References
- Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P. A., Eccles, M., Falck-Ytter, Y., Flottorp, S., et al. (2004). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 328, 1490-1494. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490
- Begg, C., Cho, M., Eastwood, S., Horton, R., Moher, D., Olkin, I., et al. (1996). Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 637-639. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030
- CONSORT: transparent reporting tirals [Internet]. [cited 2012 May 17]. Available from: http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/
- Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998). The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health,52, 377-384. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.6.377
- Gu, M. O., Cho, M. S., Cho, Y. A., Jeong, J. S., Eun, Y., Jeong, I. S., et al. (2012). A prioritizing for the evidence-based nursing practice guidelines development. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research,18(1), 39-51.
- Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, & Hallym University Industry Academic Cooperation Foundation. (2009, March). Development of an appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical research.
- Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
- Huh, D. S. (2011). NECA's guidance for undertaking systemic reviews and meta-analysis for intervention. Seoul: National Evidence-based healthcare Collaborating Agency.
- Jadad, A. R., Moore, R. A., Carroll, D., Jenkinson, C., Reynolds, D. J., Gavaghan, D. J., et al. (1996). Assessing the quality of reports of randomizedclinicaltrials: Is blindingnecessary? Controlled Clinical Trials, 17(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
- Kim, H. J., & Kim, S. Y. (2009). Quality Assessment of Non-Randomized Studies in the Korean Journal of Family Medicine. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 30, 129-137. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2009.30.2.129
- Kim, J. H., Choe, M. A., Kim, Y. K., Kim, J. H., Kim, H. S., Park, M. J., et al. (2006). An analysis on the researches using biological measurement in major Korean nursing journals. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 8(2), 61-72.
- Kim, S. Y., Ji, S. M., Lee, S. J., Lee, Y. J., Park, J. E., Nam, M. H., et al. (2011). Guidance for development of clinical practice guidelines Ver 1.0. National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating agency [NECA].
- Lee, J. U. (2009). Reporting guidelines of medical research. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 30, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2009.30.1.1
- Lee, K. E., Park, Y. R., Cho, K. J., & Park, M. J. (2011). Research trends in the Korean Biological Nursing Science-Based on analysis of the research papers published in the Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science from 1999 to 2010. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 13(2), 81-93.
- Lim, S. M., Shin, E. S., Lee, S. H., Seo, K. H., Jung, Y. M., Jang, J. E. (2011). Tools for assessing quality and risk of bias by levels of evidence. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 54, 419-429. http://dx.doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2011.54. 4.419
- Moher, D., Jones, A., & Lepage, L. (2001). Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials : a comparative before and afier evaluation. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 1992-1995. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.285.15.1992
- Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Annals of Internal Medicine, 134, 657-662. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00011
- Park, J., Lee, Y., Seo, H., Jang, B., Son, H., Kim, S.Y., et al. (2011). Risk of bias assessment tool for non-randomized studies (RoBANS): Development and validation of a new instrument. Paper presented at the meeting of the 19th Cochrane colloquium VI international conference on patient safety. Madrid.
- Park, M. H. (2006). Understanding and application of evidence based nursing. Seoul: Koonja.
- Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. (1th Ed.). London: Churchill Livingstone.
- Sackett, D. L., Straus, S. E., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. (2nd Ed.). London: Churchill Livingstone.
- Schulz, K. F., Altman, D.G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Annals of Internal Medicine,152, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-152-1-201001050-00179
- Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. (2011). SIGN 50: a guideline developers' handbook (Revised ed.) 2011 [Internet]. Edinburgh : Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2011[cited 2012 May 12]. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign50.pdf.
- Slim, K., Nini, E., Forestier, D., Kwiatkowski, F., Panis, Y., Chipponi, J. (2003). Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors-MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 73, 712-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
- STROBE statement [Internet]. [cited 2012 May 17]. Available from : http://www.strobe-statement.org/
- von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gotzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61, 344-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
- Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., et al. (2009). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses[Internet]. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; c1996-2010[cited 2012 May 12]. from: http://www.orhi.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
Cited by
- Analysis of Studies on High-Risk Infants and Quality Assessment of Intervention Studies vol.22, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2016.22.2.153
- A Systematic Review of Forest Therapy Programs for Elementary School Students vol.23, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2017.23.3.300
- The Trends in Research on the Health of North Korean Refugees vol.28, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2017.28.2.144
- The Quality of Reporting of Intervention Studies in the Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing (KJWHN): Based on the TREND Guidelines vol.19, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2013.19.4.306
- Quality Assessment of Non-Randomized Studies in the Journal of Korean Fundamentals of Nursing vol.21, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2014.21.3.311
- Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials: The Reporting Guideline for Randomized Controlled Trials vol.14, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2014.14.3.269
- Systematic Review of Meaning-centered Interventions for Adolescents vol.24, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2018.24.3.263
- 여성 난임 환자에게 적용되는 온라인 기반 중재의 특성 및 효과 분석: 체계적 문헌고찰 vol.25, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5953/jmjh.2018.25.3.205
- 회상요법이 치매노인의 우울증상에 미치는 효과: 체계적 문헌고찰 및 메타분석 vol.49, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2019.49.3.225
- 초등학생 대상의 국내 구강건강관리 프로그램에 대한 체계적 문헌고찰 vol.20, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20200024
- Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.57, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010026
- Research Trends on Mobile Mental Health Application for General Population: A Scoping Review vol.18, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052459