaha MJ. A practical approach to the metabolic syndrome: review of current concepts and management. Curr Opin Cardiol 2010;25:502-512.
  4. Bruce KD, Byrne CD. The metabolic syndrome: common origins of a multifactorial disorder. Postgrad Med J 2009;85:614-621. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2008.078014
  5. Wamala SP, Lynch J, Horsten M, Mittleman MA, Schenck-Gustafsson K, Orth-Gomer K. Education and the metabolic syndrome in women. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1999-2003. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.12.1999
  6. Hidvegi T, Hetyesi K, Biro L, Jermendy G. Education level and clustering of clinical characteristics of metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2001;24:2013-2015. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.24.11.2013
  7. Silventoinen K, Pankow J, Jousilahti P, Hu G, Tuomilehto J. Educational inequalities in the metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease among middle-aged men and women. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:327-334. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi007
  8. Dallongeville J, Cottel D, Ferrieres J, et al. Household income is associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome in a sex-specific manner. Diabetes Care 2005;28:409-415. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.2.409
  9. Loucks EB, Rehkopf DH, Thurston RC, Kawachi I. Socioeconomic disparities in metabolic syndrome differ by gender: evidence from NHANES III. Ann Epidemiol 2007;17:19-26.
  10. Loucks EB, Magnusson KT, Cook S, Rehkopf DH, Ford ES, Berkman LF. Socioeconomic position and the metabolic syndrome in early, middle, and late life: evidence from NHANES 1999-2002. Ann Epidemiol 2007;17:782-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.05.003
  11. Zuo H, Shi Z, Hu X, Wu M, Guo Z, Hussain A. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and factors associated with its components in Chinese adults. Metabolism 2009;58:1102-1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2009.04.008
  12. Paek KW, Chun KH, Jin KN, Lee KS. Do health behaviors moderate the effect of socioeconomic status on metabolic syndrome? Ann Epidemiol 2006;16:756-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.04.012
  13. Monteiro CA, Moura EC, Conde WL, Popkin BM. Socioeconomic status and obesity in adult populations of developing countries: a review. Bull World Health Organ 2004;82:940-946.
  14. Kim S, Symons M, Popkin BM. Contrasting socioeconomic profiles related to healthier lifestyles in China and the United States. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:184-191. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh006
  15. Kim MH, Kim MK, Choi BY, Shin YJ. Educational disparities in the metabolic syndrome in a rapidly changing society: the case of South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:1266-1273. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi175
  16. Park HS, Oh SW, Cho SI, Choi WH, Kim YS. The metabolic syndrome and associated lifestyle factors among South Korean adults. Int J Epidemiol 2004;33:328-336. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh032
  17. Park MJ, Yun KE, Lee GE, Cho HJ, Park HS. A crosssectional study of socioeconomic status and the metabolic syndrome in Korean adults. Ann Epidemiol 2007;17:320-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.10.007
  18. Lee WY, Jung CH, Park JS, Rhee EJ, Kim SW. Effects of smoking, alcohol, exercise, education, and family history on the metabolic syndrome as defined by the ATP III. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005;67:70-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2004.05.006
  19. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001;285:2486-2497. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.19.2486
  20. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation 2009;120:1640-1645. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644
  21. Scuteri A, Vuga M, Najjar SS, et al. Education eclipses ethnicity in predicting the development of the metabolic syndrome in different ethnic groups in midlife: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Diabet Med 2008;25:1390-1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02596.x
  22. Brunner EJ, Hemingway H, Walker BR, et al. Adrenocortical, autonomic, and inflammatory causes of the metabolic syndrome: nested case-control study. Circulation 2002;106:2659-2665. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000038364.26310.BD
  23. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Kaplan J. Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation 1999;99:2192-2217. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.99.16.2192
  24. Steptoe A, Kunz-Ebrecht S, Owen N, et al. Socioeconomic status and stress-related biological responses over the working day. Psychosom Med 2003;65:461-470. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PSY.0000035717.78650.A1
  25. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG. A longitudinal study of job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: results from a three-year follow-up. Psychosom Med 1998;60:697-706. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199811000-00007
  26. Yoon YS, Oh SW, Park HS. Socioeconomic status in relation to obesity and abdominal obesity in Korean adults: a focus on sex differences. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2006;14: 909-919. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2006.105

피인용 문헌

  1. 우유 섭취와 대사증후군의 관련성 - 2007~2010년 국민건강영양조사 자료를 이용하여 vol.17, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2012.17.6.795
  2. 제 5기 국민건강영양조사로 추정한 한국 성인의 대사증후군 유병률과 관련 요인 vol.38, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5393/jamch.2013.38.1.001
  3. 노인의 대사증후군 유병에 따른 영양소 섭취 특성 - 국민건강영양조사 제5기 1차년도(2010) 자료를 이용하여 - vol.26, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2013.26.3.515
  4. 제2형 당뇨병 환자의 혈당 비조절 관련 요인분석: 국민건강영양조사(2010-2012) 자료이용 vol.26, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2016.26.2.125
  5. The Health Behavior and Status according to Household Income Level in Korean Women Aged 35 Years or Older: the 2013 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey vol.17, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.1.20
  6. 폐경 전 전업주부의 대사증후군 관련 요인: 2010~2015년 국민건강영양조사자료분석 vol.29, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2018.29.1.108
  7. 신장이식 수혜자의 대사증후군 발생 위험 관련 요인에 대한 융복합적 조사연구 vol.18, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2020.18.5.375
  8. Comparison of Blood Triglyceride Level by Health and Dietary Behaviors Using the Seventh (2018) Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) vol.31, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.17495/easdl.2021.10.31.5.299