DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the Quality of Frozen Skipjack Tuna Katsuwonus pelamis Thawed by Vacuum and Water Immersion

진공 해동과 침수 해동에 의한 냉동 가다랑어(Katsuwonus pelamis)의 품질 차이에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2012.11.20
  • Accepted : 2012.12.10
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

Thawing is very important in tuna canning because it affects the yield and quality of the canned tuna, and productivity. The effects of vacuum thawing on the quality, yield, and thawing times of frozen skipjack were compared with conventional water immersion thawing. The time required to thaw frozen skipjack tuna (weight 2.5-3.0 kg) from $-10^{\circ}C$ to $-2^{\circ}C$ was 75, 60, and 37 min at a pressure of 17, 23, and 31 mmHg, respectively, corresponding to temperatures of 20, 25, and $30^{\circ}C$. The thawing time decreased with increasing pressure. Vacuum thawing shorten the thawing time by 58-80% compared with water immersion thawing at $20^{\circ}C$, and there was less difference between the core and skin temperatures than with water immersion thawing. No significant change in pH or histamine was observed according to thawing method, while the volatile basic nitrogen (VBN), trimethylamine (TMA), and K value were lower with vacuum thawing than water immersion thawing. Based on these results, we believe that vacuum thawing minimizes the biochemical and microbial changes that occur while thawing frozen skipjack tuna.

Keywords

References

  1. Altringham T and Block B. 1997. Why do tuna maintain elevated slow muscle temperature? Power output of muscle temperature? Power output of muscle temperature isolated from endothermic and ectothermic fish. J Exp Bio 200, 2617-2627.
  2. AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC., USA, 69-74.
  3. Brown WD, Finch R, Kwon TW, Olcott HS and Schaefer MB. 1967. Relation of quality of canned yellowfi n tuna to length of fi sh, time of holding on deck, frozen storage aboard vessel, and biochemical variables. Fishery Ind Res 4, 1-21
  4. Crawford L, Irwin EJ, Spinelli J and Brown WD. 1970. Premortem stress and postmortem biochemical changes in skipjack tuna and their relation to quality of the canned product. J Food Sci 35, 849-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1970.tb02010.x
  5. Crepey JR and Han-Ching L. 1979. Progress in thawing of seafoods. Quality of thawed products. Peche Maritime 58, 747-751.
  6. Everington DW. 1971. Thawing of frozen foodstuffs. Chemistry and Industry, 973-978.
  7. Hashimoto Y and Okaichi T. 1957. On the determination of TMA and TMAO. A modifi cation of dyer method. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 23, 269-272. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.23.269
  8. Jason AC. 2001. Thawing frozen fish. Torry advisory note No. 25, Torry Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.
  9. KFDA (Korea Food and Drug Administration). 2012. In: Food code. KFDA, Seoul, Korea. 10-1-13 and 5-11-1.
  10. Kim DK, Park IS and Im NS. 1998. Determination of chemical freshness indices for chilled and frozen fish. Korean J Food Sci Technol 30, 993-999.
  11. Kim SG, Park YS, Choi HG, Lee JH and Kim KK. 2003. A study on the combined equipment for the pre-cooling and the thawing using the low temperature vacuum system. J Kor Soc Mar Eng 27, 280-288.
  12. Kose S and Hall G. 2000. Modifi cation of a colorimetric method for histamine analysis in fish meal. Food Res Int 33, 839-845. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00103-4
  13. Zhang J, Farkas BE and Hale SA. 2001. Thermal properties of skipjack tuna. Int J Food Prop 41, 81-90.

Cited by

  1. Effects of Vacuum Cooling Followed by Water Spraying on the Quality of Precooked Skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis vol.47, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2014.0012