융합보안논문지 (Convergence Security Journal)

  • 제12권6호
  • /
  • Pages.51-59
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1598-7329(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-7460(eISSN)
한국융합보안학회 (Korea convergence Security Association)
권호 표지

IT교육에서 분산인지를 지원하는 학습몰입모형

A Learning-Flow Model Supporting Distributed Cognition in IT Education

  • 투고 : 20120000
  • 심사 : 20120000
  • 발행 : 2012.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서 제안하는 학습몰입모형 "BoX" 는 B-Boy들이 대회에서 우승하기 위해 분산인지(distributed cognition) 경쟁을 능동적으로 즐기는 문화에서 그 발상의 기초를 두고 있다. "Battle"은 경쟁을 의미하며 X는 본 연구에서 제안하려는 교수법 적용과목이다. 본 논문의 목적은 학습자가 높은 수준의 학습몰입 상태에서 창조적 문제해결능력을 배양하는 학습모형을 제시하는 것이다. "BoX" 구현의 핵심은 개인인지부하를 줄이는 분산인지 활동을 극대화하도록 학습자간의 경쟁질서와 통제원리를 설계하는 것이다. 두 학기의 IT교육과정에서 비교학생군의 학습 성취도를 분석한 결과, "BoX" 학습모형이 기존의 수업방식에 비해서 학습몰입도와 학습 성취도를 크게 높이는 것을 확인하였다.

This paper presents a new learning model, "BoX(Battle of X)", which is based on a concept from the culture of B-Boys who enjoy the race of "distributed cognition" to win in their contests. The "battle" means a contest and "X" means a course to which our learning model can be applied. The goal of this paper is to present a learning model that allow students to be in a state of learning-flow and provides them with the ability of creative problem solving simultaneously. The key of the "BoX" implementation is to design a principle that controls contests between students to maximize distributed cognitive activities for reducing individual's cognitive load. This paper also presents how-to of "BoX" implementation and its effects. Through the analysis on learning achievement of students during one year course of IT education, we have confirmed that the "BoX" model provides students with higher learning achievement and learning-flow level in comparison with traditional learning model.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 민상기, 나승일, 전문계 고등학교 학생의 학습몰입과 학급풍토의 관계, Journal of Agricultural Education and Human Resource Development, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 45-68, 2007. https://doi.org/10.23840/agehrd.2007.39.3.45
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Flow : The psychology of optimal experience, New York : Harper and Row, Co., 1990.
  3. Freeman, P.A, The experience of "flow" during challenge education activities for adults, Dotoral desertation. Indiana University, 1993.
  4. Tennant, M. & Pogson, P., Learning and Change in the Adult Years, 1995. 황원철, 홍기형, 이광원, 김성열, 김경희, 성미령(역), 성인학습과 삶의 변화, 경남대학교출판부, 1998.
  5. Wagner, M. M., Students' achievement and perception of the classroom environment in single-sex mathematics classes in one coeducational school, Dotoral desertation. University of California, 2002.
  6. Chandler, P., Sweller, J. Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction, Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293-332. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
  7. 김미영, 학습자의 사전지식, 인지부하, 몰입, 학습성취도 간의 관계 규명. 석사학위 논문. 서울: 이화여자 대학교, 2008.
  8. 김 경, 웹기반 학습에서 학습 자료 유형과 학습내용 제시 시기가 인지부하, 효과성 및 효율성에 미치는 효과. 교육공학연구, 2004.
  9. Carmen, M. B., Improving classroom climate, Eric Document Reproduction Service NO. ED396381, 1996.
  10. Vygotsky, L. S., Mind in society : The development of higher mental process, Cambridge, MA : Havard University Press, 1978. (Original work published in 1930, 1933, 1935).
  11. Collins, A., Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In Idol, L, & Jones, F. (Eds), Educational value and cognitive instruction : Implication for reform(pp. 121-138), Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991.
  12. Mark Perry, The application of individually and socially distributed cognition in workplace studies: two peas in a pod?, Proceedings of European Conference on Cognitive Science, Siena, Italy, p. 87-92. 1999.
  13. Johnson. D.W., et al., Structuring Cooperative Learning : Lesson Plan for Teacher. Edina.
  14. Bayard, B., Problem-based learning in dietetic education: A descriptive and evaluative case study and an analytical comparison with a lecture based method, Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1994.