DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Clinical and Pathological Factors Related to the Prognosis of Chinese Patients with Stage Ⅰb To Ⅱb Cervical Cancer

  • Xie, Xiu-Zhen (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) ;
  • Song, Kun (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) ;
  • Cui, Baoxia (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) ;
  • Jiang, Jie (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) ;
  • Zhang, You-Zhong (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) ;
  • Wang, Bo (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) ;
  • Yang, Xing-Sheng (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University) ;
  • Kong, Bei-Hua (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University)
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze the clinical and pathological factors related to the prognosis of Chinese patients with stage Ib to IIb cervical cancer. Methods and Results: 13 clinical pathological factors in 255 patients with stage Ib to IIb cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy were analyzed to screen for factors related to prognosis. The cumulative 5-year survival of the 255 patients was 75.7%. The result of the univariate analysis suggested that clinical stage, cell differentiation, depth of cervical stromal invasion, parametrial tissue involvement, and lymph node metastasis were prognostic factors for patients with stage Ib to IIb cervical cancer (P<0.05). Compared with cases with involvement of iliac nodes, obturator nodes, or inguinal lymph nodes, cases with metastasis to the common iliac lymph nodes had a poorer prognosis (P<0.05). Cases with involvement of four or more lymph nodes had a poorer prognosis than those with involvement of three or fewer lymph nodes (P<0.05). Using multivariate Cox proportional hazards model regression analysis, non-squamous histological type, poor differentiation, parametrial tissue involvement, and outer 1/3 stromal invasion were found to be independently related to patients poor prognosis (P<0.05). Conclusion: Non-squamous histological type, poor cell differentiation, parametrial tissue involvement, and outer 1/3 stromal invasion are the independent poor prognostic factors for patients with stage Ib to IIb cervical cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Chen J, Macdonald OK, Gaffney DK (2008). Incidence, mortality, and prognostic factors of small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol, 111, 1394-402. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173570b
  2. Creasman WT, Kohler MF (2004). Is lymph vascular space involvement an independent prognostic factor in early cervical cancer? Gynecol Oncol, 92, 525-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.020
  3. Farley JH, Hickey KW, Carlson JW, et al (2003). Adenosquamous histology predicts a poor outcome for patients with advanced-stage, but not early-stage, cervical carcinoma. Cancer, 97, 2196-202. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11371
  4. Fyles AW, Milosevic M, Pintilie M, et al (2000). Anemia, hypoxia and transfusion in patients with cervix cancer: a review. Radiother Oncol, 57, 13-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00245-0
  5. Gungor T, Altinkaya SO, Ozat M, et al (2011). Unusual form of superficial spreading squamous cell carcinoma of cervix involving the endometrium, bilateral tubes and ovaries: a case report with literature review. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 283, 323-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1672-1
  6. Hellebrekers BW, Zwinderman AH, Kenter GG, et al (2000). Surgical treatment of early stage cervical carcinoma at Leids University Medical Center, 1984-1996: depth of invasion, number and bilaterality of metastatic lymph nodes prognostic for recurrence. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, 144, 2304-9.
  7. Ho CM, Chien TY, Huang SH, et al (2004). Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol, 93, 458-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.026
  8. Horn LC, Fischer U, Raptis G, et al (2007). Tumor size is of prognostic value in surgically treated FIGO stage II cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 107, 310-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.06.026
  9. Kodaira T, Fuwa N, Toita T, et al (2003). Comparison of prognostic value of MRI and FIGO stage among patients with cervical carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys, 56, 769-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00007-5
  10. Marchal C, Rangeard L, Brunaud C (2005). Anemia impact on treatments of cervical carcinomas. Cancer Radiother, 9, 87-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canrad.2005.01.004
  11. Munagala R, Rai SN, Ganesharajah S, et al (2010). Clinicopathological, but not socio-demographic factors affect the prognosis in cervical carcinoma. Oncol Rep, 24, 511-20.
  12. Nguyen TL, Nguyen DC, Nguyen TH, et al (2011). Surveybased cancer mortality in the Lao PDR, 2007-08. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 2495-8.
  13. Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, et al (2010) Outcomes after radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage adenocarcinoma of uterine cervix. Br J Cancer, 102, 1692-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605705
  14. Plante M, Gregoire J, Renaud MC, et al (2011). The vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update of a series of 125 cases and 106 pregnancies. Gynecol Oncol, 121, 290-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.345
  15. Pointreau Y, Ruffier Loubire A, Denis F, et al (2010). Cervix cancer. Cancer Radiother, 14, S147-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1278-3218(10)70018-4
  16. Poka R, Juhasz B, Lampe L. Cervical cancer in young women: a poorer prognosis? Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 46, 33-7.
  17. Ruiz Ortz E, Gonzlez Lira G, Sebastin Mauricio R, et al (1995). Cervix carcinoma with endometrial and myometrial involvement. Report of a case. Ginecol Obstet Mex, 63, 23-5.
  18. Sakuragi N (2007). Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol, 12, 165-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-007-0661-2
  19. Srisomboon J, Kietpeerakool C, Suprasert P, et al (2011). Survival and prognostic factors comparing stage IB 1 versus stage IB 2 cervical cancer treated with primary radical hysterectomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 1753-6.
  20. Van den Tillaart SA, Trimbos JB, Dreef EJ, et al (2011). Patterns of parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens of cervical cancer patients. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 30, 185-92.
  21. Wright JD, Grigsby PW, Brooks R, et al (2007). Utility of parametrectomy for early stage cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer, 110, 1281-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22899

Cited by

  1. Statistical Modelling and Forecasting of Cervix Cancer Cases in Radiation Oncology Treatment: A Hospital Based Study from Western Nepal vol.14, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.3.2097
  2. Lack of any Impact of Histopathology Type on Prognosis in Patients with Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix vol.15, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.6.2815
  3. Significance of the Factors Associated With Parametrial Involvement in Stage IB to IIA Cervical Cancer vol.26, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000688
  4. Prognostic significance of number of nodes removed in patients with node-negative early cervical cancer vol.42, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.13058