DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Can Urinary Cotinine Predict Nicotine Dependence Level in Smokers?

  • Jung, Hyun-Suk (Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Yeol (Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Son, Jungsik (Department of Family Medicine, INHA International Medical Center) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Jee (Department of Family Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine) ;
  • Seo, Hong-Gwan (Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Park, So-Hee (The Korea Central Cancer Registry, National Cancer Center) ;
  • Huh, Bong Ryul (Center for Cancer Prevention and Detection, National Cancer Center)
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

Background: Although nicotine dependence plays a role as a main barrier for smoking cessation, there is still a lack of solid evidence on the validity of biomarkers to determine nicotine dependence in clinical settings. This study aimed to investigate whether urinary cotinine levels could reflect the severity of nicotine dependence in active smokers. Materials and Methods: Data regarding general characteristics and smoking status was collected using a self-administered smoking questionnaire. The Fagerstr$\ddot{o}$m test for nicotine dependence (FTND) was used to determine nicotine dependence of the participants, and a total of 381 participants were classified into 3 groups of nicotine dependence: low (n=205, 53.8%), moderate (n=127, 33.3%), and high dependence groups (n=49, 12.9%). Stepwise multiple linear regression model and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analyses were used to determine the validity of urinary cotinine for high nicotine dependence. Results: In correlation analysis, urinary cotinine levels increased with FTND score (r=0.567, P<0.001). ROC curves analysis showed that urinary cotinine levels predicted the high-dependence group with reasonable accuracy (optimal cut-off value=1,000 ng/mL; AUC=0.82; P<0.001; sensitivity=71.4%; specificity=74.4%). In stepwise multiple regression analysis, the total smoking period (${\beta}$=0.042, P=0.001) and urinary cotinine levels (${\beta}$=0.234, P<0.001) were positively associated with nicotine dependence, whereas an inverse association was observed between highest education levels (>16 years) and nicotine dependence (${\beta}$=-0.573, P=0.034). Conclusions: The results of this study support the validity of using urinary cotinine levels for assessment of nicotine dependence in active smokers.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker TB, Piper ME, McCarthy DE, et al (2007). Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: implications for nicotine dependence. Nicotine Tob Res, 9, 555-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200701673480
  2. Blackford AL, Yang G, Hernandez-Avila M, et al (2006). Cotinine concentration in smokers from different countries: relationship with amount smoked and cigarette type. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 15, 1799-804. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0427
  3. Breslau N, Fenn N, Peterson EL (1993). Early smoking initiation and nicotine dependence in a cohort of young adults. Drug Alcohol Depend, 33, 129-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-8716(93)90054-T
  4. Breslau N, Peterson EL (1996). Smoking cessation in young adults: age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences. Am J Public Hlth, 86, 214-20. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.86.2.214
  5. Caraballo RS, Giovino GA, Pechacek TF, et al (1998). Racial and ethnic differences in serum cotinine levels of cigarette smokers: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1991. JAMA, 280, 135-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.2.135
  6. Cheah YK, Naidu BM (2012). Exploring factors influencing smoking behaviour in Malaysia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 1125-30. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.4.1125
  7. de Weerd S, Thomas CM, Kuster JE, et al (2002). Variation of serum and urine cotinine in passive and active smokers and applicability in preconceptional smoking cessation counseling. Environ Res, 90, 119-24. https://doi.org/10.1006/enrs.2002.4395
  8. Dhavan P, Bassi S, Stigler MH, et al (2011). Using salivary cotinine to validate self-reports of tobacco use by Indian youth living in low-income neighborhoods. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 12, 2551-4.
  9. Fagerstrom K, Furberg H (2008). A comparison of the fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence and smoking prevalence across countries. Addiction, 103, 841-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02190.x
  10. Feng G, Jiang Y, Li Q, et al (2010). Individual-level factors associated with intentions to quit smoking among adult smokers in six cities of China: findings from the ITC China Survey. Tob Control, 19, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.037093
  11. Fu M, Martinez-Sanchez JM, Agudo A, et al (2012). Nicotine depedence and salivary cotinine concentration in daily smokers. Eur J Cancer Prev, 21, 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834a7e59
  12. Hagimoto A, Nakamura M, Morita T, et al (2010). Smoking cessation patterns and predictors of quitting smoking among the Japanese general population: a 1-year followup study. Addiction, 105, 164-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02735.x
  13. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, et al (1991). The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the fagerstrom tolerance questionnaire. Br J Addict, 86, 1119-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
  14. Jang SY, Kim JH, Lim MK, et al (2012). Relationship between BMI, body image, and smoking in Korean women as determined by urine cotinine: results of a nationwide survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 1003-10. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.3.1003
  15. Jarvis MJ, Tunstall-Pedoe H, Feyerabend C, et al (1987). Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Am J Public Hlth, 77, 1435-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.77.11.1435
  16. John U, Meyer C, Hapke U, et al (2003). The fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence in two adult population samplespotential influence of lifetime amount of tobacco smoked on the degree of dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend, 71, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00038-3
  17. Khuder SA, Dayal HH, Mutgi AB (1999). Age at smoking onset and its effect on smoking cessation. Addict Behav, 24, 673-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00113-0
  18. Kraft P, Svendsen T, Hauknes A (1998). Intention to stop smoking among Norwegian smokers: the role of nicotine dependence, type of cigarettes, and age at onset of daily smoking. Addict Behav, 23, 133-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(97)00021-X
  19. Law MR, Morris JK, Watt HC, et al (1997). The dose-response relationship between cigarette consumption, biochemical markers and risk of lung cancer. Br J Cancer, 75, 1690-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1997.287
  20. Lerman C, Orleans CT, Engstrom PF (1993). Biological markers in smoking cessation treatment. Semin Oncol, 20, 359-67.
  21. Molander L, Hansson A, Lunell E, et al (2000). Pharmacokinetics of nicotine in kidney failure. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 68, 250-60. https://doi.org/10.1067/mcp.2000.109006
  22. Muscat JE, Stellman SD, Caraballo RS, et al (2009). Time to first cigarette after waking predicts cotinine levels. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 18, 3415-20. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0737
  23. Oh IH, Yoon SJ, Yoon TY, et al (2012). Health and economic burden of major cancers due to smoking in Korea. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 13, 1525-31. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.4.1525
  24. Park SM, Son KY, Lee YJ, et al (2004). A preliminary investigation of early smoking initiation and nicotine dependence in Korean adults. Drug Alcohol Depend, 74, 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.01.001
  25. Payne TJ, Smith PO, McCracken LM, et al (1994). Assessing nicotine dependence: a comparison of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) with the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample. Addict Behav, 19, 307-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(94)90032-9
  26. Pomerleau CS, Carton SM, Lutzke ML, et al (1994). Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addict Behav, 19, 33-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(94)90049-3
  27. Shin HS, Kim JG, Shin YJ, et al (2002). Sensitive and simple method for the determination of nicotine and cotinine in human urine, plasma and saliva by gas chromatographymass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 769, 177-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00007-7
  28. Siahpush M, McNeill A, Borland R, et al (2006). Socioeconomic variations in nicotine dependence, selfefficacy, and intention to quit across four countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob Control, 15, 71-5.
  29. USDHHS (2004). The Health Consequences of Smoking: A Report of the Surgeon General.
  30. Verification (2002). Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res, 4, 149-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200210123581
  31. Zielinska-Danch W, Wardas W, Sobczak A, et al (2007). Estimation of urinary cotinine cut-off points distinguishing non-smokers, passive and active smokers. Biomarkers, 12, 484-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547500701421341

Cited by

  1. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Smoking Intentions among Non-smoking and Smoking Adolescents in Kota Tinggi, Johor, Malaysia vol.15, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.10.4359
  2. Effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on cigarette craving and oxidative stress index in heavy-smoker males: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial vol.32, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881118788806