DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Affinity analysis for Rural Amenity Resources according to the Life-Styles of Urbanites

도시민의 라이프스타일에 따른 농촌어메니티자원 선호도 분석

  • Seo, Ju-Hwan (College of Art and Design, KyungHee University) ;
  • Jun, Min-Jung (Dept. of Environmental Landscape Architecture, KyungHee University)
  • 서주환 (경희대학교 예술디자인대학) ;
  • 전민정 (경희대학교 환경조경학과)
  • Received : 2012.11.05
  • Accepted : 2012.12.18
  • Published : 2012.12.30

Abstract

The demand of rural tourism industry has increased among the urbanites in South Korea, in due to the increase of leisure activity and the emergence of ageing society. Rural amenity resources are gaining various interests, in the value creation and promotion of tourism. In this study, the propensities of city dwellers were separated by life-style classification, and each affinity to the rural amenity resources was examined in accordance with the separation. A questionnaire survey of urbanites in the southern area of Gyeonggi-do, the most populous province in South Korea, was conducted to analyze the preference of city dwellers about rural amenity resource and life-style of themselves. For statistical verification, $IBM^{(R)}$ $SPSS^{(R)}$ Statistics 20 software was used for frequency, reliability, factor and multiple regression analysis of this research. The results of the statistical analyses found a noticeable characteristic in life-style classification. The affinities of urbanites can be classified into four congregations of life-style factors in this statistical model. Each congregation of the factors was named as 'Self-development-oriented', 'Leisure-oriented', 'Achievement-oriented', and 'Culture-oriented' life-style, to represent the characteristics for convenience' sake. Among these styles, only 'Self-development-oriented' and 'Achievement-oriented' showed the positive correlation with rural amenity resources in the multiple regression analysis. In addition, the rural amenity resources were also analyzed in accordance with the life-styles classification of urbanites. City dwellers showed the highest interest to the 'natural resource management facility resource' in natural resources, the 'traditional heritage resource' in cultural resources, and the 'community resource' in social resources. Meanwhile, they showed less interest to 'agricultural and scenery resources' in natural resources, 'specialty production resource' in cultural resources, and 'cooperative farming' in social resources. These characteristics can be constructed as meaning that the urbanites who concern self-development and achievement of their lives have high interest in rural amenity resources, and the main interest of them is not 'return-to-the-farm'(歸農) but 'return-to-the-home'(歸村).

Keywords

References

  1. 김동준, 황대욱, 2012, 여가활동의 라이프스타일 유형에 따른 여가만족과 자아실현 관계연구.
  2. 김성혁, 이정규, 1999, 관광객의 라이프스타일에 따른 문화관광 구매의사 결정의 차이.
  3. 농촌어메니티정보시스템 http://rural.rda.go.kr.
  4. 농촌자원개발연구소, 2005, 농촌어메니티 자원 조사 사업 보고서, 농촌진흥청.
  5. 박광석, 2005, 대학생들의 라이프스타일에 따른 여가행태에 관한 연구.
  6. 박석희, 송화성, 윤준근, 2006, 도시민의 라이프스타일에 따른 농촌어메니티 자원 요구도 분석.
  7. 박재철, 2009, 농촌어메니티 자원분포와 유형별 자원의 특성분석.
  8. 송광인, 김정준, 2009, 관광객 라이프스타일에 따른 농촌체험관광 영향관계 연구.
  9. 송화성, 박석희, 2006, 라이프스타일이 농촌어메니 티자원 선호 및 농촌관광활동 참여에 미치는 영향.
  10. 오윤경, 조순재, 최진용, 임승빈, 안동만, 이정재, 이동근, 2007, 농촌어메니티 자원조사 연구.
  11. 윤유식, 2010, 농촌어메니티 관광자원 매력성에 따른 관광체험만족도 및 관광개발지지도에 대한 구조관계분석.
  12. 윤희정, 2008, 도시민의 농촌어메니티자원 체험욕구 분석.
  13. 이정원, 정윤희, 임승빈, 2006, 농촌어메니티자원의 농촌다움 특성 평가에 관한 연구.
  14. 정수희, 김현정, 2002, 라이프스타일 연구에 관한 이론적 고찰.
  15. 조명환, 2005, 현대인의 라이프스타일과 여가활동에 관한 연구.
  16. 조수현, 2012, 국내외 대학생의 라이프스타일 집단 여가만족에 차이에 관한 연구.
  17. 최영완, 김영주, 2012, 농촌공간의 구조적 특성에 바탕으로 한 어메니티자원 분류체계 재정립.
  18. 허지현, 최현식, 최영민, 2008, 관광자의 라이프스타 일에 따른 농촌체험관광형태별 선호도에 관한 연구.
  19. Belike. P, 1987, Dialoge 2. Typologien und Fallbeispiele, Hamburg, Germany:Gruner+Jahr.
  20. Hawes, D.W. 1988, Travel-related lifestyle profiles of older women. Journal of Travel Research, 27(2), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728758802700204
  21. Roberts, L. & Hall, D, 2001, Rural Tourism and Recreation: Principles to Pratice. New York, NY: CABI Publishing.
  22. William, L, 1975, Life style Concepts and Marketing in Stephen A. Greyser(ed.) Toward Scientific Marketing. Chicago American Marketing Association, 130-131.
  23. Zins, A H, 1998, Leisure Traveler Choice Models of Theme Hotels Using Psychographics, Journal of Travel Research. 36(Spring).

Cited by

  1. The Spatial Location Analysis of Rural Village and Amenity Resources vol.19, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2013.19.1.081