DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Pesticide Residues on Perilla Leaf by Nozzle Types of Knapsack Sprayers

배부식 분무기 노즐이 들깻잎의 농약잔류에 미치는 영향

  • Son, Kyeong-Ae (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kang, Tae Kyeong (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, Byeong Jun (Internaitonal Technology Cooperation Center, RDA) ;
  • Jin, Yong-Duk (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Gil, Geun-Hwan (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Chan Sub (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Jin Bae (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Im, Geon-Jae (National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Key-Woon (Applied Biology and Chemistry Division, Kyungpook National University)
  • 손경애 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 강태경 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 박병준 (농촌진흥청 국제협력과) ;
  • 진용덕 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 길근환 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김찬섭 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 김진배 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 임건재 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 이기운 (경북대학교 농업생명과학대학)
  • Received : 2012.10.05
  • Accepted : 2012.11.14
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

This study was carried out to clarify the effects of the application of pesticide by different spray nozzle types on pesticide residues. The average droplet size and discharge rate were investigated when the manual compressed sprayer with two head disk type nozzle and the knapsack engine powered sprayer with two head fan shape nozzles were used. The fan type nozzles were classified into three types by the number of orifice in the nozzle. Three type nozzles tested were fan with one orifice, fan with two orifices and fan with three orifices. Fan (trade name : D-3) with 2.4 L/min. of the discharge rate and $76{\mu}m$ of the average droplet size while maintaining constant pressure $1.1{\pm}0.2$ MPa, and fan D-35 with 2.6 L/min. and $90{\mu}m$ while maintaining constant pressure $1.0{\pm}0.2$ MPa were appropriate. The orifice size of D-3 was 0.65 mm length ${\times}$ 0.45 mm width and the orifice size of D-35 was 0.62 mm length ${\times}$ 0.46 mm width. The residue levels of imidacloprid on perilla leaves among four applications by four different nozzles show significantly difference with 5% significance level. The residue levels $3.76{\sim}3.92mg\;kg^{-1}$ by fan or disk type is smaller than $4.52{\sim}4.92mg\;kg^{-1}$ by fan II or fan III. The residue levels of imidacloprid on perilla leaf were different depend on the spray nozzles type.

본 실험은 배부식 분무기 노즐 종류를 달리하여 농약을 살포하였을 경우 작물 중 농약잔류량에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위해 수행하였다. 배부식 인력분무기의 2구 디스크형 노즐과 배부식 동력분무기의 2구 선형노즐을 분구형상에 따라 I형은 분구가 하나, II형은 분구가 둘, III형은 분구가 셋으로 3가지 유형으로 구분하여 분무입경과 시간당 분무량을 조사하였다. 선형노즐 II형(상표명: D-3)이 압력 $1.1{\pm}0.2$ MPa에서 분무입경 $76{\mu}m$, 단위 시간당 약제 살포량 2.4 L/min.으로, 선형노즐 II형 (상표명: D-35)가 압력 $1.0{\pm}0.2$ MPa에서 분무입경 $90{\mu}m$, 단위 시간당 약제 살포량 2.6 L/min.으로 적정하다고 판단되었다. D-3의 분구 크기는 0.65 mm length ${\times}$ 0.45 mm width이고 D-35의 분구 크기는 0.62 mm length ${\times}$ 0.46 mm width 이였다. 들깻잎을 대상으로 노즐별 imidacloprid의 잔류량 차이를 비교하여 유의수준 5%에서 잔류량의 차이가 있었다. 디스크형 노즐과 선형노즐 I형이 $3.76{\sim}3.92mg\;kg^{-1}$으로 선형노즐 II형과 III형의 $4.52{\sim}4.92mg\;kg^{-1}$보다 잔류량이 적었다. 분무 노즐을 달리하여 농약살포시 들깻잎 중 잔류량의 차이가 있다고 판단되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Basi, S., M. Hunsche, L. Damerow, P. S. Lammers and G. Noga (2012) Evaluation of a pneumatic drop-on-demand generator for application of agrochemical solutions. Crop Protection. 40:121-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.04.011
  2. Cho, M. R., H. Y. Jeon and S. Y. Na (2000) Occurrence of Frankliniella occidentalis and Tereanychus urticae in rose greenhouse and effectiveness of different control methods. Journal of Bio-Environment Control. 9:179-184.
  3. Eun, S-W. (2011) Characteristics of pesticide residues in Paprika by different application methods. Kyungpook National University.
  4. Holland, J. H., P. C. Jepson, E. C. Jones and C. Turner (1997) A comparison of spinning disc atomisers and flat fan pressure nozzles in terms of pesticide deposition and biological efficacy within cereal crops. Crop protection. 16:179-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(96)00071-3
  5. Kang, T.-G. (2004) Development of electrostatic spraying system for orchard sprayer. Chungbuk National University.
  6. Law, S. E. (2001) Agricultural electrostatic spray application: a review of significant research and development during the 20th century. Journal of Electrostatics. 51-52:25-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3886(01)00040-7
  7. Maclachlan, D. J. and D. Hamilton (2009) A new tool for the evaluation of crop residue trial data (day-zero-plus decline). Food Additives and Contaminants. 1-18 iFirst.
  8. Poulsen, M. E., M. Wenneker, J. Withagen and H. B. Christensen (2012) Pesticide residues in individual versus composite samples of apples after fine or coarse spray quality application. Crop protection. 35:5-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.12.013
  9. Sanchez-Hermosilla, J., J. V. Rincon, F. Paez and M. Fernandez (2012) Comparative spray deposits by manually pulled trolley sprayer and a spray gun in greenhouse tomato crops. Crop Protection. 31:119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2011.10.007
  10. Jeong, Y.-H., J.-E. Kim, J.-H. Kim, Y.-D. Lee, C.-H. Lim, J.-H. Hur (2004) The latest Pesticide Science (Revised). Sigma Press. p.87-95, p.154.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Pesticide Residue Amounts in Apple Trees Applied by Different Sprayers and Spray Volumes vol.20, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2016.20.3.264
  2. 파프리카 시설재배지에서 약제 살포방법에 의한 해충방제 효과와 최적 살포함량 vol.18, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2014.18.4.350
  3. Drift Patterns of Aerial Spraying Pesticide Caused by Formulations and Nozzles vol.24, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2020.24.3.278
  4. 과수원 내 다목적 살포에 적합한 이류체 노즐 개발에 관한 연구 vol.17, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7839/ksfc.2020.17.4.001