DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Iterative Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Dual Response Surface Optimization

쌍대반응표면최적화를 위한 반복적 선호도사후제시법

  • Jeong, In-Jun (Department of Business Administration, Daegu University)
  • Received : 2012.09.02
  • Accepted : 2012.11.12
  • Published : 2012.12.31

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims at improving inefficiency of an existing posterior preference articulation method proposed for dual response surface optimization. The method generates a set of non-dominated solutions and then allows a decision maker (DM) to select the best solution among them through an interval selection strategy. Methods: This paper proposes an iterative posterior preference articulation method, which repeatedly generates the predetermined number of non-dominated solutions in an interval which becomes gradually narrower over rounds. Results: The existing method generates a good number of non-dominated solutions not used in the DM's selection process, while the proposed method generates the minimal number of non-dominated solutions necessitated in the selection process. Conclusion: The proposed method enables a satisfactory compromise solution to be achieved with minimal cognitive burden of the DM as well as with light computation load in generating non-dominated solutions.

Keywords

References

  1. Box, George E. P., and Draper, Norman R. 1987. Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Carlyle, W. Matthew, Fowler, John W., Gel, Esma S., and Kim, Bosun. 2003. "Quantitative Comparison of Approximate Solution Sets for Bi-Criteria Optimization Problems." Decision Sciences 34:63-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5915.02254
  3. Copeland, Karen A. F., and Nelson, Peter R. 1996. "Dual Response Optimization via Direct Function Minimization." Journal of Quality Technology 28:331-336.
  4. Haimes, Yacov Y., Lasdon, Leon S., and Wismer, David A. 1971. "On a Bicriterion Formulation of the Problems of Integrated System Identification and System Optimization." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1:296-297. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1971.4308298
  5. Hwang, Ching-Lai, Masud, Abu Syed Md. Masud, Paidy, Sudhakar R., and Yoon, Kwangsun. 1979. Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  6. Jeong, In-Jun, Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Chang, Soo Y. 2005. "Optimal Weighting of Bias and Variance in Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 37:236-247.
  7. Khuri, Andre I., and Cornell, John A. 1996. Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses. New York: Dekker.
  8. Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Lin, Dennis K. J. 1998. "Dual Response Surface Optimization: a Fuzzy Modeling Approach." Journal of Quality Technology 30:1-10.
  9. Kim, Young-Jin. 2002. "Response Surface Approach to Integrated Optimization Modeling for Parameter and Tolerance Design." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 30:58-67.
  10. Koksalan, M. Murrat, and Sagala, Paul N. S. 1995. "Interactive Approaches for Discrete Alternative Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Monotone Utility Functions." Management Science 41:1158-1171. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.7.1158
  11. Koksoy, Onur and Doganaksoy, Necip. 2003. "Joint Optimization of Mean and Standard Deviation Using Response Surface Methods." Journal of Quality Technology 35:239-252.
  12. Lee, Dong-Hee, Jeong, In-Jun, and Kim, Kwang-Jae. 2010. "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Dual-Response-Surface Optimization." IIE Transactions 42:161-171.
  13. Lee, Dong-Hee, Kim, Kwang-Jae, and Kőksalan, Murrat. 2011. "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Multiresponse Surface Optimization." European Journal of Operational Research 210:301-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.09.032
  14. Lee, Woo-Sun and Rheem, Sung-Sue. 2001. "Some 3-Level Spherical Designs for Response Surface Experiments: Designs Constructed for the Radius of the Spherical Experimental Region to Vary with the Number of Factors." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 29:24-40.
  15. Lin, Dennis K. J. and Tu, Wanzhu. 1995. "Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 27:34-39.
  16. Miettinen, Kaisa. 2001. "Some Methods for Nonlinear Multi-Objective Optimization." Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1993:1-20.
  17. Myers, Raymond. H., and Montgomery, Douglas. C. 2002. Response Surface Methodology (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  18. Rheem, Sung-Sue, and Lee, Woo-Sun. 2005. "Multiresponse Optimization in Response Surface Analysis: A Method by Minimization of Weighted Sum of Estimates of Expected Squared Relative Errors." Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management 33:73-82.
  19. Shin, Sangmun and Cho, Byung Rae. 2006. "Robust Design Models for Customer-Specified Bounds on Process Parameters." Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 15:2-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0002-4
  20. Steuer, Ralph E. 1986. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Tang, L. C., and Xu, K. 2002. "A Unified Approach for Dual Response Surface Optimization." Journal of Quality Technology 34:437-447.
  22. Tind, Jorgen, and Wiecek, Margaret M. 1999. "Augmented Lagrangian and Tchebycheff Approaches in Multiple Objective Programming." Journal of Global Optimization 14:251-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008314306344
  23. Vining, G. Geoffrey, and Myers, Raymond H. 1990. "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies: A Dual Response Approach." Journal of Quality Technology 22:38-45.

Cited by

  1. A Posterior Preference Articulation Method to the Weighted Mean Squared Error Minimization Approach in Multi-Response Surface Optimization vol.16, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.10.7061