Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science

Korean society of Biological Nursing Science (한국기초간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Coorientation Analysis of Perception on Bionursing between Clinical Nurses and Nursing Professors

기초간호자연과학 교육과 연구에 대한 임상 간호사와 간호학 교수의 상호지향성 인식

  • 최명애 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 안경주 (청주대학교 간호학과) ;
  • 정재심 (울산대학교 임상전문간호학)
  • Received : 2012.10.30
  • Accepted : 2012.11.19
  • Published : 2012.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare perception on bionursing and satisfaction and importance about bionursing subjects of clinical nurses with that of professors using a coorientation model. Methods: Subjects for this study consisted of 135 clinical nurses at a tertiary hospital and 114 nursing professors. Questionnaire for perception on bionursing consisted of competency of professor, linkage with clinical practice and research of bionursing. Perceptions on bionursing education and research, satisfaction and importance about subjects of bionursing were measured. The data were analyzed by t-test. Results: Perception of clinical nurses on research of bionursing was more positive than professors. Perception of professors on research of bionursing was significantly less than that of professors estimated by clinical nurses. Perception of clinical nurses on linkage with clinical practice and research of bionursing estimated by nursing professor was significantly less than that of clinical nurses. Satisfaction of clinical nurses with the subjects of bionursing was significantly less than that of professors. Clinical nurses perceived anatomy the most important while professors perceived physiology the most important. Conclusion: Perceptions of clinical nurses on bionursing as well as satisfaction and importance about subjects of bionursing were identified to be different from those of professors.

Keywords

References

  1. Avery, E., Lariscy, R., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Social media and sharedor divergentuses? A coorientation analysis of public relations practitioners and journalists. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2010.489501
  2. Casey, G. (1996). Analysis of Akinsanya's model of bionursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 1065-1070. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.07311.x
  3. Choe, M. A., & Shin, G. S. (1997). A study on the current status of the curriculum operation of the basic medical sciences in nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 27, 975-987.
  4. Choe, M. A., & Shin, G. S. (1999). Objectives and contents of basic medical sciences in nursing education. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 29, 1455-1468. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.1999.29.6.1455
  5. Choe, M. A., Byeon, Y. S., Seo, Y. S., Hwang, A. R., Kim, H. S., Hong, H. S., et al. (1999). A study on the degree of need of human structure and function knowledge in clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 1, 1-24.
  6. Choe, M. A., Byun, Y. S., Seo, Y. S., Hwang, A. R., Kim, H. S., Hong, H. S., et al. (2000). A study on the degree of need of the knowledge of pathophysiology, clinical microbiology and mechanism and effects of drugs in clinical nurses. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing, 2(1), 1-19.
  7. Clancy, J., McVicar, A., & Bird, D. (2000). Getting it right? An exploration of issues relating to the biological sciences in nurse education and nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1522-1532. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01608.x
  8. Courtenay, M. (1991). A study of the teaching and learning of the biological sciences in nurse education. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16, 1110-1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb03372.x
  9. Danielson, E., & Berntsson, L. (2007). Registered nurses' perceptions of educational preparation for professional work and development in their profession. Nurse Education Today, 27, 900-908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.12.007
  10. Davies, S., Murphy, F., & Jordan, S. (2000). Bioscience in the preregistration curriculum: Finding the right teaching strategy. Nurse Education Today, 20, 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1054/nedt.1999.0375
  11. Davis, G. M. (2010). What is provided and what the registered nurse needs Bioscience learning through the preregistration curriculum. Nurse Education Today, 30, 707-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.01.008
  12. Friedel, J. M., & Treagust, D. F. (2005). Learning bioscience in nursing education: Perceptions of the intended and the prescribed curriculum. Learning in Health & Social Care, 4, 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2005.00104.x
  13. Hwang, A. R. (1998, December). Current status of the curriculum operation of biological nursing subjects-Yonsei University College of Nursing. Paper presented at the meeting of the Korean Biological Nursing Science, Seoul, Korea.
  14. Jervis, L. M. (1996). Nursing education in universitiesa perspective from biological sciences. Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356251960010105
  15. Kang, D. H. (2003). Psychoneuroimmunology in nursing research: A biobehavioral model. Research in Nursing & Health, 26, 421-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.10104
  16. Kyriacos, U., Jordan, S., & Heever, J. (2005). The biological sciences in nursing: A developing country perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03555.x
  17. Larcombe, J., & Dick, J. (2003). Who is best qualified to teach bioscience to nurses? Nursing Standard, 17(51), 38-44. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.17.32.38.s60
  18. Lee, K. E., Park, Y. R., Cho, K. J., & Park, M. J. (2011). Research trends in the Korean biological nursing scienceBased on analysis of the research papers published in the journal of Korean biological nursing science from 1999 to 2010. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 13(2), 81-93.
  19. McVicar, A., & Clancy, J. (2001). The biosciences and fitness for practice: A time for review? British Journal of Nursing, 10, 1415-1420. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2001.10.21.12369
  20. Meehan-Andrews, T. A. (2009). Teaching mode eficiency and learning preferences of first year nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 29, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.007
  21. Mooney, M. (2007). Facing registration: The expectation and the unexpectated. Nurse Education Today, 27, 840-847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2006.11.003
  22. Page, G, G. (2004). The importance of animal research to nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 52, 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2003.10.011
  23. Rudy, E., & Grady, P. (2005). Biological researchers: Building nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 53, 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2004.09.006
  24. Seo, W. S., & Lee, Y. W. (1999). A analysis of requisite knowledge body of physiology for clinical nursing practices. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 29, 711-720. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.1999.29.3.711
  25. Tkaes, N. C., & Thompson, H. J. (2006). From bedside to bench and back again: Research issues in animal models of human disease. Biological Research for Nursing, 8, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800406289717
  26. Tmobranski, P. H. (1993). Biological sciences and the nursing curriculum: A challenge for educationalists. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18, 493-499. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18030493.x
  27. WitekJanusek, L. (2004). Commentary on the importance of animal research to nursing science. Nursing Outlook, 52, 108-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2003.10.012
  28. Wong, J., & Wong, S. (1999). Contribution of basic sciences to academic success in nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 36, 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(99)00032-2
  29. Yoo, J. S., Ahn, J. A., Yeo, K. S., & Chu, S. H. (2008). The study to reorganize the course of basic nursing science in a college of nursing. Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science, 10(2), 162-169.

Cited by

  1. The Converging Effects of Complete Science Subjects in High School on the Grades of Basic Nursing Sciences and Major Nursing Subjects of Nursing Students of one University vol.7, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.5.097
  2. Effect of Nursing Students' Learning Motivation in Microbiology Lecture involved in Laboratory Based on the ARCS Model vol.26, pp.6, 2014, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2014.26.6.1425
  3. Analysis of Risk Factors to Predict Intensive Care Unit Transfer in Medical in-Patients vol.16, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2014.16.4.259
  4. The Relevance between Pathophysiological Subject and Examination Workbook Items for National Nurse Licensure Examination in South Korea and the United States vol.18, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2016.18.4.264