Journal of the Korean housing association (한국주거학회논문집)

The Korean Housing Association (한국주거학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Origins and Characteristics of Korean Apartments in 1970-80's - Comparison with Ideas of Le Corbusier, Siedlung and Hilberseimer -

1970-80년대 한국 고층 아파트의 기원과 성격에 관한 연구 - 르 꼬르뷰제, 지들룽, 힐벨자이머의 고층도시 이론과의 비교 -

  • 이상헌 (건국대학교 건축전문대학원)
  • Received : 2011.11.25
  • Accepted : 2012.02.07
  • Published : 2012.02.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the theoretical origins and characteristics of Korean Apartment that became a dominant housing type of Korea by comparing it with the ideas of Le Corbusier, Siedlung and Hilberseimer. Korean apartment is different from Corbusier's idea in that it has no vision for new community in modern society. Formal typology of apartment also differs from Corbusier's unite which embodied a new collective way of living in modern society. In that Korean apartment was introduced as a means to provide houses to urban worker and to solve the housing shortage, it was close to the idea of Siedlung. However, unlike Siedlung Korean apartment was based on urban ideology and not a social housing. In terms of it's repetitive form, Korean Apartment resembled Hilberseimer's proposal for capitalistic metropolis. However, it differs from Korean Apartment in that the latter has no utopian vision of new order So, while reflecting fragmented ideas of modern utopia, Korean apartment is architecture without utopia.

Keywords

References

  1. 강부성 외 (1999). 한국공동주택의 역사. 서울: 세진사.
  2. 박해천 (2011). 콘크리트 유토피아. 서울: 자음과 모음.
  3. 박철수 (2006). 아파트의 문화사. 서울: 살림.
  4. 발레리 줄레조 (2007). 아파트 공화국. 서울: 후마니타스.
  5. 손세관 (2000). 도시주거형성의 역사. 서울: 열화당.
  6. 손정목 (2003). 서울도시계획이야기 6권. 서울: 한울.
  7. 장림종 (2009). 대한민국아파트 발굴사 (종암에서 힐탐까지 1세대 아파트 탐사의 기록). 서울: 효형출판.
  8. 전남일 (2010). 한국 주거의 공간사. 파주: 돌베게.
  9. 전남일 외 (2005). 한국주거의 사회사. 파주: 돌베게.
  10. 전상인 (2009). 아파트에 미치다, 현대한국의 주거사회학. 서울: 이숲.
  11. Hall, P. (1988). Cities of Tomorrow. Blackwell.
  12. Hays, M. (1992). Modernism and Post Humanist Subject. the MIT press.
  13. Jung, I. (1996). The study on the urban development of Yoido. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 12(2), 123-134.
  14. Le Corbusier (1924). The City of Tomorrow. The MIT Press.
  15. Lee, J. (1996). An analysis of clarence a Perry's neighborhood unit. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 12(5), 99-109.
  16. Lee, J. (1995). A study on the expression of the modernity in the medium-rise multi family housing in 1960's. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 11(6), 23-32.
  17. Lee, O. (2006). The characteristics and problems of gangnam area's development process in Seoul. Journal of Urban geology, 9(1), 15-32.
  18. Mumford, E. (2000). The CIAM Discourse on Urbanism, 1928-1960. The MIT Press,
  19. Park, J. et al. (2005). A study on the hillside affordable housing of Seoul in the late 1960s through early 1970s. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 21(12), 47-54.
  20. Passanti, F. (1987). The skyscrapers of the ville contemporaine. Assemblage 4, 21(12), 47-54.
  21. Space (1968). Seoul.
  22. Tafuri, M. (1980). Modern Architecture. The MIT press.
  23. Tafuri, M. (1976). Architecture and Utopia. The MIT press.
  24. Youn, E., & Jung, I. (2009). A study on the formation of urban space in Gangnam area and the urban discourse in the 1960's. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea 25(5), 231-238.
  25. Zchang, S. (1994). A study on the transition of the 60-70's apartment house in Korea. Ph. D Dissertation, Seoul National University. Seoul.