DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Symbolic Meaning of Traditional Wedding Costume Inherent in the Afterlife Wedding Kut in the Honam Area - Focusing on the Process Performing A Traditional Wedding Ceremony-

호남지역 저승 혼사굿에 내재된 전통복식의 상징적 의미 - 혼례의식 연행과정을 중심으로-

  • Kim, Eun-Jung (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Chonnam National University/ Human Ecology Research Institute)
  • 김은정 (전남대학교 의류학과/생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2012.05.24
  • Accepted : 2012.09.02
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

The Kut is the core of the traditional folk religion. The afterlife wedding Kut actually performs a traditional wedding ceremony by personifying the deceased in the process of performing the composition of Kut geori that cannot be observed from other Kuts, which is an important means to convey the situation of Kut more clearly. A traditional wedding ceremony performed in the Kut enables the audience to understand the meaning behind the Kut. The costume worn in the traditional wedding ceremony of the afterlife wedding Kut makes the audience understand the existence of the deceased by the use of a scarecrow dialect and makes them feel a vivid sense of the scene emitting from the Kut, which performs a traditional wedding ceremony in the composition of Kut geori. The results of this study showed that a shaman who led the afterlife wedding Kut had a scarecrow that symbolized the bride and a bridegroom wear the traditional wedding costume in order to visualize the deceased and express the symbol of a wedding which could not be made in this world. It can be interpreted that the traditional costume derived from the afterlife wedding Kut plays a symbolic role, which converts the deceased into a living person through the formal aspect of ceremonial costume and the cultural aspect of wedding ceremony.

Keywords

References

  1. 김은정 (2008), 씻김굿 무속복식의 특징에 관한 연구, 남도민속연구, 17, p. 116.
  2. 안병국 (1998), 영혼 결혼고, 溫知論叢, 4(1), pp. 207-208.
  3. 최재석 (1980), 한국민속대관, 서울: 고려대 민족문화 연구소, pp. 370-371.
  4. 이경엽 (1998), 무가문학연구, 서울: 박이정, pp. 16-17.
  5. 강용권 (1980), 虛婚에 관한 고찰, 한국민속학, 13, pp. 117-119.
  6. 나수임 (1996), 한국의례복식의 기호학적 분석(1), 복식문화연구, 4(3), pp. 400-403.
  7. 유송옥 (1982), 사례복식, 한국의 복식, 서울: 한국문화재보호협회, p. 239.
  8. 안병국 (1998), 영혼 결혼고, 溫知論叢, 4(1), p. 215.
  9. 이경엽 (2004), 삶의 끝자락에서 펼치는 축제 씻김굿, 서울: 한얼미디어, p. 130.
  10. 안병국 (1998), 영혼 결혼고, 溫知論叢, 4(1), p. 224.
  11. 나수임 (2000), 한국의례복식의 기호학적 분석(II), 복식문화연구, 8(5), p. 22.
  12. 한명숙 (1987), 한국복식현상의 구조적 분석, 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  13. 차미경 (1995), 경극인물분장의 문화적 의미, 中語中文學, 35, p. 434.
  14. 장철수 (1995), 한국의 관혼상제, 서울: 집문당, p. 148.
  15. 이영배 (2011), 혼인습속의 고유성과 무의식의 사회문화적 의미, 國語文學, 50, p. 156.