DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

깽깽이풀의 발생과 근연속간 비교

Embryology of Jeffersonia dubia Baker et S. Moore (Berberidaceae) and comparison with allied genera

  • ;
  • 허권 (강원대학교 식물자원응용공학과)
  • Ghimire, Balkrishna (Oriental Bio-herb Research Institute, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Heo, Kweon (Department of Applied Plant Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2012.11.17
  • 심사 : 2012.12.03
  • 발행 : 2012.12.30

초록

깽깽이풀의 발생학적 연구가 수행되었으며, 이를 매자나무과내의 근연속 들과 비교연구하였다. 깽깽이풀의 발생학적 특징은 4포약, basic type의 약벽형성, 2핵성의 glandular tapetum, 약벽 표피세포의 숙존, 내피층이 섬유상조직으로 발달, 판개형의 약 열개, 화분모세포의 연속형 세포질분열, 정사면체형 화분사분체, 약 열개시 화분은 2세포성, 양주피성, 도생배주, 후층성주심, 한개의 포원세포, 마디풀형 배낭형성, 성숙배낭은 타원형, 핵형 배유형성, 배 발생은 Onagrad 형태, 종자는 종의가 있고, 종피는 외종피외층형 등의 특징을 나타내었다. 매자나무과내의 다른 속들과 비교한 결과 깽깽이풀속은 융단세포의 핵수, 감수분열시 세포질의 분열패턴, 그리고 외종피외층의 두께 등에서 매자나무속이나 Mahonia속 보다는 삼지구엽초속과 Vancouveria 속에 좀 더 닮았다. 또한, 약벽형성 패턴, 융단세포의 핵수, 주심cap의 형성, 반족세포의 행동패턴등에서 한계령풀속과도 유사한 형질이 있었다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 한계령풀속은 다른 많은 발생형질과 분자 data에서 깽깽이풀속과는 다르다. 따라서 발생학적 증거들은 깽깽이풀속이 삼지구엽초속(Epimedium)과 Vancouveria 속에 가장 가까운 유연관계라는 것을 제시하고 있다.

Because the embryological features of Jeffersonia dubia are poorly understood, we conducted the first embryological study comparing it to other related genera of Berberidaceae. Important embryological features of J. dubia are as follows: the anther is tetrasporangiate, anther wall formation confirms basic type, glandular tapetum cells are two nucleate, the epidermis persistent, and the endothecium develops fibrous thickenings, anther dehiscence by two valves, meiosis in a microspore mother cell is accompanied by simultaneous cytokinesis, microspore tetrads are usually tetrahedral, pollen grains two cells at the time of anthesis. The ovule is bitegmic, anatropous and crassinucellate, archesporium single celled, development of the embryo sac Polygonum type, a mature embryo sac is ellipsoidal in shape. Endosperm formation is of Nuclear type and embryogeny Onagrad type. Seeds are arillate and seed coat exotestal type. Embryological comparisons showed that Jeffersonia resemble to Epimedium and Vancouveria rather than Berberis and Mahonia in some features, like as number of tapetal cells, cytokinesis in meiosis, and thickness of exotesta. It also resembles to Gymnospermium in mode of anther wall formation, number of tapetal cells, formation of nucellar cap, and nature of antipodal cells. Nevertheless, Jeffersonia and Gymnospermium differ from several other embryological features and molecular data too. Therefore, embryological evidences support that Jeffersonia is closely related with Epimedium and Vancouveria.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Andrews, F. M. 1895. Development of the embryo sac Jeffersonia diphylla. Botanical Gazatte 20: 423-424. https://doi.org/10.1086/327241
  2. Baskin, J. M. and C. C. Baskin. 1989. Seed germination ecophysiology of Jeffersonia diphylla, a perennial herb of mesic deciduous forests. American Journal of Botany 76(7): 1073-1080. https://doi.org/10.2307/2444529
  3. Berg, R. Y. 1972. Dispersal ecology of Vancouveria. American Journal of Botany 59: 109-122. https://doi.org/10.2307/2441389
  4. Chapman, M. 1936. Carpel anatomy of the Berberidaceae. American Journal of Botany 23: 340-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/2436095
  5. Ernst, W. R. 1964. The genera of Berberidaceae, Lardizabalaceae, and Menispermaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 45: 1-35.
  6. Furness, C. A. 2008. Successive microsporogenesis in eudicots with particular reference to Berberidaceae (Ranunculales). Plant Systematic and Evolution 273: 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-008-0001-7
  7. Graenicher, S. 1906. Some notes on the pollination of flowers. Bulletin Wisconsin Natural History Society 4(1-2): 12-21.
  8. Heithaus, E. R. 1981. Seed predation by rodents on three ant-dispersed plants. Ecology 62: 136-145. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936677
  9. Hutchinson, J. 1920. Jeffersonia and Plagiorhegma. Bulletin of Miscellaneous information Royal Gardens Kew 7: 242-245.
  10. Kim, Y. D. and R. K. Jansen. 1995. Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA variation in the Berberidaceae. Plant Systematic and Evolution [Suppl] 9: 341-349.
  11. Kim, Y. D. and R. K. Jansen. 1996. Phylogenetic implications of rbcL and ITS sequence variation in the Berberidaceae. Systematic Botany 21: 381-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419666
  12. Kim, Y. D. and R. K. Jansen. 1998. Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogeny of the Berberidaceae. American Journal of Botany 85: 1766-1778. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446511
  13. Kim, Y. D., S. H. Kim, C. H. Kim and R. K. Jansen. 2004. Phylogeny of Berberidaceae based on sequences of the chloroplast gene ndhF. Biochemical Systematic and Ecology 32: 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2003.08.002
  14. Kumazawa, M. 1936. Pollen grain morphology in Ranunculaceae, Lardizabalaceaae and Berberidaceae. Japanese Journal of Botany 8: 19-46.
  15. Lee, T. B. 1982. Classification on endemic taxa in Korea. Seoul Nat'l Univ. Agri. Research 8: 71-113. (in Korean)
  16. Lewis, C. E. 1904. Studies on some anomalous dicotyledonous plants. Botanical Gazette 37: 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1086/328453
  17. Loconte, H. and J. R. Estes. 1989. Phylogenetic systematics of Berberidaceae and Ranunculales (Magnolliidae). Systematic Botany 14: 565-579. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419001
  18. Loconte, H. 1993. Berberidaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Kubitzki, K. et al. (eds.), Berlin 2: 147-152.
  19. Lovell, H. B. 1941. Ecology of Kentucky flowers; Claytonia, Mertenzia and Jeffersonia. Trans Kentucky Academy Science 9: 43-47.
  20. Meacham, C. A. 1980. Phylogeny of the Berberidaceae with an evaluation of classifications. Systematic Botany 5: 149-172. https://doi.org/10.2307/2418623
  21. Miyaji, Y. 1930. Beitrage zur chromosomenphylogenie der Berberidaceen. Planta 11: 650-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912565
  22. Nowicke, J. W. and J. J. Skvarla. 1981. Pollen morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the Berberidaceae. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 50: 1-30.
  23. Sastri, R. L. 1969. Floral morphology, embryology, and relationships of the Berberidaceae. Australian Journal of Botany 17: 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9690069
  24. Smith, B. H., M. L. Ronsheim and K. R. Swartz. 1986. Reproductive ecology of Jeffersonia diphylla (Berberidaceae). American Journal of Botany 73: 1416-1426. https://doi.org/10.2307/2443846
  25. Terabayashi, S. 1979. Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae. III. Floral anatomy of Epimedium grandiflorum Morren subsp. sempervirens (Nakai) Kitamura and Vancouveria hexandra (Hooker) Morren et Decaisne. Acta. Phytotax. Geobotanica 30: 153-168.
  26. Terabayashi, S. 1981. Studies in the morphology and systematics of Berberidaceae. IV. Floral anatomy of Plagiorhegma dubia, Jeffersonia diphylla and Achlys triphylla ssp. japonica. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) 94: 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488272
  27. Terabayashi, S. 1985a. The comparative floral anatomy and systematics of the Berberidaceae I. Morphology. Memories of the Faculty of Science, Kyoto University, Series Biology 5: 73-90.
  28. Terabayashi, S. 1985b. The comparative floral anatomy and systematics of the Berberidaceae II. Systematic considerations. Acta Phytotax Geobot 36: 1-13.
  29. Tobe, H. and P. H. Raven. 1984. The number of cells in the pollen of Melastomataceae. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) 97: 131-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02488152

피인용 문헌

  1. (Berberidaceae): Historical genetic bottlenecks and strong spatial structures among populations vol.8, pp.17, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4362
  2. Development and characterization of 30 microsatellite loci for Plagiorhegma dubium (Berberidaceae) vol.6, pp.12, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/aps3.1200